Gaia - The future of politics.

Gaia (the trancript)

Gaia, the future of politics.

Gaia, a New World Order, is born today, the 14 August 2054.
Racial conflicts, ideological conflicts, religious conflicts, territorial conflicts belong to the past.
Every man is a world citizen, subject to the same law.
The Internet has driven the change, spreading communication, knowledge and organization at a planetary level.

The Pyramids of Egypt, the Colosseum of Rome, the Church of the Holy Wisdom are demonstrations of power.
The Roman Empire lasts for centuries because of its road network: the “cursus publicus”.
Genghis Khan creates a network of horsemen to have real time information from everywhere in his empire, the greatest of all times, and to be able to concentrate in a few days all its military force on a single point.
Savonarola, a monk from Ferrara that anticipated Martin Luther and John Calvin, invents the “open letters”, printed in thousand of copies and distributed to the citizens of Florence.
The French Revolution walks on the legs of the ideas of the Diderot and D’Alembert’s Enciclopèdie and of the Voltaire’s Dictionnarie Philosophique.
Benito Mussolini uses the radio to communicate with the people who gather together in all the squares of Italy.
The movies of Leni Riefensthal give a great popularity to Adolf Hitler.
The first live transmission of the sessions of the House of Commons in the United Kingdom is broadcast by BBC radio in 1975.

At the beginning of the 21st century the fate of the world is still determined by masonic, religious and financial groups.
130 of the most influential personalities of the world, the Bildeberg group, have a private meeeting every year to discuss the future of the world economy.

Before the Net, communication, knowledge and organization belonged to the power. With the Net they belong to all the people.

1998 MoveOn, a political site, launches a campaign in favour of Bill Clinton with a million emails sent to the Congress of the US

1999 In Seattle thousands of activists protest against WTO thanks to the Internet.

2002 A “coup d’état” in Venezuela fails. Chavez is back as president because of the information diffused on the Internet and via SMS.

2004 Howard Dean, an unknown governor of Vermont, becomes a pretender to the White House. He creates a worldwide network of supporters with the Internet platform MeetUp and communicates with millions of persons through his blog blogforamerica.com

In many States like China, Iran, Malaysia and Singapore the Net is under control.

2007: In Italy, V Day is the biggest political event that has ever been brought together by using the Internet. It’s coordinated through the blog of the famous Italian comedian, Beppe Grillo. Two million people pour out onto the streets to demonstrate in favour of a “clean up” in Parliament.
2008 Obama wins the primary elections against Hilary Clinton. He collects more funds than any other candidate directly from the citizens using the Net

2008 Obama wins the US presidential elections

2008 At the Web 2.0 Summit in San Francisco, Al Gore declares that the problems of the world, like the global warming, can be solved only by the cooperative intelligence of the people on the Internet

2018 The World is divided into two main areas. The West with direct democracy and free access to Internet. China, Russia and the Middle East with orwellian dictatorship and controlled access to the Internet

2020. Beginning of the Third world War that lasts 20 years. Destruction of the symbols of the West, Saint Peter’s Square, Notre-Dame de Reims, Sagrada Família.
Use of bacteriological weapons.
Acceleration of climate change and rising of the seas of 12 metres. Starvation.
End of the fossil fuel era.
Reduction of the world population to one billion people.

2040. The West wins. Net democracies triumph

2043. Grassroots movements emerge all over the world to manage local problems related to energy, food, environment, health. The planet is split into thousands of communities linked by the Net

2047. Everyone has his identity in a world social network, created by Google, called Earthlink. To be you must be in Earthlink, or be not. No passport is required anymore.

2050. BrainTrust, a collective social intelligence, allows people to solve complex problems in a matter of days sharing any kind of information and data on line.

2051. A world referendum is held on the Net to abolish the death penalty.

2054. First world elections on the Net. A World Government, called Gaia, is elected. Secret organizations are banned. Every human can become president and control the actions of the government through the Net.

In Gaia, parties, politics, ideologies, religions disappear.
Man is the only owner of his destiny.
Collective knowledge is the new politics.

I was amazed to see a video that openly they make a projection of the future, involving everything, more or less, are in the predictions of the elite and bringing even the veneer of a Virtual Era nd a NWO. Almost what , and some movies Hollywood deal with - a future dominated by the machine.

What might happen in the coming years if a destiny was planned to lead humanity to a new world order?

Would it be possible to impose to citizens without consulting them a new world order that they did not expect and did not ask for?

It would be possible to renew humanity in an artificial way?

It would be physically possible to build a better(or Orwelling/distopian) world?

War, genocide and reduction of the world population to an amount of people which makes it even easier to control?

Intriguing video.

Propaganda? Prediction? Just BS?

What do you think about this?

I unfortunately don't have sound at work.. so will catch the video later. However from your post it looks like the video paints a one world government in a positive light. I have to say that at least in theory I agree. A one world government is really the only future that makes sense. We are all human and living on this planet together. While I think cultural differences are essential I think most artificial divisions that we allow to cause conflict like nationality and religious preferences need to be overcome. I think only a one world government has any real chance of ending war.

reply to post by wisintel

I unfortunately don't have sound at work.. so will catch the video later. However from your post it looks like the video paints a one world government in a positive light. I have to say that at least in theory I agree. A one world government is really the only future that makes sense. We are all human and living on this planet together. While I think cultural differences are essential I think most artificial divisions that we allow to cause conflict like nationality and religious preferences need to be overcome. I think only a one world government has any real chance of ending war.

The video REALLY paints a one world government in a positive light, BUT, is it possible? A decentralized government and with the premise that anyone connected to the network (if not, you dont exist, terrible thing) can have a voice. But this voice would be a valid voice? A manipulated voice? Or "the voice" do not exist at all and we all think that we are free because we believe that we have one(just as today)?

reply to post by wisintel


A new type(more effective) of anarchy?

2

I think the concept of a single world government gets a bad rap, mostly from those who consider bigger government to be bad and those who think it's the infamous NWO behind it.

It really matters WHO is running things and for what purpose.

The human is tribal by nature and succeeds most when cooperating not competing. In reality, the Earth and all it's lands belong to all sentient beings.

Drawing lines on a map that change every century is a phase which we will inevitably grow out of.


As Brzezinski said recently, for the first time in human history the world is aware. Mankind is awake and staring.

This has no doubt to do with the internet and IT.

Think of all the things we could accomplish together with human prosperity as our ultimate goal rather than profit.

reply to post by The Savage Khan

Think of all the things we could accomplish together with human prosperity as our ultimate goal rather than profit.

But will the elites allow us to achieve prosperity rather than they profit?

Check it out:



I really dont think so. Sad, but true.

Use of bacteriological weapons.

New 'superbug' found in UK hospitals

Perhaps this new bacteria is just a test for what is comming.

The idea of a world government is fine, however I am skeptical that a majority of the people put environmental issues to the forefront over monetary gains. A war between the rich and poor would be needed as well. I see more or less the point the video was making, that it is a war of information, with the internet being a valuable resource to all.

reply to post by The Endtime Warrior


I dont kwow if the point its a war of information. I think that will be a war about knowledge and understanding. Even if this knowledge and understanding is the wrong one. You see, they control all the ways to force to this, science, technology and even philosophy. They have weapons that the most o people will not be prepared to face or confront...

reply to post by RUSSO


Well the internet is a tool for the information and from that comes knowledge and understanding. who controls the internet has the power. I think we are in agreement just speaking about different aspects about it.

reply to post by The Endtime Warrior


Indeed.

reply to post by wisintel


When you see the videos, i will like to know you oppinion.

Thanks in advance.