It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
8 And the four beasts had each of them six wings about him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, LORD God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.
11 Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.
Could it mean that the carbon atom is god
Don't you feel that you are anthropomorphising
a particle and in some instances, nothing at all?
Originally posted by LordBucket
These "particles" you suspect me of anthropomorphizing could have been you. All that you are is merely one possibility amongst infinity. They can be do and be anything, of which humans are merely one possibility. And yet you ask me if I may be giving them too much credit by attributing human characteristics to them?
In philosophical alchemy the four elements become abstractions of their type. The name "elemental" means or implies irreducibility, and this set of Elements are therefore a kind of building block out of which more complex components are formed.
The first clue as to their Philosophical Alchemical use comes from their inclusion in astrological symbology, where there are three of each element in the twelve basic astrological sign. For example, Fire Cardinal, Fire Fixed, and Fire Mutable form the signs Aries, Leo, and Sagittarius, with the attributes of a combination of the pair. The second term, called astrological qualities, are likewise repeated across the matrix of four elements. Thus there is a primitive (though not in the derogatory sense) kind of psychology made out of irreducible variables.
The fundamental understanding of philosophical alchemy is that everything must be composed of higher and different kinds of abstractions from building blocks like these. In fact these building blocks in part. This is similar to the general law of discovery called Occham's Razor. The specifics center the Elements as they appear here not with physical material, but with principles that might be centered about Newtonian Physics, with the establishment of "fundaments of nature" that are constants at this level, but variables elsewhere in a very simple "Mathematics of the Creation." Those constants are well known and established: Force and Counter-force, Inertia and Potential. Those are the abstractions of (in order) fire, water, earth, and air. Thus there are logical dynamics of pairs already in these four basic elements.
This logic was established primarily by Pietre Ouspensky, a mathematician and investigator in early part of the 20th century, whose second treatice, A New Model of the Universe, established a logical and mathematical commonality, matrix, or link between similarly esoteric and occultic or supernatural or philosophical | early psychological systems, from the symbology of astrology, that of the Tarot, and the practice of Kabbalah (or Gematria), not to mention magic.
"The teachings of Gurdjieff are good; but one must always refer to Samael for authority. There are numerous differences, the most obvious being the sexual teachings. Also, Gurdjieff inverted other things, so one must be careful.
"Also, his students made a lot of mistakes. While there is some benefit from reading Ouspensky, I strongly suggest you avoid Bennett, Nicoll, and all the others, because each introduces so many problems and confusions that you will end corrupting your understanding."
"From my memory—at this very moment—I recall the unusual case of Piotr Demianovich Ouspensky, who when walking on the streets of Saint Petersburg, had the resolve to remember his self, and to not forget about himself, not even for an instant. Thus, he said that as he remembered himself from moment to moment, he even perceived a spiritual aspect within all things, and while this type of spiritual lucidity was increasing he felt his psyche gradually transformed, etc. Nevertheless, something very discouraging happened to him: all of a sudden he felt the necessity to enter a smoke shop in order to select an order of some tobacco. Certainly, after being attended and provided with his order of cigars, he left the smoke shop very quietly while smoking along an avenue. Thereafter, remembering different things and occupied in diverse intellectual matters, etc., he walked through different places of Saint Petersburg; in other words, he became absorbed within his own thoughts.
"An hour and a half later—already at his home—he observed very well his room, his bedroom, his living room, his desk, etc., and suddenly, he remembered that he had first wandered through many places with his consciousness awake, but after having entered into the cigarette shop his psyche had fallen asleep again, and thus, his good intentions of remaining awake from moment to moment were reduced to cosmic dust; thus, he regretted the incident. He took an hour and a half to reach his home, and during that entire time, he regrettably treaded the streets of the city with his consciousness completely asleep.
"Behold how difficult it is to remain with the consciousness awake from instant to instant, from moment to moment, from second after second. However, if one has true longings for becoming fully awakened—this is the beginning—one must not forget oneself, not even for a moment." - סםאל און ואור
The Fourth Way (or Fourth Path) "There are four basic divisions amongst spiritual schools:
"The path of the Fakir: those who seek union with God through willpower; this includes those who practice Hatha Yoga, physical austerities (tapas), etc.
"The path of the Monk: those who seek union with God through emotion; this includes those who practice Bhakti Yoga, whose religion is prayer, or music or devotional practices.
"The path of the Yogi: those who seek union with God through the intellect; this includes those who practice Jnana Yoga, who study and memorize theories and doctrines, or through various forms of meditation.
"The path of the well-balanced human being: includes those schools and religions which unify all three paths in one, under the equilibrating influence of chastity, and guided by the Three Factors: birth, death and sacrifice.
"When referring to the schools of the Fourth Way, we find that Gurdjieff, Ouspensky, and Nicoll had written what they knew, but their expositions suffer from many mistakes. For example, Gurdjieff committed the error of mistaking the Kundalini with the abominable Kundabuffer organ, and Ouspensky committed the same error. We cannot desist recognizing the existence of that blind fohatic force that has people hypnotized; yet this one has nothing to do with the Kundalini, but with the Kundabuffer that is the lunar fire...." Samael Aun Weor, Tarot and Kabbalah
originally posted by NewAgeMan
I am curious about what your thoughts are regarding the atheist's ability to achieve, in life, unity with God, or do they self-prohibit any such approach in accordance with a variety of intellectual assumptions they make about what cannot be true, or possible?
Just curious about that. Thanks.
Eikasia, Pistis, Dianoia, and Nous (see also: Turiya and Sophia
Plato: The Allegory of the Cave
Originally posted by LordBucket
reply to post by InfaRedMan
Don't you feel that you are anthropomorphising
a particle and in some instances, nothing at all?
But that is the point: whether you anthropomorphize these things or not is merely aesthetics. Look at your desk if you wish and think of it as a piece of wood of you wish. That wood could have been a bed. It could have been a pretty statue. The atoms in that wood could have been anything: the air you breath, or a star...anything.
These "particles" you suspect me of anthropomorphizing could have been you. All that you are is merely one possibility amongst infinity. They can be do and be anything, of which humans are merely one possibility. And yet you ask me if I may be giving them too much credit by attributing human characteristics to them?
Originally posted by LordBucket
reply to post by InfaRedMan
Could it mean that the carbon atom is god
Whatever is the "stuff" of the universe, whatever it is that carbon atoms and not-carbon atoms and empty space and everything else is all composed of, it is everywhere and it can become anything. Omnipresence, and omnipotence.
How is that not Divine?