Photo: Large Disc UFO / OVNI - Carmarthenshire, Wales - 11/5/2010

reply to post by XPLodER
It could be either, as i stated earlier it is either coming together or going apart. The craft is made up of living organisms, if you look closely you can make make out their faces. The entities themselves float or levitate so it is not really an issue whether it is on the ground or not. I believe it to be in the air but that is just an opinion that is shaded by the nature of the entities not by their limitations.

Looks like the aliens are messing with people's minds again. Will it ever end?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7fb7d6eac528.gif[/atsimg]
One for the kiddies.

reply to post by groingrinder
As i recall, you had to remove that groingrinder at least once before. Snide remarks have a way of coming back on you on ATS. Might want to address that before it becomes an issue.

reply to post by debris765nju


Don't you think the aliens know exactly what they are doing? Don't you think they could reveal themselves to each and every one of us should they choose? Instead of blurry pictures that show not much of anything, creatures with the tech to cross entire galaxies at will could ensure we have razor sharp exposures. Do you think they are NOT messing with anyone's mind?

It is clear in my mind that there is a deception going on with regards to aliens, who may well end up being demons. Why would they tell us that they bred us from apes and invented religion so we would behave ourselves? Are they trying to shake our faith in God by claiming that they are God?

Fallen angels are purely spirit. They cannot have a physical body like ours. Maybe they have invented a "science" that gives them bodies to inhabit just so they can come here and mess with our minds?

reply to post by Medieval1028


Medieval~
This is a good photo!
4.bp.blogspot.com...


I am at 'work' right now...
just not working... lol
and i just showed this to one of the old timers [astronomer]..

He is as lost as I am,
I was looking at it trying to figure it out, so I showed him.
he said..
"huh, that really is odd" lol

You can see stars above and beneath it.
or are we mistaken?

your word feels genuine enough to me..
So Ill just go with my gut and say , damn! Niice catch! lol
What else could it be? Besides an air/spacecraft?

man, it's almost like you can see "rooms" inside. lol,
I dunno..
weird.
Thanks for sharing!

reply to post by Ahmose


I was wondering about them being stars, however a fair bit of the country had rain last night so i figure they could be tiny drops of moisture?

If it's genuine and it's a huge if, this is going to be a very famous photo. It's going to be world wide inside 2-3 days whatever the facts are.

reply to post by groingrinder
Actually they can't reveal themselves, they're basically invisible. Even when someone comes along who can reveal them, someone tries to supplant that reality with a "plausibility." Sorry i made you feel defensive about your "offensive" alien. Just trying to save you some grief and improve the appearance of the thread. Children you know.

reply to post by groingrinder
Let me answer the" fallen angels" issue first. God destroyed those beings with the flood along with their giant offspring. The book of Enoch tells the story of those Angels trying to get Enoch to intercede with God for them, to spare them from the Flood in Noah' time. Demons have nothing to do with fallen angels, they are the offspring of Lilith, the first wife of Adam. She refused to be dominated and left, God caused her to be the mother of all demons.. 100 of her offspring were doomed to die each day because of her disobedience.

Originally posted by FireMoon
reply to post by Ahmose

 

I was wondering about them being stars, however a fair bit of the country had rain last night so i figure they could be tiny drops of moisture?

If it's genuine and it's a huge if, this is going to be a very famous photo. It's going to be world wide inside 2-3 days whatever the facts are.

yeah sure, they could be moisture,
but i would think they would look more like the typical "orb" or "bokeh" effect usually caused by water/moisture/light,
Kinda like the big "orb" on that photo, to the far right in the middle, cut in half.
That looks like water,
the other things, I dont really know..
could be water, could be stars, who knows.. lol
very interesting though...

Yes,these are stars. I have 2 other photos and the stars show on these as well....

Getting anything out of those photos is a huge ask, its hard enough to make out what is terrestial let alone a 'huge disc'.

All I see is out of focus stuff and a camera zoom artifact.

Slightly enhanced and cropped ...

I still don't see anything - there is a sort of disc shape, but had the word not been used I would have not 'seen' it.

Meh..


The thread author, who also owns the blog on which the images were posted, sent us a properly-formed DMCA Take-Down notice regarding the re-use of the images provided to him. As a result, we have complied by remove the re-use and derivative use of the images from his blog that was used to create the opening post.

reply to post by Mclaneinc


With respect had you read the thread through, you would see it all explained

reply to post by Medieval1028


I see no disc-shaped object here.

All I can see is a night time photo of a distant fenced and floodlit depot with a vehicle parked inside.

The "stars", I'd say, are airborne particles caught in the flash.

Could rank as one of the silliest "UFO" photos ever!

reply to post by Medieval1028


In the article posted by the OP (near the bottom) a cell phone video capture was provided of the sighting, since it has yet to be added to this thread, I figured now would be a good a time as any to help move things along.




ETA: This is the Video Description on youtube, which does not match the OP's title to the thread.

Video was taken by Maria M. Rivera on the morning of June 11, 2008, at approximately 2:52am. She was alone in her living room when she suddenly got a feeling that she should go outside onto the balcony and there it was again. Her camcorder was not in the immediate area, but luckily she had her cellphone with her. It appeared to be a saucer shape object similar to the one she'd seen previously, with lights around it. It was hovering motionless.

Originally posted by FireMoon
reply to post by Mclaneinc

 

With respect had you read the thread through, you would see it all explained

Yup you are right, I missed what you said...My apologies, too many meds and not enough sleep

If that is the underside of it then its massive alright, sadly it does give the impression of looking like a car park at night.

The author of this thread has objected to the use by ATS members of the images contained on his blog and referenced in the opening post.

In order to comply with his request, please do not link-to or display the images on ATS.

Thank you.

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
The author of this thread has objected to the use by ATS members of the images contained on his blog and referenced in the opening post.

In order to comply with his request, please do not link-to or display the images on ATS.

Thank you.

ok.... why be the OP and then .... ok weird.... thread ignored.

Well that is very sad. On the one hand i understand if the owner thinks they have hit paydirt why the hell should newspapers worldwide sell copies off the back of something they haven;t paid for. However, on a site like this which is not geared towards overt commercial ventures they could have shown some more leeway.

My experience is this. If you go the copyright route you are just going to find the bellicose end of the debunkers market are going to rip you a new fundament for doing so and refuse to even acknowledge the possibility the pictures could be genuine from the word go. Instead of discussing the pictures credibility they will end up discussing their own motives 90% of the time. Gawd help the person if they even have a citation for jay walking. the likes of Randi will have them butchering children for ceremonial purposes before the newspapers are even on the streets.

A lot us us in the music biz have contracts where we specify the moment a work is used for commercial purposes or in a commercial context then all due monies shall be paid at risk of legal action should they not be forthcoming. I see no reason why the OP could not have done likewise here.

This is the photo posted by Xploder, it is the same craft as the one removed, just not the same photograph. The comments i made on the removed photo's apply to this one too.