It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by turbofan
Does anyone else see the logical error with Trick? He's equating the timing of smoke with the collapse of the
twin towers, as well as comparing a conventional CD with a non-conventional CD (one that was top down).
I showed him two videos that set off charges and the building doesn't immediately come down...but then he
cries about the timing of the smoke...as if the smoke was the origin of the cutter charge, and not the flash.
Anyway, Trick is clearly out to character bash and claim I have a history of 'seeing things' when I clearly
admitted an error while viewing a video on a small monitor.
Trick, when you can come up with a logical explanation for those simultaneous puffs of smoke maybe we'll talk.
Originally posted by turbofan
Says the guy that can't explain what he sees and dances around the question.
You obviously cannot grasp the fact that the other demos only fell because of a secondary set of explosions
taking out critical support columns.
Why didn't those other CD's fall immediately after the first set of charges went of Trick? I thought they were
supposed to come down right away?
5 seconds, 30 minutes, all day...it wouldn't matter until the tech. set off the next succession of charges.
I'll even call up a demo company and ask them if you want to place a little friendly wager?
Originally posted by Project-Sign
reply to post by TrickoftheShade
I don't see flashes anywhere other than the side of the building.
Here's another video, different angle, different camera. Flashes start around 0:20. See how the smoke eminates from the middle of the building.
Are those flashes 'in camera' too? Strange that such a similar phenomena would be present in two different cameras. And there's many more videos showing WTC flashes on youtube, feel free to have a look.
I understand a lot of people don't want to believe that a country would do this to it's own people to further a certain cause, and therefore some people's minds won't be changed regardless of evidence provided, making all of this rather pointless.edit on 27-10-2010 by Project-Sign because: (no reason given)edit on 27-10-2010 by Project-Sign because: (no reason given)edit on 27-10-2010 by Project-Sign because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wmd_2008
[ THE flashes are not flashes look a bit closer at your video see if you can see why you think they are flashes
watch closely look at the tower see if you see whats causing this effect. You will kick yourself
Originally posted by Project-Sign
reply to post by wmd_2008
Oh they're flashes alright. Right there for everyone to see, apart from the ones that choose not to, apparently.
There's several different videos from several different cameras showing the same thing. In this video, whoever's filming even hurriedly pans down to where the flashes are beginning to go off. Must have been something either loud, or quite bright to grab his/her attention. The claim that the flashes are pieces of debris glinting in the Sun is quite frankly the daftest thing I've ever heard. But hey, it is what it is. Believe what you want. I don't need to convince anyone, I know what happened that day. Enjoy.edit on 30-10-2010 by Project-Sign because: (no reason given)