It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BuffaloJoe
Some thoughts to digest...
- Top 10% : Pay 70% of nations taxes
- Top 1% : Pay 38% of nations taxes
- Bottom 50% : Pay 0% of nations taxes
- Bottom 50% : are actually paid to be citizens
- Minimum wage and homeless people do not create jobs
- Heirs to large amounts of $ are ultimately the benefactors of someone else's hard work and smart financial practices. If they choose to spend it making their family financially independent rather than at Walmart, is it really wrong. Was it the beneficiaries fault?
What part of this is unfair?
Personally I fall in just above the bottom 50% but I never want to see the ability to reach the top 10% taken away. Infringing on ROI only diminishes entrepreneurial motivation. That is bad for the economy that we all share.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by kykweer
reply to post by SaturnFX
Well then who is to blame?
Blame?...there is nobody to blame...if you give me a chance, I will grab a dollar no matter how many dollars I have...this is our nature..we are hoarders.
The blame is the concept itself...capitalism is a good motivator, however, pure capitalism is destructive as it allows for class collapse over time.
You can't seriously be saying anyone not super rich must be a idiot..are you a rothchild? a rockafeller? doubtful..does that make you stupid and uneducated?
You were born into a old system that has long since grown past the everyone has a chance stage...initially capitalism is great because indeed everyone does...and for a few generations, people really do have the hard work = financial success...but after a hundred or two years of running, you get this result....a child born into a low/middle class family will have a easier time sprouting wings and flying than working hard to get rich...and its actually not too bad now...come back in 100 years if things keep unregulated and the rich protected.
You can argue that a right wing approach to protect the rich is the right thing to do, but as the expression goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Originally posted by peck420
reply to post by ClintK
If you are a business owner you should be incorporated already.
Only a fool would not setup protection for their personal assets, and incoroprating your business provides that protection.
As for stocks that pay dividends...they are sold at the stock market available to anyone for purchase.
What stops you from buying those stocks?
Originally posted by peck420
I drive a mazda, most of my friends drive vehicles of slightly higher caliber. Is it their fault? Nope, it is mine, I choose to spend my money on things other than a vehicle. They choose to buy nicer cars.
I just searched "stocks that pay dividends" on google. 8,190,000 results.
Originally posted by peck420
reply to post by aching_knuckles
Have you looked into co-ownership with a structured bye out, provided by a private investor?
Originally posted by BuffaloJoe
reply to post by ClintK
Apparently, you need to do more research.
Who pays what taxes
Nearly half of US households pay no federal tax
Originally posted by ClintK
What stops me? How about, like most in the middle class, I can't afford to be buying stocks after taxes, my 403B, a mortgage, utility bills and feeding 5 kids.
It doesn't matter that anyone can legally buy them. I never said they couldn't. But middle class people don't have the money to buy enough of them that it makes any real difference on their on their income unless they buy them for 4 or 5 DECADES with every spare penny they had. And they still wouldn't be RICH.
Originally posted by peck420
So it is the rich man's fault for him being rich and you being poor?
You have a mortgage, utilities, and food taking up so much of your income that you have nothing left?
You have essential stated that you have squandered your earnings, and are therefore, intitled to some of his.
That is what raising his taxes to subsidise (lower) yours is in effect doing.
I would like to say that I don't mean to be crass, but I do. I have no problems living well within my means, why should I get punished because you can't do the same?
Originally posted by peck420
Originally posted by ClintK
What stops me? How about, like most in the middle class, I can't afford to be buying stocks after taxes, my 403B, a mortgage, utility bills and feeding 5 kids.
It doesn't matter that anyone can legally buy them. I never said they couldn't. But middle class people don't have the money to buy enough of them that it makes any real difference on their on their income unless they buy them for 4 or 5 DECADES with every spare penny they had. And they still wouldn't be RICH.
So it is the rich man's fault for him being rich and you being poor?
You have a mortgage, utilities, and food taking up so much of your income that you have nothing left?
You have essential stated that you have squandered your earnings, and are therefore, intitled to some of his.
Originally posted by Chai_An
Buy stocks, buy stocks. How often do stocks lose their value? Stock in a company can be $20 today and a $1 tomorrow, you can't count on the stock market.
Originally posted by kykweer
Originally posted by Chai_An
Buy stocks, buy stocks. How often do stocks lose their value? Stock in a company can be $20 today and a $1 tomorrow, you can't count on the stock market.
I guess thats why all successful investors have a portfolio and invest in numerous companies.