It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neonitus
That describes just about every ufo pic or vid.
Originally posted by neonitus
I agree that live cams arent a good place to look for ufo's, but i dont think a blanket dismissal of everything they show is right, just because someone thought lights on a hill were aliens.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
Originally posted by crowdedskies
Secondly, who are the experts and experienced researchers that you are referring to? You should realise that any witness is actually as good as, if not better than, the so-called experienced researcher (especially if the researchers themselves have had no encounters and are just theorising)
ME.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
1: You are not there to personally witness it.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
Sadly, I know.. Every UFO pic or vid is very bad and inconclusive. This is because real UFOs are actually very rare. All that is ever seen are semi UFO which are just out of focus and blurry objects that could be anything. Semi UFOs are only UFOs because they are out of focus and blurry and inconclusive.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
1: You are not there to personally witness it.
So if I am say watching the web cam at Yellowstone park waiting for the geysers to erupt...
and say a big foot strolls by and gets caught on that camera...
You mean that would not have any value?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
Sadly, I know.. Every UFO pic or vid is very bad and inconclusive. This is because real UFOs are actually very rare. All that is ever seen are semi UFO which are just out of focus and blurry objects that could be anything. Semi UFOs are only UFOs because they are out of focus and blurry and inconclusive.
Ummm okay flawed logic here "every UFO pic is inconclusive" Well if it was conclusive it wouldn't be a real UFO picture... it would be an IFO
Originally posted by zorgon
Anything that moves in the sky that is not identified is a real UFO until it is conclusively identified as a balloon or bird or even alien spacecraft.
Originally posted by zorgon
But your crusade won't work... your trying to reach those with no life other than sitting staring at web cams
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
1) UFO that is only unidentified because it is lacking detail, and you can't identify it based on visual data. (billions of those exist)
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
How do you know it was big foot and not some guy in a suit? You don't, you were not there. The video would be useless and only cause endless debate.
well all just turn off the computer and go outside and do something