why the CALIFORNIA object may have not been a plane

This is strong data that the object off the coast of LA was not a plane


look at this video

delta rocket 2 ...Notice the fireball on the bottom ...Now after u watch this video....Look at the image of the california so called plane ....then look at the contrail this boy gives off


www.youtube.com...

reply to post by williamAmerican


seriously? another thread on this? Why cant we discuss this in the multiple other threads that have already been started on this subject? I find it more convenient when all or most of us are under one or two threads brainstorming together instead of spreading our ideas out so thin across so many threads.

-Alien

reply to post by williamAmerican


I believe the LA case was something more than a simple jet contrail, however, this video is not convincing at all and doesn't resemble the LA contrail.

reply to post by williamAmerican


1) this proves the object near LA was not a rocket/missile. rockets and missile have a continuously illuminated tail. The object near LA was NOT continuously illuminated, it was only illuminated for a short period of time because it was only reflecting light in the camera for a short period of time.

2) That is not a "contrail" from the rocket, that is a smoke plume. Contrails are condensed water trails. Rockets dont condense water at low altitudes.

There is no reason for another topic on this. You don't bring anything new to the table...

On going discussion here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Please post comments there.

Thread closed.