It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

911 was an inside job

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 05:47 PM
link   
Obviously, 911 was an inside job. They may bribe scientists to talk like puppets in a puppet show, but they can't fool everyone of us. The collapse of WTC7 was a controlled demolition. Just looking at the sequence of events is enough to conclude it was one. Even the smaller buildings around the twin towers, all of which suffered substantial damage, still stood unlike WTC7. I don't think I need any more arguments, the way they tried to cover it using cheap tactics and how utterly obvious it was tell me it's useless to even argue against it.
edit on 2-11-2010 by bulgogi because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 05:50 PM
link   
Look. With all due respect to what you believe, this has been covered on multiple occasions by scientists, magazines, and even researchers from this forum. Everything has a logical explanation. I suggest you look for those explanations and debunking before clinging to the generally misinformed conspiracy theories regarding 9/11.



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 05:50 PM
link   
Thank you for sharing what most of us know.. Care to back up your claim? just because you say it is does not mean it is..

I am on your side but you should show what you are talking about because some members on here are a lil......... ahhh......... never mind..

But point is when you say something on this forum you should back it up with what your talking about.. Not that they will read what you put but its the point beiing.

::EDIT::
See what i mean above?
edit on 11/2/2010 by ThichHeaded because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 05:55 PM
link   
reply to post by bulgogi
 


Welcome to ATS. As the posters above me have mentioned , you are not saying anything that hasn't been said here thousands of times already .

It helps to bring something to the table , instead of just claiming 9/11 was an inside job .

For the record , I will be one of your opponents . With that said , good luck and enjoy the time you spend here .
edit on 2-11-2010 by okbmd because: corrections



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 05:56 PM
link   
It amazes me how ignorant people can be. The scientific reports didn't provide any scientific evidence supporting their conclusion. All they could do is offer a possible explanation without examining all the physical evidences they had before them. It was a complete farce.



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:03 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:06 PM
link   
Second the "with all due respect," but please do an ats search on the subject and perhaps contribute your opinion there to one of the gazillion threads(here) instead of starting another one. Perhaps pick a specific issue and go from there. Your heading has become a generic notion(not that I don't agree) and your points have been thoroughly discussed here. Since you are new, I can appreciate your enthusiasm in this issue, but when I saw the title, I thought,"geez, where has this person been, oh, not on ats until a couple of days ago."
Nice smile


Respectfully,
spec

edit on 2-11-2010 by speculativeoptimist because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:11 PM
link   
reply to post by bulgogi
 

Another thread like your other thread on a well know conspiracy with absolutely nothing in support of your statements?
Granted, you did place this in skunk works so technically you don't really need any corroboration but a subject like this needs something at least suggestive of supporting your opinion.

Good luck!...



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:17 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:22 PM
link   
reply to post by bulgogi
 


" 9/11 was an Inside Job "

To be Fair , In order for that statement to have any Believeability at All , the " Burden Of Proof " is on the " Truthers " to Prove it . The same can be said of the Critics of the Warren Commissions Final Report on the JFK Assasination . Until Unrefuted Evidence is Presented to the Public on either Alledged Conspiracy , their respective Final Conclusions must be taken as the Final Word on those Events for now .



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:35 PM
link   
Why don't you start here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are 100 threads covering WTC 7.



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by bulgogi
 


" 9/11 was an Inside Job "

To be Fair , In order for that statement to have any Believeability at All , the " Burden Of Proof " is on the " Truthers " to Prove it . The same can be said of the Critics of the Warren Commissions Final Report on the JFK Assasination . Until Unrefuted Evidence is Presented to the Public on either Alledged Conspiracy , their respective Final Conclusions must be taken as the Final Word on those Events for now .


We're not robots so you can't impose some bogus rule on us and expect we won't completely ignore it. It's amazing people still fall for the cheese. They always fall for it. It seems they always want to take the shortest mental route possible and click on close. The public will believe anything you throw at them. You can say something like "According to our computer model, a gust of air hit the central column and initiated the symmetrical collapse of the building, which did look like a controlled demolition, but wasn't." and the people will take the cheese.

edit on 2-11-2010 by bulgogi because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by bulgogi
911 was an inside job.


And your evidence for that is...... what exactly?


The collapse of WTC7 was a controlled demolition.


So just when did they plane the tonnes of explosives needed to do it, with no one noticing?

What evidence do you have?



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:56 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by dereks
 


Thank You dereks , as a Truther myself , I would NEVER ASSume to make a Statement like that Unless I had Strong Evidence to Back it up . One day though , that Evidence Might Turn Up , but for now , it just dosen't Exist .



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by bulgogi
It's amazing people still fall for the cheese. They always fall for it. It seems they always want to take the shortest mental route possible and click on close.


I haven't seen anyone falling for cheese or clicking on close.
Admittingly cheese sounds good and clicking close sounds like a good option here honestly.
Even though it's already been done numerous times previously what about some how and why you've formed your opinions. That's some of what people are looking for instead of just stating your opinions.

Actually, maybe it's just better if I go eat some cheese and click on the close button for this thread.


See ya...



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by bulgogi
I don't need any proof because it's obvious who it was.


So you have zero evidence, and zero proof.

Just like all truthers!



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:03 PM
link   
nice post, it was an inside job



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:19 PM
link   
reply to post by bulgogi
 



When you see a dead frog with a gaping mouth full of ...


Seeing that you are new here , a friendly word of advice . This type of language is not tolerated in the ATS community . A moderator will probably be along to censor your post before long .



posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 07:22 PM
link   



find that at the top right hand side, as there are trillions of threads about this very subject which are much more well put together than your half paragraph opening post, feel free to add you insight to any of those threads I'm sure you could just type 911 in there.


Enjoy!



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join