Legs missing in picture

Hey, who honeslty cares? =p

Originally posted by Mynaeris
I think the evidence is quite clear that since he is the only person who never appears on any of the pictures that he is the one who took them?

Sip some tea. I thought this guy simply loaded the pictures for his friend. The author of this thread wasn't actually at the beach. What's the problem?

The problem is that some people will go out of their way to debunk something, based on assumptions...

P.S: And then other people accept that debunking as valid.

[edit on 6-7-2004 by TheBandit795]

Its firstly not a suspicion I am positive its a hoax, a lucky shot but hoaxing people on ATS, now wanting to discuss the paranormal aspects of it, if you read his postings. And YES I will sip some tea but the pics are his , they are in his yahoo files. Geez you may pass Gullible and collect $200.

If they are his pictures (and he took them) then he is violating the terms & conditions of ATS, and is risking being banned. That's why I doubt he's lying.

Just goes to show you, If your a big fat ugly slob that parties all the time you to can have a hot chic

Can we logic this?

Please note that the person called superhurtin - had these pics on his yahoo photofile.

This person also fits the description given by d1k? and finally has the same homepage ad d1k? home.cogeco.ca...

Ergo d1k and superhurtin are the same person. Secondly it may interest you to know that d1k recently had a problem with his avatar being considered offensive.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

This really has nothing to do with the current posting, but I must say that d1k has milked one of his photos from LAST (august 2003) summer to the extreme. KNOWING that the pic was a lucky and funny shot he tried to hoax us into believing it was of paranormal value. The fact that he denied he took the pics yet its on his profile makes me positive that he is not bona fide about anything.


Project Pisces that was funny - "Just goes to show you, If your a big fat ugly slob that parties all the time you to can have a hot chic "
However a guy who can get a chick hot or otherwise doesn't need to take pics like these.
ca.f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com.../d415&.dnm=3121.jpg
ca.f2.pg.photos.yahoo.com.../d415&.dnm=a76e.jpg
hmmmm wonder why he took those?




[edit on 6-7-2004 by Mynaeris]

Myaenaris wrote:

Just goes to show you, If your a big fat ugly slob that parties all the time you to can have a hot chic

Maybe they're working ladies

[edit on 6-7-2004 by sugeshotcha]

I'm with Bandit here...why oh why would someone just waist away their time showing everyone a photo he faked! If it was faked then he's no doubt got the biggest grin on his face for spurring this arguement, but I think by judging his comments recently, that it is not a fake and that he would like some form of discussion beyond photoshop...I think we've tried to get this thread going in the right direction multiple times, but either no one is looking over the past few pages or some people are just too stubborn for their own good.

As I asked a few posts back - maybe you can tell us a location of where these photos were taken...or explain a little more about why you edited your original post to tell us that the man in the picture is not that great of a person...any other details you can lend will lead way to a more fruitful conversation...I think muppet did an excellent job of analyzing the pictures for editing, and came up with minimal proof...Let's get beyond this

Originally posted by Mynaeris
Can we logic this?

Please note that the person called superhurtin - had these pics on his yahoo photofile.

This person also fits the description given by d1k? and finally has the same homepage ad d1k? home.cogeco.ca...

Ergo d1k and superhurtin are the same person.

Well done on the investigative front Mynaeris. D1k *in my best Cuban accent* you have some splaining to do.

Originally posted by d1k
Since the camera owner does not have a computer he brought it to me to save his pictures..................................................... I assure you this is no hoax, the pictures came straight from the camera onto my computer where they have been sitting for a year.

What's the problem? Of course dk1 and superhurtin are the same person. He clearly states that the camera owner didn't have a computer, so the pics have been on dk1's computer for a year. This isn't a case of gullibility, but a case of deductive reasoning.

I don't know why the man's legs aren't visible, but I have no reason to scream PHOTOSHOP/FAKE/LIAR.

[edit on 7/6/2004 by Bangin]

Originally posted by d1k
Don't assume things, the person who owns/took the photos was here when I posted and when I made the yahoo photo album.

Like Bangin said. They are the same person, but that doesn't mean d1k is lying. maybe the other guy doesn't know how to make a yahoo photo album, and d1k is using his own album account to post the photo's.

Furthermore, because I don't have my own website, sometimes I use my best friends' website in my signature or in my profile. So in the same breath I can deduct that this webpage: home.cogeco.ca... is not d1k's webpage. I might be right or wrong, but you can't easily tie his earlier mishap with this thread as you just did.

[edit on 6-7-2004 by TheBandit795]

Hrm...
just wonderin..
What sort of person buys a digital camera and doesnt have a computer?
dont get me wrong, I believe what d1k is saying! =p

All I can say is "SURE". Who wouldn't want to save his friends pervy pics. Check out the ones in my previous posting.

Or check out superhurtin's other link.
home.cogeco.ca...

Either way, the pic shows clearly the guys body is leaning way backwards if you know anything about perspective - its not about legs disappearing at all. As I said its all nice of him to share the pics of two girls but to try and convince us of missing legs and the paranormal??? COME ON, kids.

My gf has a digital camera and no computer. What's so hard to believe about that? There are digital photo stores you know.

hehe ok fair enough
that cyber.txt was on a website i was lookin at last night.. it was quite funny, you can find it on BTS

OK. I'm not accusing anyone of anything here, but I did a quick pic to illustrate how such an images *could* have been achieved, *if* digital means were used.

It actually wouldn't be as tricky as I first thought, if we assume the guy was basically standing behind the girl on the right. Just reasonable photoshop skills required.

take a look, and remember this is purely a hypothetical reconstruction.



[edit on 6-7-2004 by muppet]

Personally, after following this post for awhile I came up with a simple solution. He has only has one leg. He is missing his right leg in real life. Therefor,he can look legless in the shot with his left leg behind the female and putting pressure on it and also on the fine ladies (Because it does look like he is sort of using them for support) without choking them with weight and also give the shirt the drapery effect.

I think regardless of wether it is real/hoax/whatever (although I personally think its a lucky shot, and he is just trying to milk it for all its worth by going "OMG WHAT DOES IT MEAN, HES A TERRIBLE GUY WTG") IT DOESNT MATTER.

This isnt some sort of GRAVE IMPORTANCE!

This is a picture, on a website, of some guy who posed weird.

Why the HELL does this thread have 5 pages?!?! lol

This is crazy that yall are reading so far into something so unimportant!

Not a hoax but a government cover up of the Soviet Union (and you htought they fell, HA!) super top secret star gate project. You see they traveled to another planet with John Titor grabbed a grey, came back used John's Time machine, and tested the invisibility pants on this guy. His legs are there, just invisible because of the pants supplied to him by the evil communists, the mysterious greys, and the infamous John Titor, and the US government who knew all this would happen, introduced Photoshop so it would be passed off as Photoshopped.

I solved it, Thread Closed. Hopefully.