It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Incident at Exeter: The Norman Muscarello UFO Case

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 8 2010 @ 12:22 PM
link   
Incident at Exeter, NH

Very intriguing case...it involves a series of sightings officially qualified as a legitimate visit from an unidentified flying object. Enjoy...


Norman Muscarello, a teenage Navy recruit, was walking down a quiet country highway at night, when suddenly, a huge object loomed above him. Thus began the "Incident at Exeter," a series of sightings officially qualified as "unidentified." The encounters that night took special precedence over other UFO sightings because of the credibility of two Exeter police officers who also saw the UFO, as well as that of the dispatcher and supervising officer who first heard Muscarello's account.


 
Mod Edit: External Source Tags Instructions – Please Review This Link.
edit on 8/11/2010 by ArMaP because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2010 @ 12:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Medieval1028
 


Unfortunately, it is hard to say that this can be positively identified as an "official encounter" with a flying object, since we don't have much to go on.

Do I think they are full of it? No.

But that is a far as this can really be discussed intelligently, really. With nothing else to go on, nothing else to really investigate the only thing you can tie this too is other witness reports and the like....nothing that really sheds light on stuff like this.

I would imagine that in these modern times there would be thousands of cases to spend time on, with much better evidence to boot. But alas, that doesn't seem to be the case.

It is almost easier for folks to dig up old cases and discuss them, rather than to bother with some of the stuff that is modern and easily explainable. At least if it is old and nothing but words on a paper you can imagine anything any the world and it is truly "undebunkable"



posted on Nov, 8 2010 @ 12:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
reply to post by Medieval1028
 


Unfortunately, it is hard to say that this can be positively identified as an "official encounter" with a flying object, since we don't have much to go on.

Do I think they are full of it? No.

But that is a far as this can really be discussed intelligently, really. With nothing else to go on, nothing else to really investigate the only thing you can tie this too is other witness reports and the like....nothing that really sheds light on stuff like this.

I would imagine that in these modern times there would be thousands of cases to spend time on, with much better evidence to boot. But alas, that doesn't seem to be the case.

It is almost easier for folks to dig up old cases and discuss them, rather than to bother with some of the stuff that is modern and easily explainable. At least if it is old and nothing but words on a paper you can imagine anything any the world and it is truly "undebunkable"


I'll tell you why old cases (well, some anyway) are more compelling than many modern 'easily debunked' cases - there was no CGI in those days, no youtube to download 'videos' onto in order to get 5 mins of fame. Sure, there are probably hundreds of old sightings from back then that were fabrications - but some were truly unexplained (hence Unidentified Flying Object, not Alien Space Craft).

Two police officers are credible witnesses - to lump everyone in as an eyewitness and therefore unreliable is naive. Also, these older cases have had years in which experts could debunk them but they haven't been able to. I'm not saying that they are all aliens popping down to say hello, but its a possibility. Unless you are the sort of person who believes 100% that there is no intelligent life other then on earth, and even if there was they wouldn't bother to visit us anyway then these accounts should be kept in the possibly pile.



posted on Nov, 8 2010 @ 12:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
It is almost easier for folks to dig up old cases and discuss them, rather than to bother with some of the stuff that is modern and easily explainable. At least if it is old and nothing but words on a paper you can imagine anything any the world and it is truly "undebunkable"


True. With the old cases, many times there's no new data to gather, so you're stuck with whatever story is left. Pretty hard to come up with alternate explanations when you don't have any more available facts. Not that everything can be debunked if you have more data. But even here, the story doesn't really prove anything, does it? Most of the witnesses couldn't even tell what shape the thing was. Just that it was a bunch of bright red lights. It's just another case on the unexplained pile, that fails to really add anything to the subject.



posted on Nov, 8 2010 @ 01:24 PM
link   
Looks like the ship was low enough to be seen.
Comparable to the Belgian Triangle and Hudson Valley and Rex Heflin sightings.
So we know 'officially' unknown ship exist from the lying government because
the government has control of scientific information and anything used on its
land and by its people.
And will tax you any way possible.
So not only unknown ships but un taxable.
Something smells like the illuminati.
Then it is the Illuminati.



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join