Purchasing the British Government - Foundation X

you know, if it was 5 billion, there's probably no telling. Could have been Bill and Melinda Gates.
Everyone in the US running around THINKING they are rich, fretting over tax cuts - most of em, they ain't rich, they just think they are rich. There's one dude in Mumbai that is building a 1 billion dollar skyscraper home. I guess so he can put himself as far as possible over the millions that are starving below him.

There are some super, super rich folks- just private folks that have amassed more wealth than they could ever, ever spend. I can't even imagine.

fsa registered company- guesses

124451 - N M Rothschild & Sons Ltd

Current status: Authorised
Effective Date: 01/12/2001

114054 - Lazard & Co Limited

Current status: Authorised
Effective Date: 01/12/2001

You can see the video of the speech from parliament here, from around 2:34:00 into the session: Parliament TV

The BBC video player is a bit cranky, if you move the slider so it's just before the word 'EMBED' you'll be in about the right place

Goldenchild

This is incredible if true. Incredible and disturbing. No one would buy a country out of debt for nothing in return. Maybe it is in return for strategic positioning inside our waters or an economic ruse.
If it IS the Vatican I would imagine they would want to reinstate religion on a bigger footing here. They would see a return that way over the years and it would be financially viable in the long term. The whole schools and hospitals thing would be to sucker people into believing the donor is benevolent in their intentions, whoever they are.

In effect, no matter who it is, we would be expected to be "grateful" I'll bet, at our benefactors beck and call.

Hehe, just read on Reuters that they're claiming to have 7 trillion of gold at the 1920 gold standard. Which if I'm reading this correctly is/was 21 dollars an ounce

Here's the Reuters link blogs.reuters.com...

Correction - Reuters claims the 7 trillion but not the 1920's gold standard reference. That's found on just about every other website running the story

If both were correct that would give a figure in the region of 460 trillion in todays money - seems an inconceivable number.....

WOW this is amazing! Maybe England can now afford to pay all the wasters on benefits there full due without any cuts!

Spread the word immigration to England is still so worth it! You can be a total waster but we wont mind, the Brits just love multiculturalism you know ;-)

On another note the Vatican could have an interest to investing in England to promote the Christian religion i.e. the war against the spread of Islam to the west. If England falls to Islam then all the western white nations have had it.

reply to post by thoughtsfull

I hasten to add that it is no good getting the police in, because i will immediately call the Bank of England as my defence witness, given that it put me in to deal with this problems.

If Lord James was employed by MI5, he would have signed the official secrets act. He would certainly mention the fact, instead of calling the Bank of England my defence witness.
So i believe he was used in a purely private capacity.

When i read the op, my first thought was, is this an offer from a private/chartiable foundation

Singley all foundations would not have enough funds for this.But together they do have.

Link to a list of foundations HERE


I can't honestly believe that this is being done by a philantropist,who just wants to improve this country.
Who/whatever is doing this is certainly going to collect on thier investment.

Originally posted by invetro
This is incredible if true. Incredible and disturbing. No one would buy a country out of debt for nothing in return. Maybe it is in return for strategic positioning inside our waters or an economic ruse.
If it IS the Vatican I would imagine they would want to reinstate religion on a bigger footing here. They would see a return that way over the years and it would be financially viable in the long term. The whole schools and hospitals thing would be to sucker people into believing the donor is benevolent in their intentions, whoever they are.

In effect, no matter who it is, we would be expected to be "grateful" I'll bet, at our benefactors beck and call.

The last open attempt to buy out a country's national debt, is when the Medellin and Cali Cocaine Cartels approached Manuel Noregia in 1984 to float an offer by them in exchange for paying off Columbia's 3 Billion Dollar Foreign Debt if the Columbian President made a law prohibiting extradition of Drug Lords to the United States.

The Columbian President turned down the offer.

Good one! They have semi trailers stuffed full of money just waiting to be washed clean...
The profered sums seem to rule out most individuals.....where is money trying to escape from to find its way to englands shore?or shore up england?
Perhaps some group trying to launder their 9/11 profits?
A group of corporations trying to perpetuaate the war on terror etc for another round of the next generation of weapons including mind control electronics?
Perhaps they need the british troops somewhere......?

this has got to be one of the most amazing speeches ive ever heard..this HAS to make headlines across the world...not about the foundation X..but his admissions that he has handled (washed) billions of pounds of terrorists money...with the full knowledge and guidance of the bank of england.

maybe if you changed the title to include the bank of england laundering terrorists money this could be a huge thread...

Originally posted by HEREFORD 1969
reply to post by thoughtsfull

 

I hasten to add that it is no good getting the police in, because i will immediately call the Bank of England as my defence witness, given that it put me in to deal with this problems.

If Lord James was employed by MI5, he would have signed the official secrets act. He would certainly mention the fact, instead of calling the Bank of England my defence witness.
So i believe he was used in a purely private capacity.

edit on 3-11-2010 by HEREFORD 1969 because: one day i will learn to use this damned keyboard

Thanks for picking me up on that I suspect you are right..

Still a very incredible notion, that there is X foundation and X foundation is placing it's money is a number of nations to reboot the global economy (UK it seems the first injection is £22bn) multiply that by the number of nations involved.. it could be an incredible amount.. however for me the whole line of it being to reboot the global economy falls down when they talk of building hospitals, schools and making Crossrail prettier.

There is a fantastic aricle on Foundation X on a blog called Hopi Sen that attempts to offer a well rounded theory.

Is “Foundation X” the “United Nations Office of International Treasury Control” a body which claims to be a “Sovereign Entity” formed after the end of the Second World War?

The similarities between “Foundation X” and “UNOITC” are notable.

“Foundation X” has Gold Bullion, and wants to invest in billions in economic reconstruction. So does the UNOITC. Additionally, there is mention of the gold standard in both accounts.

“Foundation X” is secretive and only wishes to discuss their proposals with extremely powerful people. The UNOITC has a similar sense of propriety, as can be seen by their unhappiness with the response they got from the Scottish Government when they offered help there.

Worth a read.

This is not quite hitting mainstream yet but the Guardian have made a comment here.

I hope this isn't irrelevant to the discussion, but I noticed that it is suggested the money could be used for schools and hospitals among other things.

Also in the news recently is the idea of compulsory MMR vaccinations for children. No vaccination - no school. As it was reported, there doesn't appear that there's too much chance of it happening, but even so...

I've read some concerns on this thread about the population having a price to pay for this sort of 'help' and wonder if those helping to finance the schools might be in a position to insist on the kids being vaccinated.

www.guardian.co.uk...

Anyway, I might be very wide of the mark, but as an exercise in dot-joining the idea might have some value.

reply to post by george_gaz



I agree on the similarities, but there are also disparities.. the investment in Hospitals, Schools and Crossrail are not items I would consider of economic importance, or would generate sufficient growth to impact the UK economy let alone the world economy..

Another aspect would be Foundation x saying they do not wish to control how the money is spent or managed, leaving all aspects down to the British Gov, where as the OITC has it's own teams, and specialism in helping to manage the finances it gives.

And many of the objectives of the OITC includes wording like "assist" "work conjointly" and from what is said in the Hansard I don't get the impression that it is the OITC.

Edit to add.

Someone like the OITC and their failed bid to acquire MG makes sense given their objectives.. so if the offer had been to make an investment to revitalise certain sectors of British industry I would buy that this would be an org like the OITC, but the hands off, altruism seems a bit to much.. and seems more like an org like the Vatican (that needs to improve it's PR) tho i don't think it is the Vatican.

Originally posted by thoughtsfull
reply to post by george_gaz

 

I agree on the similarities, but there are also disparities.. the investment in Hospitals, Schools and Crossrail are not items I would consider of economic importance, or would generate sufficient growth to impact the UK economy let alone the world economy..

y]

The cuts threaten the very foundations of this country, of course School's Hospitals and Crossrail are of economic importance. You have to think more long term here. A better educated population a healthier population, with better transport communications is good for the economy. Also it creates a lot of jobs.

whether foundation x have such benevolent intentions remains to be seen.

Originally posted by george_gaz

“Foundation X” has Gold Bullion, and wants to invest in billions in economic reconstruction. So does the UNOITC. Additionally, there is mention of the gold standard in both accounts.

I can't help but think that I wouldn't be too very interested in gold bullion...bars, anyway...right now unless I had a bandsaw on hand.

Originally posted by woodwardjnr

Originally posted by thoughtsfull
reply to post by george_gaz

 

I agree on the similarities, but there are also disparities.. the investment in Hospitals, Schools and Crossrail are not items I would consider of economic importance, or would generate sufficient growth to impact the UK economy let alone the world economy..

y]

The cuts threaten the very foundations of this country, of course School's Hospitals and Crossrail are of economic importance. You have to think more long term here. A better educated population a healthier population, with better transport communications is good for the economy. Also it creates a lot of jobs.

whether foundation x have such benevolent intentions remains to be seen.

How often do you hear people saying they've been working hard to buy their hospital a scanner only to find out that the hospital had given the scanner to a private company to operate as they did not have the fund to employ the staff to man it or keep it in good working order.

Building schools and hospitals is fine (long term) if you have the funds to use the facilities and maintain them.. which it seems we do not, and £22bn won't go very far in that regard. Besides why would they use such a long term method to stimulate the global economy? and then take a hands off approach allowing the UK gov to simply fritter away those funds. I am sorry to say this, but I don''t feel it would stimulate anything.

IMHO to stimulate the UK economy they would be looking at reinvigorating say, the steel industry of the North or injecting the cash into new green tech, with that type of capital investment we have wealth creation, and with wealth creation we have new jobs and the more tax players we have, we can spread the pain of repaying the debt we are in and build new hospitals, schools, employ teachers, nurses, giving them the tools to do their jobs while being able to maintain the facilities.

What we have here is a cul de sac of investment, a short term feel good factor, a great bit of PR that would only be of short term benefit, which will then come as a blow when they gov says they can't afford to keep them open.

Well that is my take on it

Wow, just the fact that he talks about laundering terrorist money ! Is that legal?

No one has mentioned it yet, so I feel compelled to bring up Benjamin Fulford and his claims about the secret Dragon Societies. I do think that he is mostly a whack a nut job, but he definitely is knowledgeable about international fiscal matters.

Anywho, just thought I would throw that out...

en.wikipedia.org...

in his speech he says they 'foundation x' will only speak to people with security clearance that only 6 people in the world have.