It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I Have confirmed ATS management hides threads if they want to.

page: 5
36
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 12:13 PM
link   
Since this thread is off-topic anyway...





Someone give me my 700th star.


EDIT: YES! I'VE ACCOMPLISHED SO MUCH!


edit on 10/30/2010 by PETROLCOIN because: I have accomplished so much!



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 12:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by PETROLCOIN
Since this thread is off-topic anyway...


ATS is a conspiracy site. That makes us paranoid to some extent. Some more than others, myself included. If someone doesn't know how the site works it's easy to see threads like this popping up. Let's cut the OP some slack. This thread probably showed him that his concern is unwarranted. Yeah these can become tedious but hey, have you got anything better to do today?



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 01:01 PM
link   
reply to post by ATS4dummies
 


id agree with that they took off the agency message and a message from a woman claiming to be the person in the charlie chaplin film with a mobile phone, your right they are probably part of the agenda and are another way to stop this truth embargo coming out



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 01:03 PM
link   
reply to post by ATS4dummies
 


This is a classic case of someone who thinks they understand what they are seeing when, in fact, they do not.

The thread in question (as has been pointed out already) was "trashed", put in a forum only staff can see called, wait for it... "the trash bin".

The reason it was put there has been explained already too, it turned into a free advertisement for a known hoaxer, charlatan and all around intemperate jerk.

We don't do that here (the free advertising for jerks that is
) any more than we would do something as utterly ridiculous as "trash" a thread but leave it visible to the OP.

What, exactly, would be the point behind that? To fool the OP into thinking his thread wasn't trashed? You honestly think we are that childish? Well, that theory won't hold water either, because, EVERY action taken by staff on EVERY thread generates an automated U2U to the OP that informs them of the action taken.

Seriously, this is a case of ignorance causing paranoid assumptions that lead to rather insulting and false accusations.


Finally, I keep seeing the words "The ATS Agenda" in threads like this (and elsewhere). Anyone who can possibly extract an "Agenda" out of User Generated Content has a masterful sense of agenda gathering!


Springer...



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 01:14 PM
link   
^^^^^^^ what he said.

OP = annihilated



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 01:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Springer
Anyone who can possibly extract an "Agenda" out of User Generated Content has a masterful sense of agenda gathering!


user GENerAteD content

I tried. I only came up with AGEND. There needs to be one more "a" in User Generated Content to extract an "Agenda" from it.

Can this be done? Can you guys add one more "a" to User Generated Content so that we can make 40,000 more threads about the Agenda in User Generated Content? If you can, please place that atop the Agenda. It is of utmost importance.

Thank you.

Signed,
A Pointless and Sarcastic Content Generating User



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 01:55 PM
link   
reply to post by PETROLCOIN
 


What if you used the phrase "out of A user generated content" blah blah blah ...


Just trying to help you out.

--Another user generating content



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 02:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 


Ah yes, good sir. We have cracked the code.

Nice try, ATS. But you can't fool us.

I bet ATS really stands for Agenda Towards Subversion.

We've got it all figured out. We found out just how far the rabbit hole goes...

It's about 4 inches. He got stuck. Too fat.

But YOU already knew that, ATS. DIDN'T YOU?!

Satanists.



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 02:35 PM
link   
reply to post by briantaylor
 


Well, some people saw your post and starred and flagged it, so it was seen. In fact, I remember seeing it myself. After reading the first page, I decided not to continue. Perhaps others did too.

You seem to be making an assumption that because you didn't get many replies, ATS must somehow have hidden it. That is merely speculation. There is another possible reason - perhaps the lack of responses is in itself genuine feedback - as it was in my case. I acknowledge that would not be the kind of feedback you wanted, but it is very possible that it is, nevertheless, real feedback.

It's true that your thread doesn't come up in the search facility, but that is not something I find unusual. I think the ATS search facility is pretty useless. I have found it very ineffecient and frustrating to use, so much so that I don't bother using it any more. But again, you make assumptions about why your thread doesn't appear in the search facility result - and based on my experience of having tried, unsuccessully, to use it many times, I have to disagree with your assumption/hypothesis that it somehow confirms that ATS is 'hiding' your thread.

I wish you well with your book, but, honest feedback - I won't be reading it.


edit on 30-10-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 02:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by gatorboi117
Do you have proof of this?

I will say this though: I used to work as a "super moderator" on a large survival forum. On said forum, we would block posts that went against the "agenda" of the site, meaning: if the thread started was not to serve the purpose of our site (to spread survival awareness, discuss how to survive certain things, ect.) then we would simply delete the thread, close it, or hide it.
So, ATS Staff may do the same thing if they feel a thread is detremental to the site, or is just pointless. Remember, this is their board, and you have payed nothing to use it. We have the privalage to post here, not a right. They can do as they please.



One of my thread titled "Dec 2008: Freemasons in Singapore celebrate 150 years of existence in region" has zero reply and view.

How many us know that Singapore is home to Freemason Grandmaster of the East?



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by ATS4dummies
If one makes a thread which is in opposition to whatever the agenda is, here at this forum, It can be altered to be visible to the Author, but made completely invisible to anyone else with a different IP domain.

I just thought you folks would like to know that. (Before this one is shot down also.)
THe fact is they *can't* handle the truth, not even at this site.


rut roh;

did someone get put on global ignore?



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Little One
 

SILO: As a member - this too is my site. The admin here do NOT question my loyalty. The fact that you expect me to even respond to YOURE questioning it... I wouldnt waste my time with you to prove anything.

I never questioned your loyalty so take a chill, lol.

I will add I do find it interesting you require proof from others, but, you wouldn’t ‘waste your time’ to prove anything to others yourself. Yes, that is mighty interesting.

Anyway, my question was in asking you if you in fact felt you were being loyal to ATS by attacking others.
That’s called pack mentality.
If it works for you, then have at it. It does not work for me.


I would like to point out however, youre fighting for someone that ran like hell when an admin asked for evidence.

I’d like to point out right back at ya that I'm not ‘fighting’ for anyone. I’m pointing out there’s no need to go all atomic on a newer member who might not be familiar with all the ins and outs of ATS and the fact that glitches, do happen - even here.


Because youre too busy questioning me. Youre a joke and probably the OP themselves for no one else would be dumb enough to have taken youre stance on this. Thats not being mean - THATS BEING HONEST.


No, that’s not being honest - it‘s called voicing your opinion. And just like I’ll not attack the OP for their opinion, I’ll not attack you for yours, as misguided and rude as I may find it.


Regardless if the OP comes back with fact, or a thumb in the face to everyone here, you should be (I stress should be) pleased with the fact that ATS does allow people to question authority, and, if they have big enough shoulders to take it, you should try to follow their example.

Peace


Who are you to reprimand me - question me - bully me when not speaking to ANYONE ELSE in this matter - to judge me?

Sit your a** down.

You must have a fever. Pick on someone your own size - I'll bite back.
edit on 30-10-2010 by Little One because: WILL BITE OUT OF SELF-PRESERVATION



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 04:12 PM
link   
OH NOOEESS the conspiracy site is a conspiracy what will i do now !!! maybe i will just get all my conspiracy reading off of cnn.com or maybe msnbc.

in all fairness i think it was already discussed that the post was omitted due to hoax so yeah... this is now a dead subject i think .. ATS PWNS



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 04:25 PM
link   
Proof of what? Lets see it. And they would also ban you along with such unwanted info. There are other places to post it. Make a YouTube video for all to see perhaps that would stop ATS from hiding it.


refer to this posting please.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 10/30/2010 by Connman because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 04:33 PM
link   
I've always thought it was ATS policy to censor classified information if outside government forces requested it... Or at least I read somewhere that this isn't uncommon practice anyways.

I'm not saying this is the case in the OP, but I doubt ATS allows just anything unless it wants to be forced to shut down by that guy with the gun over there telling us to be where



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   
A while ago I noticed threads vanishing on here.
My goodness I thought to myself, something's amiss.
Undecided on what course of action to take I made my mind up to watch carefully.
Now I have to admit that there was no conspiracy on here, everything's fine.

Right, I'm off now, thanks for reading, and remember...
ATS has no hidden agenda.



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
I've always thought it was ATS policy to censor classified information if outside government forces requested it... Or at least I read somewhere that this isn't uncommon practice anyways.


OK, let's find out then.
Here ya go:
LINK to Above Top Secret Programs, Names, Functions and Locations.
Let's see what happens now.
Have fun folks.
edit on 30-10-2010 by ATS4dummies because: typo



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 04:49 PM
link   
reply to post by ATS4dummies
 


Sorry dude, I don't know how that link in any way relates to your topic. You might want to quit while you're behind.



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 04:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by ATS4dummies

OK, let's find out then.
Here ya go:
LINK to Above Top Secret Programs, Names, Functions and Locations.
Let's see what happens now.


Oh dear ... www.abovetopsecret.com...

That was a very well hidden thread.


Hiding stuff behind the ATS search feature agenda ... they're sneaky those ATS admins.



edit on 30 Oct 2010 by schrodingers dog because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2010 @ 05:05 PM
link   
I seriously wish this were true. I hope it is true and Ive got some 'friends' at ATS 'hiding' some of the insane drivel that Ive posted here because my brain to mouth valve wouldnt turn off. If something like this were true, Id imagine it would be out of either kindness (due to the stupidity of a poster) or to protect national security or something.(like a possible terrorist threat or an ongoing investigation of a member) Slow down and THINK friend. Think where you are and decipher YOUR reasons for being here, then ask yourself.."Do I REALLY have anything to be concerned about?" If the answer is no , then stick around and play with some brains. If the answer is yes, still stick around and play with some brains.



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join