posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 09:46 AM
reply to post by thoughtsfull
I see what you are saying , and I cant help but agree with your assessment of the situation, with regard to your comments suggesting that either an
external or internal conflict is on the cards. I also agree that idealy, if an internal conflict were to occur, that it would be prefferable if it
were as bloodless as possible.
We have also accord on the assumption that the government would not allow that to happen. It is my belief that if they begin an even more disasterous
and violent foreign policy , and the people of our nation stand against it in any meaningful and effective manner, then the government will likely as
not be as inflamatory and un democratic about dealing with the unrest of its population as you can imagine. For instance, when legitimate anti war
marches are held, and millions line the streets, you can bet the riot act will be read to them, and protestors will be blamed for any violence which
arises from the situation. Arrests will be made of legitimate persons within that movement, and all public outcry against those injustices will either
be unheeded, or the matter will be tied up in litigation and legalese for a ridiculous period of say ten years, so that the whole thing blows over, or
at least so any effective movement of peaceful protest is left headless.
This will reduce the scale of protests, and possibly reduce the numbers of persons willing to actualy DO anything about it, to a hard core of
increasingly put upon moralists. Effectively they will be forced by the government to either put up with the situation, and the ruination of the name
of Great Britain, or spill blood to save its collective soul. They will create monsters of good men, to hide thier sin, and the shame which
accompanies it.