It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by benoni
If you see nothing sinister in the mysterious inclusion of nanothermites in the rubble and dust particles then why are you even bothering to argue the issue...its a non-issue surely???
Originally posted by airspoon
Sure, that's how planned and transparent demos work but did WTC1 and WTC2 look like conventional demos? Of course not and thus conventional demos weren't used, that I'm certain of. If demolitions other than the aircraft were used, I think it's safe to say that conventional demolition materials weren't used, therefore if we consider ulterior demolition materials, we have to consider materials that probably aren't used on normal demolitions.
Now, most of this advanced engineered nano-thermitic materials is being researched for the military (or government) and so logically, it wouldn't really be available for the handful of demo companies. However, elements inside government, such as intelligence agencies would have access to it. Regardless, the nano-thermitic material is being engineered (sometimes inside explosives) for the purposes of destruction.
2. More than 100 first responders reported hearing explosions and seeing flashes of light at the onset of destruction. Light flashes indicate explosive detonations. These witnesses are documented in NYC’s “Oral Histories” by City Fire Commissioner Thomas Von Essen
Originally posted by impressme
Yet, the OS communities call s these people liars. Who is being dishonest here?
3. Multi-ton steel perimeter wall sections were ejected laterally at 60 mph to a distance of 600 ft. That speed and distance indicates that a high-pressure explosion initiated the ejection
Again the OS community denies this fact, actual News videos proves this without any doubt
4. 90,000 tons of concrete and metal decking was pulverized in mid-air, again indicating explosions.
And Again the OS community denies this fact as well they will tell you that your eyes are lying to you. Do not listen to them, they are lying to you.
2. More than 100 first responders reported hearing explosions and seeing flashes of light at the onset of destruction. Light flashes indicate explosive detonations. These witnesses are documented in NYC’s “Oral Histories” by City Fire Commissioner Thomas Von Essen
Originally posted by impressme
Yet, the OS communities call s these people liars. Who is being dishonest here?
You are, I don't know of any 'official story supporter' that calls these people liars. I tend to call the author of the paper rather disingenuous. It's the easiest evidence to dismiss, because anyone who's actually read the paper that makes these claims knows just how tenuous most of these 'explosive' connections are. Many of them are the building collapsing, many others are similes etc.
How would explosives possibly explain this? To properly fracture concrete you have to drill holes every few inches and insert small charges, these charges would not be set off in mid air. This is just meaningless speculation attempting to fit unreliable theories to incorrect facts.
This post carries on, but I haven't the heart to respond to the wilful ignorance shown within.
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
"Does not mean, and should not be construed to mean that there is any interest by the press."
Of course the press has no interest in investigating and reporting what really happened on 9/11? Where have you been for the past 9+ years?
Originally posted by impressme
This goes to “prove” you never researched 911. The author is not quoting from some paper he is giving you the evidence from the oral reports that the FBI buried because they did not want the truth told by these professional whom went on record and told their stories and now you have the audacity to call the author a liar. Having an opinion is one thing, but to call the author “disingenuous” without proven your opinions. The more you distort these facts the deeper you bury yourself and the less credibility you have
All of a sudden we heard this huge explosion, and that's when the tower started coming down. We all started running.
I dissagree, you are just giving your opinions based on your patriotic beliefs on the topic that is not a fact. Do you have the scientific evidence to prove the WTC were not destroyed by demolition? No you don’t.
You are in the “I can’t believe inside job stage”. Eventually you will come around perhaps, when you are the only one left supporting the OS fairytale and no one is listening to you anymore.
“willful ignorance”? Perhaps, you need to take a long look at your beliefs and do some real researching and stop preaching the OS proven lies, either you are for the Truth or are you against the Truth.
The fact is more and more people are waking up to the fact that 911 was an inside job, perhaps you feel supporting the perpetrators in our corrupt government is being patriotic. Supporting treasonous acts makes one just as guilty as the real perpetrators and many of the OS defenders have been showing the scientific evidence repeatedly that proves that our government science of 911 is a fraud. So playing ignorant will not work for any of you anymore.
Originally posted by hmmmbeer
Wow, the speed at which the dis-info army got onto this thread means we're finally getting somewhere. Big clue here fellas - this is gonna be big.
Originally posted by hmmmbeer
Big clue here fellas - this is gonna be big.
No it is not actually - nothing will become of it, there will not be another investigation, the conspiracy theories pushed by the truthers will just get sillier - holographic planes, mini nukes, beam weapons....whilst silly theories like those are being pushed by some in the "truth" movement they will all get lumped as kooks.