It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
You can't simply purchase an American passport (at least not legally). But since 1990, foreigners with as little as $500,000 in cash have been able to invest their way to a quick green card, putting them on the path to citizenship. Yes, the U.S. government lets people with cash to jump the line for a green card through the EB-5 program. Of the 10,000 visas in the program, 3,000 are set aside for "targeted employment areas" -- rural areas, or places with an unemployment rate that's 150 percent or more of the national average. For these visas, the threshold is lowered to $500,000.
Originally posted by Hefficide
Forget giving us your tired, your poor, and your huddled masses... Just send us your millionaires, your corporate CEO's, and your trust fund babies. All are welcome here!
~Heff
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
The ONLY people coming in should be those with at least 1 million to their name.
We have no need for poor, uneducated, or people who would otherwise be a drain on society.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Hefficide
Canada too. This has always been the way of things. Yet, I would rather equalize by bringing in refugees and educating their children what our nations equality and values mean and stand for. Every new immigrant that is employed creates 3 new jobs servicing the public, and these stats have been well known for a long long time.
Most who gain access to Canada do find employment.
Ask how much you'd have to be paid to give up American citizenship for you and your family and assume that of a randomly chosen foreign country. Something tells me the bidding would start at a point much higher than $500,000.
Originally posted by Hefficide
This nation was built upon the sweat, labor, and innovation of those poor, uneducated people. The reality is that the rich tend to drain and the poor tend to work. I'd take a hard working person with motivation and dreams, but with no money, any day over a rich person who is simply looking for ways to expand his wealth off of my hard work.
~Heff
Originally posted by Portugoal
reply to post by BigTimeCheater
Maybe you should be kicked out in the meantime... (assuming you don't have a million, like millions of other Americans).
Originally posted by Hefficide
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
The ONLY people coming in should be those with at least 1 million to their name.
We have no need for poor, uneducated, or people who would otherwise be a drain on society.
This nation was built upon the sweat, labor, and innovation of those poor, uneducated people. The reality is that the rich tend to drain and the poor tend to work. I'd take a hard working person with motivation and dreams, but with no money, any day over a rich person who is simply looking for ways to expand his wealth off of my hard work.
~Heff
Originally posted by BigTimeCheater
Who do you think employs those "poor people who work"?
Hint: The "rich".
Small firms:
• Represent 99.7 percent of all employer firms.
• Employ half of all private sector employees.
• Pay 44 percent of total U.S. private payroll.
• Generated 65 percent of net new jobs over the past 17 years.
• Create more than half of the nonfarm private GDP.
• Hire 43 percent of high tech workers ( scientists, engineers, computer programmers, and others).
• Are 52 percent home-based and 2 percent franchises.
• Made up 97.5 percent of all identified exporters and produced 31 percent of export value in FY 2008.
• Produce 13 times more patents per employee than large patenting firms.
Small firms accounted for 65 percent (or 9.8 million) of the 15 million net new jobs created between 1993 and 2009.
Much of the job growth is from fast-growing high-impact firms, which represents about 5-6 percent of all firms and are on average 25 years old.
Middle-class Americans--not the poor or the rich--pay the majority of annual tax revenues taken in by the federal government, according to data in a new Congressional Budget Office study. Households earning less than $34,300 per year, meanwhile, actually pay a negative average federal income tax rate.
Middle-class households that earned between $34,300 and $141,900 paid 50.5 percent of all federal tax revenues in 2007 (the most recent year analyzed), according to the CBO study released Thursday, and households that earned between $34,300 and $352,900 paid 66.7 percent of all federal taxes.