It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whaaa
reply to post by boondock-saint
Even if you have bullion or coins and you need to liquidate some of it....who's going to buy it?
Real gold will be fools gold as well.
I bought into the precious metals hype and now with 1300 gold and 23.00 silver spot.....no one is buying!!
edit on 27-10-2010 by whaaa because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by St Udio
the insider 'selling' is just a function of the HFT programs...
heck, they got multi thousands or even millions of option shares in their back pockets...
don't you believe for an instant that the metrics are telling the public there is a mass
unloading -never to return again- selloff by the insider elites....
sheeze
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by St Udio
the insider 'selling' is just a function of the HFT programs...
heck, they got multi thousands or even millions of option shares in their back pockets...
don't you believe for an instant that the metrics are telling the public there is a mass
unloading -never to return again- selloff by the insider elites....
sheeze
Quite often there is a lot of insider stock buying prior to a stock rising in price. When the opposite happens, ie lots of insider selling, it would tend to indicate the stock is going to drop in value. Those who should have the best grasp of how their stock is performing (insiders) get out when they know a stock has topped out.
Take a look at Bank of America........ Top Execs are exercising their options and the immediately selling them. Looks like over a Million in options exercised and then sold since September.
www.reuters.com... g?symbol=BAC.N&name=&pn=1&sortDir=&sortBy=
I'm sure the trend will be the same in other companies.
Originally posted by Oldnslo
Originally posted by whaaa
reply to post by boondock-saint
Even if you have bullion or coins and you need to liquidate some of it....who's going to buy it?
Real gold will be fools gold as well.
I bought into the precious metals hype and now with 1300 gold and 23.00 silver spot.....no one is buying!!
edit on 27-10-2010 by whaaa because: (no reason given)
Sell it back to the folks you bought it from. I was in my local shop and the place was as busy as ever. I made a purchase and while there, a gentleman was selling his slabbed $20 gold pieces along with 10 gold eagles. We was quite unhappy about selling them but needed to cash out to help his unemployed kids. He told the counter rep he had purchased his eagles, from the same shop, a few years ago at around $450. With gold over $1300, he wasn't crying in his beer. He got paid in FRN's. Yuk!edit on 27-10-2010 by Oldnslo because: poor sentence structure
...
For 24 straight weeks, retail investors have been pulling tens of billions
of dollars out of U.S. mutual funds and plowing hundreds of billions into
low-yield Treasury bonds.
Why? Because they sense the stock market is hopelessly, deeply corrupt
and by comparison Treasuries are trustworthy. You won't make a lot of
yield in Treasuries, thanks to the Fed's zero-interest rate policy (ZIRP)
which is designed to drive money into risky assets, but then you won't
lose 40% like you did in 2008-09 or 2000-2002 in the stock market.
We can also see how insiders are responding to the knowledge that the well
has been poisoned: they're selling 500 shares for every share they buy.
This unprecedented cascade of insider selling has been noted elsewhere
many times, as has the declining expectations for the "recovery" of U.S. CEOs.
Those who know the most are selling their shares as fast as they legally can,
and are publicly expressing their lack of faith in the tricked-up "recovery."
The U.S. financial markets have been poisoned, with long-term negative
consequences. Only crooks, fraudsters and "marks" (those who still believe
the propaganda about the "recovery" and "stocks are cheap" poison)
will be left in a stock market propped up by the same socialization
of risk which keeps the flimsy facade of a mortgage market from crumbling.
High-frequency trading machines create the illusion of a market,
and State intervention via proxies and other corrupt games provides the
liquidity needed to fund the facsimile of a "rising market" and a "recovery"
in the U.S. economy. But the public isn't buying the fraud any longer;
they finally "get it":
The well has been poisoned and only a fool drinks from a poisoned well.
source of snippet: www.oftwominds.com...
Originally posted by Dance4Life
reply to post by pavil
Care to expand on your comment?
There is nothing nefarious about it.
Because stock options do stimulate risk-seeking behavior, as we know from academic research. Options, as you might know, represent a right to buy shares at a certain price at some fixed point in the future. If you are given the right to buy a share in company X for $100 in January 2010 and by then the share price of X is $120, you will have made 20 bucks. However, if the company's share price by then has dropped to $90, your option is worthless. We then say it is "out-of-the-money"; you're not going to exercise your right to buy at 100 when the market price is merely 90.
In that situation, if the CEO of X has many stock options, it stimulates him to be very risk seeking. For example, if by August 2009 the share price is 90, he will be inclined to engage in risky "win or lose" moves. If the risk pays off and the share price rises well above a 100, the stock options will become worth a lot of money. However, if he loses, and the share price plummets even further, say to 60, no worries; it doesn't matter. The stock options to buy at $100 were worthless anyway; whether the stock trades at 90 or at 60.
And research by for example Professors Gerry Sanders from Rice University and Don Hambrick from the Penn State University showed that these things work. They examined 950 American CEOs, their stock options, and their risk taking behavior. They found that CEOs with many stock options made much bigger bets; for instance, they would do more and larger acquisitions, bigger capital investments, and higher R&D expenditures.
However, they also showed that they weren't always very good bets... The option-loaded CEOs delivered significantly more big losses than big gains. That's because they didn't care much about the losses (their options were worthless anyway); all they were interested in were the potential gains.
Moreover, Professor Xiaomeng Zhang and colleagues, form the American University, examined the relationship between stock options and earnings manipulations; plain illegal behavior. They investigated 365 earnings manipulation cases and showed that CEOs with many "out-of-the-money" options were more likely to misrepresent their company's financial results (and get caught doing it!).