Is Vortex Based Math the Key to the 21st century and salvation?

Ok, first name on the list:

Russell P. Blake Former Senior Researcher Microsoft Research

Russel P Blake is not and never was a 'Senior Researcher' for the Microsoft Corporation. I am basing this on the fact that he did not attend the University of Wisconsin, Madison and has no academic publications in any field. Nor is a Russell P. Blake mentioned explicitly by the Microsoft Corporation in any public corporate documents.

Lo and suprise, a quick google of his name yields... yup, no mention of Microsoft other than sites quoting Mr Vortex's website. Pretty unusual for "top scientist and senior researcher at Microsoft". Nor are there any publications in his name. Again, pretty unusual for a scientist, especially none other than a supposed top researcher at Microsoft.

I give up

Originally posted by john_bmth
Ok, first name on the list:

Russell P. Blake Former Senior Researcher Microsoft Research

Russel P Blake is not and never was a 'Senior Researcher' for the Microsoft Corporation. I am basing this on the fact that he did not attend the University of Wisconsin, Madison and has no academic publications in any field. Nor is a Russell P. Blake mentioned explicitly by the Microsoft Corporation in any public corporate documents.

Lo and suprise, a quick google of his name yields... yup, no mention of Microsoft other than sites quoting Mr Vortex's website. Pretty unusual for "top scientist and senior researcher at Microsoft". Nor are there any publications in his name. Again, pretty unusual for a scientist, especially none other than a supposed top researcher at Microsoft.

I give up

edit on 5-11-2010 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)

You're pretty lousy at what you... do... Perhaps I don't need to read your academic work after all because you're lacking so thoroughly in the research department.

Russ Blake:

academic.research.microsoft.com...
www.linkedin.com...


Pretty sad when you can't track down a linkedin account. Borderline pathetic actually...

reply to post by Americanist


That Microsoft site is an academic repository. It lists publications from all sorts of journals and conferences. It is NOT a list of Microsoft employees! So, even if we pretended that this was the Russel P. Blake on Mr Vortex's site, where is his link to Mr Vortex, other than Mr Vortex's website?

Hey, Einstein endorses my work. Look, he's a real person: en.wikipedia.org...

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Americanist

 

That Microsoft site is an academic repository. It lists publications from all sorts of journals and conferences. It is NOT a list of Microsoft employees! So, even if we pretended that this was the Russel P. Blake on Mr Vortex's site, where is his link to Mr Vortex, other than Mr Vortex's website?

edit on 5-11-2010 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)

Backtrack all you want. As I stated earlier... You lost your "cred" on page one of this thread. Instead of trying to argue... Learn to debate first.

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Americanist

 

Hey, Einstein endorses my work. Look, he's a real person: en.wikipedia.org...

edit on 5-11-2010 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)

Now you're being re-donk-culous. I'm glad you can successfully find wikipedia on the internet though. It's a helpful research tool for future reference.

reply to post by Americanist

Backtracking? I changed my position to accommodate the fact that "Russ Blake" may actually be a real person. So, even if he did work at Microsoft, where is the Mr Vortex connection? Bearing in mind that I've let slide his complete fabrication of "publications" and that paper from the mickey mouse journal you posted for the time being! All in all, I think I'm being quite accommodating

So if I make a website and stick "Endorsed by such and such" that makes it true, does it?

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Americanist

 

Backtracking?

I changed my position to accommodate the fact that "Russ Blake" may actually be a real person. So, even if he did work at Microsoft, where is the Mr Vortex connection?

markorodin.com...

Originally posted by Americanist

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Americanist

 

Backtracking?

I changed my position to accommodate the fact that "Russ Blake" may actually be a real person. So, even if he did work at Microsoft, where is the Mr Vortex connection?

markorodin.com...

Oh, I see! The link is... Mr Vortex's website! How convenient the paper trail starts and ends there

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Americanist

 

Backtracking?

I changed my position to accommodate the fact that "Russ Blake" may actually be a real person. So, even if he did work at Microsoft, where is the Mr Vortex connection? Bearing in mind that I've let slide his complete fabrication of "publications" and that paper from the mickey mouse journal you posted for the time being! All in all, I think I'm being quite accommodating

So if I make a website and stick "Endorsed by such and such" that makes it true, does it?

edit on 5-11-2010 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)

You're confusing Frank Znidarsic with Marko Rodin. Two different people... Both way ahead of their time. Especially with people like you in the World.

Originally posted by john_bmth

Originally posted by Americanist

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Americanist

 

Backtracking?

I changed my position to accommodate the fact that "Russ Blake" may actually be a real person. So, even if he did work at Microsoft, where is the Mr Vortex connection?

markorodin.com...

Oh, I see! The link is... Mr Vortex's website! How convenient the paper trail starts and ends there

Russ Blake... I provided his background in a previous post. You were obviously searching for Russel Blake with little success.

Originally posted by Americanist

Originally posted by john_bmth

Originally posted by Americanist

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Americanist

 

Backtracking?

I changed my position to accommodate the fact that "Russ Blake" may actually be a real person. So, even if he did work at Microsoft, where is the Mr Vortex connection?

markorodin.com...

Oh, I see! The link is... Mr Vortex's website! How convenient the paper trail starts and ends there

Russ Blake... I provided his background in a previous post. You were obviously searching for Russel Blake with little success.

I've sent an email to Russ Blake (from that linkedin profile) asking if he endorses Mr Vortex. I shall post the response.

Originally posted by john_bmth

Originally posted by Americanist

Originally posted by john_bmth

Originally posted by Americanist

Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by Americanist

 

Backtracking?

I changed my position to accommodate the fact that "Russ Blake" may actually be a real person. So, even if he did work at Microsoft, where is the Mr Vortex connection?

markorodin.com...

Oh, I see! The link is... Mr Vortex's website! How convenient the paper trail starts and ends there

Russ Blake... I provided his background in a previous post. You were obviously searching for Russel Blake with little success.

I've sent an email to Russ Blake (from that linkedin profile) asking if he endorses Mr Vortex. I shall post the response.

Glad to see you're taking some initiative. Later on make sure to view the 44pt lecture series Marko had recorded some 20 years ago. It's a good place to start.

Is Vortex Based Math the Key to the 21st century and salvation?

No, it sounds more like the key to a cult, lol.

If this theory becomes practical, it would explain more things then any other theories can put together. This would be another step closer to finding the ultimate unified theory.

I've read through the site, understood the basic theory and mathematics, yet to go through the videos but wow is what comes to my mind. If applications becomes a reality, then A LOT of the world's problems and issues would be solved.

Guess we’ll all have to wait and see how true and credible this guy really is.

Also, if anyone wants to read the more mathematical side, here is a write up from Russell P Blakes aka the Microsoft Researcher. Not sure if this is the real deal but here is the link.

www.vortexmath.com...

Originally posted by Americanist

Russell P. Blake
Former Senior Researcher
Microsoft Research

Dr. Hans A Neiper
Dr. Len Horowitz

Dennis Watts
Thomas Bearden

Prof. Scot C. Nelson

So you hold more credibility than these individuals?

I think it would be hard not to. My cat probably has more credibility than most of them. None of these people are mathematicians or physicists. Why can't he find a single mathematician?

Russell P Blake - well, he used to be a software engineer at MS. If he actually does endorse it, then he's probably the 2nd best of the bunch, which is pretty weak. I can't find any mention outside of Rodin's site of him endorsing the work.

Hans Alfred Nieper - appears to be some German quack doctor

Len Horowitz - another quack.

is a former dentist, a health industry entrepreneur, and the author of a number of books, pamphlets, DVDs, CDs and articles on public health issues; the books and pamphlets have been published under his own Tetrahedron imprint. Horowitz is an AIDS conspiracy theorist and opposes vaccination.

from wiki

This guys supports any old BS that gets hits on his website, so he hawk more crappy DVDs. Maybe he does, Rodin's teeth? I wouldn't let him near my mouth, that's for sure.

Denis Watts -

Dennis "Den" Watts is a fictional character from the BBC soap opera EastEnders, played by actor Leslie Grantham. He became well-known for his tabloid nickname, "Dirty Den".

Well, if he has Dirty Den's approval, that's good enough for me.

Thomas Bearden - ah, he always crops up with this sort of crap. Old loon who thinks the Yakuza are trying to assassinate him with energy weapons, as he revealed their plot to disrupt weather patterns off the East coast of the US. Or something.

Prof. Scot C. Nelson - well, this guy does seem to be a well qualified plant pathologist. However the only place that his name is associated with Rodin, is Rodin's own web site. You can see the sort of work he is interested in on his site:

sites.google.com...

Not surprisingly, given his profession, it's all about plant diseases. No mention of "my work over the past 5 years with the mathematics of music and botany" mentioned on Rodin's site. For all we know, Rodin just made it up.

Hey, maybe there is something interesting in Rodin's stuff, amongst all the BS. If so, why doesn't he publish to a well respected, peer review journal, like the International Journal of Mathematics (IJM)?

Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke

Originally posted by Americanist

Russell P. Blake
Former Senior Researcher
Microsoft Research

Dr. Hans A Neiper
Dr. Len Horowitz

Dennis Watts
Thomas Bearden

Prof. Scot C. Nelson

So you hold more credibility than these individuals?

I think it would be hard not to. My cat probably has more credibility than most of them. None of these people are mathematicians or physicists. Why can't he find a single mathematician?

Russell P Blake - well, he used to be a software engineer at MS. If he actually does endorse it, then he's probably the 2nd best of the bunch, which is pretty weak. I can't find any mention outside of Rodin's site of him endorsing the work.

Hans Alfred Nieper - appears to be some German quack doctor

Len Horowitz - another quack.

is a former dentist, a health industry entrepreneur, and the author of a number of books, pamphlets, DVDs, CDs and articles on public health issues; the books and pamphlets have been published under his own Tetrahedron imprint. Horowitz is an AIDS conspiracy theorist and opposes vaccination.

from wiki

This guys supports any old BS that gets hits on his website, so he hawk more crappy DVDs. Maybe he does, Rodin's teeth? I wouldn't let him near my mouth, that's for sure.

Denis Watts -

Dennis "Den" Watts is a fictional character from the BBC soap opera EastEnders, played by actor Leslie Grantham. He became well-known for his tabloid nickname, "Dirty Den".

Well, if he has Dirty Den's approval, that's good enough for me.

Thomas Bearden - ah, he always crops up with this sort of crap. Old loon who thinks the Yakuza are trying to assassinate him with energy weapons, as he revealed their plot to disrupt weather patterns off the East coast of the US. Or something.

Prof. Scot C. Nelson - well, this guy does seem to be a well qualified plant pathologist. However the only place that his name is associated with Rodin, is Rodin's own web site. You can see the sort of work he is interested in on his site:

sites.google.com...

Not surprisingly, given his profession, it's all about plant diseases. No mention of "my work over the past 5 years with the mathematics of music and botany" mentioned on Rodin's site. For all we know, Rodin just made it up.

Hey, maybe there is something interesting in Rodin's stuff, amongst all the BS. If so, why doesn't he publish to a well respected, peer review journal, like the International Journal of Mathematics (IJM)?

There's always a person in the bunch jumping into the conversation being a pussy... I mean mentioning their own pussy. I'll do some research on Dennis Watts, but my initial reaction is to call you out. Much the same as I did your buddy claiming Russel Blake doesn't exist. In 20 seconds I had his linkedin page.

Tom Bearden holds intimate knowledge of electrical circuitry... Your bashing does nothing but highlight personal ignorance.

Len Horowitz is a superstar when it comes to biology which is a subject most likely foreign to you. If you shared his level of research, I'd leave you with more talking points, but for now all you get is a push in the right direction. Do your homework on Merck.

Prof. Scot C. Nelson... Does an endorser have to mirror their endorsement on a personal website? I think you're making up some sort of code of ethics at this point. More than likely he presents links that cater to his background.

Yes, perhaps there is something quite interesting about Rodin's work as a number map/ code similar to what you'd find coding software/ programs. The thing about his research ultimately... The core of it is rediscovery. He didn't invent the pattern. Where he should receive credit is in tracking all the nuances for practical applications as well as tying in universal theory.

This type of research shouldn't require peer review when Einstein is dead, and all we're left with is Stephen Hawking. Rodin's support is building underground where great music is normally dispensed. Live a more sheltered life why don't you... Might explain your pussy response above.

reply to post by Americanist

Sorry, not sure what much of your post was about, but to say:

Len Horowitz is a superstar when it comes to biology

Is hilarious. He's an ex-dentist who sells miracle cures on the web. Including:

Breath of the Earth Hawaiian Holy Water - $24. Yes, that's right. A bottle of water for $24.

or how about Holy Harmony Perfect Circle of Sound Tuning Forks at $188.

Prof. Scot C. Nelson... Does an endorser have to mirror their endorsement on a personal website? I think you're making up some sort of code of ethics at this point. More than likely he presents links that cater to his background.

That's not really my point. The point is that it's only Rodin who says the Prof endorses him. I could set up a website and say Prof. Scot C. Nelson endorses this post - would that give it more weight for you?

Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
reply to post by Americanist

 

Sorry, not sure what much of your post was about, but to say:

Len Horowitz is a superstar when it comes to biology

Is hilarious. He's an ex-dentist who sells miracle cures on the web. Including:

Breath of the Earth Hawaiian Holy Water - $24. Yes, that's right. A bottle of water for $24.

or how about Holy Harmony Perfect Circle of Sound Tuning Forks at $188.

Prof. Scot C. Nelson... Does an endorser have to mirror their endorsement on a personal website? I think you're making up some sort of code of ethics at this point. More than likely he presents links that cater to his background.

That's not really my point. The point is that it's only Rodin who says the Prof endorses him. I could set up a website and say Prof. Scot C. Nelson endorses this post - would that give it more weight for you?

You fail to realize there's a huge market for water. Bottles in excess of $80 are common throughout the World. Especially for those with finances to afford it. Hawaii is no different. It's a tourist haven. In addition, Horowitz has also researched nano-silver and electrification of the blood for ridding diseases. I'd suggest you do a little further digging. I would recommend only a certain size of particle be ingested after doing my own research, but I'd certainly endorse colloidal silver and electrification in combination.

In a Universe constructed entirely of wave function your remaining comment towards music shows the novice in you. When you're able to enlighten us... Feel free to chime in.

Otherwise, I point to your ignorance on most topics of discussion.

reply to post by Americanist


Are you familiar with Viktor Schauberger's work? He wasn't a mathemetician per se but he was the guy who really figured all this out before anyone, IMO. At least before anyone in modern times.

Coincidentally, Schauberger also predicted things like the cancer epidemic we see today and water costing more than fuel etc. (these predictions were mocked at the time, supposedly) I also just read something about Schauberger electirfying the body and it killing disease. Did this biologist you mention get this idea from him?

Also, according to some, schauberger was the real mastermind behind the "Nazi UFOs" and even the jet engine which were supposedly ideas stolen from him. From what I have read of Schauberger's teaching i am starting to believe all of it. He was way ahead of his time.

Originally posted by 8311-XHT
reply to post by Americanist

 

Are you familiar with Viktor Schauberger's work? He wasn't a mathemetician per se but he was the guy who really figured all this out before anyone, IMO. At least before anyone in modern times.

Coincidentally, Schauberger also predicted things like the cancer epidemic we see today and water costing more than fuel etc. (these predictions were mocked at the time, supposedly) I also just read something about Schauberger electirfying our the body and it killing disease. Did this biologist you mention get this idea from him?

Also, according to some, schuaberger was the real mstermind behind the "Nazi UFOs" and even the jet engine which were supposedly ideas stolen from him. From what I have read of Schauberger's teaching i am starting to believe all of it. He was way ahead of his time.

Len Horowitz is the equivalent of a sponge. He soaks up information in various fields. He's also quite the detective. I might have run across Schauberger's research on youtube. I went old school though... Back to Stubblefield, Keely, and Tesla. I find it odd that throughout history this type discourse was either met with the death sentence or at the very least ridicule. Even Plato had to fear for his own life.

Here's a great site to get involved in:


New Research on Plato and Pythagoras

As far as blood electrification is concerned... The first I heard of its use was via Bob Beck.




I'll get after more on Schauberger. I'd suggest you go this route for the time being...

Dale Pond - Keely, SVP
Marko Rodin - (look for a 44pt Lecture Series) Vortex Math Model
Nassim Haramein - Vector Based Geometry