It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
Here is the 'London Landing' footage inverted, and with some other effects...
Originally posted by free_spirit
I'm sorry for spoiling the party but all of you are wrong. See here.
The 1995 Dusseldorf Germany RC UFO Model at exhibition.
This footage was actually taken in Dusseldorf, Germany on October 20, 1995 by an
anonymous source from a building balcony. This was an exhibition on a parking lot
and the first object is a lighted RC UFO model doing maneuvers and then landing in
the parking lot. Then a chinese lantern is released as you can see going up slowly
and later getting close to the Dusseldorf Tower and passing behind.
A second chinese lantern also released is seen after approaching the tower in a more
close up view. This is an old footage that fooled many people in the 90's as the real
thing but german researchers exposed the truth of the event. The guy in the video
clearly doesn't know what he is talking about claiming this was taken in England
exposing his ignorance on this event.
Here is a copy with selected images of the original 9 minutes long footage (copy that
I have) showing the action. (Sorry for the quality of the old VHS tape.)
Here is the Dusseldorf Tower for reference. So now you know.
Originally posted by free_spirit
The Dusseldorf 1995 Footage Long Version.
This is a longer version of the Dusseldorf, Germany October 20, 1995 footage in
discussion.
Important Notes: All the cuts/edits were made by the original videographer.
There are 6 cuts in the footage. Seg. 7 - Seg. 12 - Seg. 39 - Min. 1:26 - Min. 3:01
and Min. 5:10 There is no original audio.
DIRECT LINK
media.abovetopsecret.com...
According to the original report the videographer (anonymous) was recording on a
balcony of a department or office.
At certain time (Min. 3:01) the hot air probe dissapeared from view by the balcony ceiling frame.
There is a cut in the video at seg. 12 and when resumed the time is different, more
dark as shown in these two frames.
The secong object released was a hot air probe kind of chinese lantern. It's
movements, speed and behavior is consistent with those artifacts.
Conclusion. No UFOs here, just a RC UFO model (stationed on the parking lot at
seg. 13) and hot air probes - lanterns on an exhibition. There is a flash or strobe
light between the stationed RC model and the first lantern, signaling the area of
release. At min. 1:11 cars going on the right line of the road are seen as well as
cars coming on the left line, this to clarify some doubts.
If somebody still wants to belive these are real UFOs despite the information provided
well, be my guest.
Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
You gonna tell me Santa Claus doesn't exist either!?
MMN says 'Chinese lanterns' hmmm
Originally posted by TheWorldReallyIsThatBorin
It really is tiresome having to explain prosaic phenomena over and over again. Here goes anyway. Turn down the sound and try this for a narrative
The actual police helicopter is not in the video, only its spotlight.
It pans across the elevated highway to the darkened area. The most likely reason being to check out something that is going on in "the car park" [to use the same description as the narrator, however I don't know if it is a car park.]
At that point in the video above there is an edit, but the next thing we see is a vehicle illuminated by the spotlight switches on its headlights and drives off toward the elevated highway.
Then there is another edit and we are told (we do not see) that the "probe" travels over the highway. In fact all we see is the light move a small part of the way across the the line of the highway with vehicle tail lights appearing to pass behind it and in front of it. It is probably an illusion due to the extreme incline of the camera angle. We never actually see a continuous shot of the "probe" pass completely from one side of the highway to the other. So we are probably looking under the elevated highway.
There is another explanation for the third shot of the "probe slowly moving away" apparently over the highway. And here it is:
The camera is looking north west at the northern approaches to the Dartford Crossing. There is an elevated railway that passes over the north bound lanes (which go under the river via a tunnel) and under the south bound lanes (which go over the QEII Bridge.) Train lines do not have lighting like highways so we cannot see the elevated track.
The "probe" is a train moving away from the camera. If you look carefully it looks like some kind of headlight.
In fact in the last few seconds of the video you can see the tail lights of the car that passes under the elevated rail line disappear to the left and reappear on the right of the "probe", as the car goes under the rail line, and the train travelling there on.
Interestingly there also appears to be a lot of waste ground in the immediate vicinity where late night vehicle movements would attract the attention of police.
I can't post an image, but try these google earth coords:
51°28'26.56"N 0°15'57.22"E
Originally posted by free_spirit It would be a good idea to make a profound serach in the ATS
archive before posting a subject to avoid duplicates or disinformation. Have a nice day.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by zorgon
Zorgon.....
MMN says 'Chinese lanterns' hmmm
I found the initial video quite confusing when I first saw it some time back.
However, I think Free Spirits explanation covers it off quite well.
Originally posted by RUSSO
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by zorgon
Zorgon.....
MMN says 'Chinese lanterns' hmmm
I found the initial video quite confusing when I first saw it some time back.
However, I think Free Spirits explanation covers it off quite well.
Tried cover, but not so well. For example, when he said that was a cut and said this because the light difference, i have to say that the angle is different so the compensation of the camera create the illusion that the land is more dark, wich is not.
So he tried explain, but he cant explain this as a chinese lantern. This is ridiculous.
It is a genuine footage.
Thanks again Zorgon.
can you explain
Originally posted by RUSSO
reply to post by free_spirit
can you explain
Can you?
Not what you think that are, a ballon, or CL. This is just your assumption. And your guess is not better than mine.
And yes, it IS a ufo.