UFO - Victorville, CA - November 14, 2010 - CLEAR VIDEO

One of my subscribed friends on YouTube uploaded this video two hours ago. I'm actually quite baffled by what the unidentified craft is, but nevertheless, I'm open to any suggestions.

It seems to me a classic video of a black triangle UFO:


God, I love a good UFO video.

First impression... Christmas lights.
There is absolutely nothing to gauge size or distance by and what...5 seconds of film?

ETA: 7 seconds of video...can your friend provide a longer clip with some sort of context? This really could be anything at all...

Not SO interesting...

I mean...this is spectacular, but too short. I can't give my input on this one...Maybe try to contact that friend and ask him if he has a longer footage?

Also, as spectacular as it seems...why is it the only footage of it? I mean...it seemed QUITE noticeable. Why wouldn't anyone report it?

My initial verdict: Hoax/BS/misidentification

Yeah, hoax, BS, christmas lights etc...

Nothing to see here

Clips with no start and no end and a mere 5 seconds in between really aren't worth posting up here. Especially not when they're clearly Christmas decorations

Your "friend" is taking you for a ride. Punch him.

It's whole 6 seconds long... What does anyone get out of that?


...let me guess, the object mysteriously disappeared at the 0:07 second mark so the person who posted the video decided to cut it at 0:06 seconds because that's all that's important.

Originally posted by Portugoal
It's whole 6 seconds long...

What does anyone get out of that?


...let me guess, the object mysteriously disappeared at the 0:07 second mark so the person who posted the video decided to cut it at 0:06 seconds because that's all that's important.

Perhaps...

He could've grabbed the video long enough to film it before it went away.

Originally posted by Gab1159
Not SO interesting...

I mean...this is spectacular, but too short. I can't give my input on this one...Maybe try to contact that friend and ask him if he has a longer footage?

Also, as spectacular as it seems...why is it the only footage of it? I mean...it seemed QUITE noticeable. Why wouldn't anyone report it?

My initial verdict: Hoax/BS/misidentification

Well, for this incident, so far, this is the only footage, but this isn't the first time black triangle UFO's have been reported in Victorville, CA.

There even has been reporting done of a couple seeing a black triangle UFO in Victorville back in October of 2010.

reply to post by Mak Manto


yeah but why not film it till it disappears over the horizon? We have a grand total of three (3) flash series and then POOF!

ATS needs to hold a seminar: UFO filming 1001: How to NOT be Called a Hoaxer...

reply to post by Mak Manto


Looks like a Star Destroyer from Star Wars with some Christmas lights on it.

Originally posted by Cole DeSteele
reply to post by Mak Manto

 

yeah but why not film it till it disappears over the horizon? We have a grand total of three (3) flash series and then POOF!

ATS needs to hold a seminar: UFO filming 1001: How to NOT be Called a Hoaxer...

Not true, really...

I've seen dozens of videos on this site that have been long and showing clear footage of UFOs to only be called as fake or as CGI hoaxes.

Even the good videos are considered faked...

So, what is it, really? Can it only ever be a true UFO if the video is a couple of minutes long and the footage is kind of grainy?

UFO - Victorville, CA - November 14, 2010 - CLEAR VIDEO

Yes, CLEAR VIDEO OF LED LIGHTS.

You can't even be sure the thing actually is flying or not.

Hoax...

See?

LED lights... What video is open on here to be taken as seriously...

Yeah, looks like christmas lights seen through tree branches

reply to post by Mak Manto


Why are UFOs ALWAYS grainy?!?!!? That really ticks me off... Besides the huge UFO sighting that thousands of people witnessed (Denver?), is there any other video that ISN'T grainy and ISN'T 6 seconds long.

Mak, usually a genuine sighting consists of these elements:

1. Camera person narrates, is shocked, or shouts for someone else to "come see this"
2. Camera person attempts to take as much footage as possible, they zoom in and out, show other lights/hills in the area
3. Actual shapes, like a triangle, a sphere...not just a random mish mash of Xmas tree lights sprawled over a tree set to mode 4 (Sparkle wildly)
4. A witness description of the event in the video info

Hoaxes or mis-identification vids usually include the following:
1. Crap background music, most often, the X Files theme
2. A run time of under 10 seconds
3. No audio or a completely silent camera person (usually because they know exactly what they're filming)
4. Little investigative camera work, fake software rendered zooming

Which of those fit the video you've presented? Their sighting description "Me and my buddy saw this above. The end"...is a big tell tale sign of attention seekers.

reply to post by Mak Manto


I took the video very seriously when I first watched it.

Now that I can clearly see they are LED lights being run by a micro-controller, I can stop taking this video seriously because it is seriously a hoax.

Originally posted by Portugoal
reply to post by Mak Manto

 

Why are UFOs ALWAYS grainy?!?!!? That really ticks me off... Besides the huge UFO sighting that thousands of people witnessed (Denver?), is there any other video that ISN'T grainy and ISN'T 6 seconds long.

Except those are few and limited.

The Phoenix Lights, the Stephenville Sighting, etc...

They're few and far. There are hundreds of amateur UFO videos that come out, especially on YouTube, that are short and or grainy. We can't just say they're fake or hoaxes.

reply to post by Cole DeSteele


I second the Christmas lights!
That's my first impression.

reply to post by Mak Manto


It was Pheonix I was talking about. These videos are few and far between because, unfortunately, garbage floods youtube.

It is this kind of stuff that is creating the CRY WOLF
of UFO sitings.
somebody is either just plain uneducated,.
or intentional on posting this kind of baloney.
such a shame
Mr skeptic expects us to be nice about this,
Well how about using at least a little common sense..