It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
reply to post by NeoAstra
Right, I would say start banning people for a small amount of time, then gradually increase the time for every offense after that?
or maybe a three strike rule for flamers,
flame once: 24 hour ban
twice: 3 day ban
third time: infinite ban.
dunno, just my two cents
I THINK U SHOULD BE THE FIRST TO GET BANNED,LETS TRY YOUR NEW IDEA OUT AND SEE IF IT WORKS..SHALL WE.
edit on 15-11-2010 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)
Because not everyone has the same views, if you're one of those who doesn't agree with the threads comments, you are blatantly attacked and judged?
It's truly a shame that the freedom of speech is no longer recognized.
Nuke'em all let God sort'em out!
By doing so, would eradicate a worthless country thus removing a worthless people known to cause cancer in rats~
I mean come on, what does Afghanistan really have to offer, except for poppy seeds used for illegal drugs
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
reply to post by NeoAstra
Perfect example of what i am talking about...
unnecessary attitude,
posting in all caps..
And i dont think there is a "we" in this immortal, let alone a "you"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
u have been here a little over a year and started 5 threads and u have the nerve to talk about banning some one and changing whats been gong on the ats for along time..whats your point to this thread , why not start with u,its your idea?
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
U know what, i am on 13 other forums every day between 10pm and 1am every day,and for the last month i have enlisted over 30 other members from 4 other sites to this one and they love it and we all have a good time being on here.let the moderators do there job with out any indirect threads from somebody that it seems to me is only a slacker with 5 threads in a years time.I like this thread its good but your porfolio and application does not meet the standards of real complaining.its just not up to par with the immortal one.sorry.
edit on 15-11-2010 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by budski
And it's their website, and it is member driven - so if members don't like it, it's their perogative to go elsewhere, or like it (or not like it but accept it )
No one makes anyone3 else post here, so....y'know if you don't like it, don't do it...
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Firstly, there's nothing wrong with ATS. But there is something "wrong" with some of the people who post on ATS, and the root problem is the reflexive rudeness posting on the Internet brings out in many people.
If you support free expression, then all of this should make sense to you. It may seem like a reach, but it applies. Being an advocate of free expression means being able to embrace the expression of ideas that drive you crazy. And being an advocate of free expression on ATS means doing so without revealing you've fallen prey to Internet posting habits and styles. Grace and civility must prevail, even when presented with awkward disrespect.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Freedom of speech is very easily defined.
>snip<
I dont see any limitations mentioned within, do you?
Originally posted by Mizzijr
I honestly think there are kids under the age of 18 joining the forums... possibly under 17..