Man walked on the moon... NOT.

It is more than obvious that one of these are fake and that camera lenses could not have produced these differences in outer space. No matter how you turn the frame, all you will see is a gigantic pimple NASA couldn't conceal despite all the cosmetic they've applied onto it. They say we have all these moon rocks and the laser reflector, but they don't really prove anything. Neither of them imply necessarily that the astro-nots walked on the moon.

A little less weird rant and a bit more cohesive statement would be awesome..
Otherwise: Bad troll: no cookie.

Originally posted by bulgogi
but they don't really prove anything.

And neither do your pictures or the approach you're taking to try and prove it.

So, where do you suppose the spaceships went?

We can see the lunar landing sites with powerful telescopes from earth, so we know for sure that humans have sent something there. We also watched the guys get in the spaceship and take off, heading in that direction. . .


We obviously have spaceships that we can watch go into space. Doesn't it seem like they could head towards the moon pretty easily?

Does faking the whole thing seem plausible? Isn't it far more likely that you just don't know what you're talking about?

erm... how about something new to add to this topic? interesting insight, creative theory, some new angle not covered yet? otherwise, the ATS "search" engine is your friend...

reply to post by OnceReturned


From earth? I doubt it. Source? I hope it's not CNN.

reply to post by bulgogi


Is there a discussion going on here or just a bunch of one-liners that seek to argue and antagonize?
Just trying to figure out which way you want this to go..

As for sources, where's yours? un-sourced pictures and un-substantiated rants don't get far on ATS.

reply to post by bulgogi


Since the moon landings occurred between July 21, 1969 and December 14, 1972, and CNN wasn't extant until 1980, I doubt that any moon landing footage could be credited to CNN.

~Heff

I doubt the U.S. would have sent men to the moon. It's simply stupid. The only purpose of Apollo was to improve the U.S. missile capabilities and to make the American public swallow the big military spending associated with it. If they were to lose a man, it would have backfired and the public would have opposed further military spending, which was cleverly disguised as a civilian program spending.

reply to post by bulgogi


You honestly think that photographic evidence has anything to do with whether or not we went to the moon? And that the brightness of the sun in certain photos somehow shows we didn't go there? How would that prove we never went? Even if the photos were proven to have been taken on a studio and not the moon it would only be evidence of faked photos NOT of a faked moon landing. Plus we've landed on the moon several times (something most moon hoax proponents forget) and brought back plenty of lunar samples to go along with the photos, video, massive rocket launches witnessed by hundreds in person and thousands or even millions at home.

I also suppose that you are right and nearly every scientist and professional astronomer on the planet is wrong

reply to post by bulgogi


Pictures can be altered. Experience is the only proof for all people. You have commented on an interesting subject. Keep up the observations.

reply to post by bulgogi



ah - at last a definitive claim

please tell us exactly WHAT aprst of the appollo programe " contributed to missile programs " ? if anything missile programs were the foundations of apollo - not the otherwaty round

and also - your " proof " ignores apollo 1 - not one , but threee men died - buy your metric that should have shut down the appollo program

reply to post by Archangelelijah


I concede... Photos can be faked - though through analysis the probability of this can be reduced to almost nil. But faking a retro reflector should be conclusive proof that there is, at least, man made technology on the moon.



~Heff

Originally posted by OnceReturned

We can see the lunar landing sites with powerful telescopes from earth, so we know for sure that humans have sent something there.

You can see the moon form earth, yes.

But you cannot get a picture of the landers from Anyone but NASA.

So that whole "soviets would have blown the whistle" theory is bunk.

Provide me with a soviet picture of the landing sites that shows the landers.

Originally posted by Exuberant1

Originally posted by OnceReturned

We can see the lunar landing sites with powerful telescopes from earth, so we know for sure that humans have sent something there.

You can see the moon form earth, yes.

But you cannot get a picture of the landers from Anyone but NASA.

So that whole "soviets would have blown the whistle" theory is bunk.

Provide me with a soviet picture of the landing sites that shows the landers.

Why is the Soviet theory bunk? The Apollo program took place at the height of the cold war. The Soviets watched every move our space program made. They could track the Apollo capsules heading to the Moon and if it was not true they would have told the entire planet. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

reply to post by A TRUE AMERICAN


So you cannot provide Soviet images of the Apollo landers?

Why not?

reply to post by Exuberant1

If the thousands of images available from NASA are not sufficient for you, then why on Earth (pun) would some images from the at-that-time Soviet Regime? Are you saying that images from the former Soviet Union are acceptable to you, whereas images from a US agency are not?

If that is so, could you explain your reasoning? If it's not so, then why are you asking someone to provide them?

By the way, OP, if you're going to post images it would be most helpful if you could provide us with their source, and preferably a link to that source so that we can check it and also find out in what context these images were placed on the source site. We can also check that what you've posted has not been altered in some way from the source images.

In addition, seeing as you're new here, it's only fair to be sure that you know about the site's terms and conditions (T&C's) in respect of posting such material. The complete T&C's can be found here, but I'd like to especially draw you attention to sect 15, part of which reads:

15c.) Intellectual Property: You will not Post any copyrighted material owned by others, material belonging to another person, material previously Posted by you on another website, or link to any copyrighted material without providing proper attribution*, as defined by TAN, to its original source.

"TAN" is The Above Network, which is the organization that owns and operates ATS and its affiliated sites.

If your pictures are not copyright, then you should at least tell us where they come from so that we can confirm their source, and also confirm that they aren't copyright.

Also, I can't figure what the "pimple" is that you allege these images apparently show, so perhaps you could elaborate on that as well.

Thanks.

Personally i think op is wrong, i think man went to the moon, but the technology used was far more advanced. Its the higher techs that they are hiding, and man went there before 69.