Merging lights, Moscow on October 19 2010

reply to post by VenomVile.6


I wish they would train themselves so they could stop posting b.s. ufo videos.

reply to post by cronotrigger30


Don't you ever get tired of posting the same stuff? Calling everyone rude who is just defending themselves?

well if something is going on....

If you cant handle the heat, stay ouda the kitchen
That was well said, I think

Originally posted by ptmckiou
Planes cannot start, stop, start, stop, change direction 180 degrees, reverse, go forward, reverse, stop, start, change direction 90 degrees, stop, start, reverse,.....

This.

Glad to see so many others in this thread know its not AIRPLANES.

Originally posted by 0ne10
reply to post by VenomVile.6

 

I wish they would train themselves so they could stop posting b.s. ufo videos.

reply to post by cronotrigger30

 

Don't you ever get tired of posting the same stuff? Calling everyone rude who is just defending themselves?

edit on 19-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)

Or taking their subject matter out of context when they try to explain something to you?
Or maybe blatantly spamming the same misinfo over and over...
yeah.. something along those lines you should be familiar with.

reply to post by VenomVile.6


Obviously it's you all that can't handle the heat.. Dishing stuff out, but can't eat it.

Anyway... this sighting looks exactly like jets... You can't rule out jets...

People claiming they are doing advanced maneuvers juts don't know anything about the laws of perspective.

That guys channel doesn't look legit he has another video that looks exactly like what the op posted, yet its from a year ago, most likely jets, this guy seems to live right next to where jets are frequent in the area doing aerial type things and or is using computer generated graphics, I wanted to believe this video but doesn't seem legit.

Current

Year ago

reply to post by phiktion


You are right... this guy seems to like to film jets and call them UFO.

Here is another video, same exact place, same direction(i think), different time... but this one you can see the lights on the wing tips.


I think since these "UFO" seem to be always visible to him, I think he lives near a major vector route for aircraft and is filming them calling them "UFO".

would phage please debunk this all ready?

all three of those triangles were right triangles. return of pythagoras??

reply to post by phiktion


Yeah I think this guy is either a hoaxer, or hes been living near an airport under high traffic vector routes for multiple years and still doesn't realize they are aircraft.

reply to post by 0ne10


when there is an obvious lack of explanation of what these lights are
they are ufos
UNIDENTIFYED flying objects
its almost comical they way you think every thing that happens is explainable
i wounder if the thought of the unexplainable scares you and drives you search for ufo stories to debunk as a form of saftey blanket



the lights will continue and they will become more and more visable untill even you wont have anything to say but omg a UFO

these lights are part of a bigger picture
similar behaviour in 3 seperate locations
its obvious that these lights are happening to draw public attension
over airports (ny) cant imagine a better place to get attension for a ufo

there is always an airport or airplanes and people are waking up to the fact that disinfo cant change someones mind when they have seen for them selves something that is not an airplane

seing as you love my gif and its fitting to this thread here it is to compaire to the ops video

i beleve the lights behave in a similar way




more sightings in the next few weeks will show these lights to be more than planes

thank you for the thread good job

xp

It doesn't seem like it would be too hard to take the same images of the triangle light formations and use footage of New York, or Texas, or Moscow and say "look, they are over Russia now." All one needs is some simple video editing software.

Actually, some of these "glowing lights" stuff being put on YouTube could be from anywhere. It's cool-looking, but I'm just saying ...

Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by 0ne10

 

when there is an obvious lack of explanation of what these lights are
they are ufos
UNIDENTIFYED flying objects

Yes, I know the definition of UFO. Thanks.

Originally posted by XPLodER
its almost comical they way you think every thing that happens is explainable

To me it's comical the way you think everything that happens is unexplainable.

Originally posted by XPLodER
i wounder if the thought of the unexplainable scares you and drives you search for ufo stories to debunk as a form of saftey blanket

Nope. That is not it. As a child I was always fascinated with all things that fly. I admired all aircraft, and because of that, my eyes were always in the skies looking at aircraft. Because I was always looking up (for many many years), I have seen a few UFO my self. I believe aliens exist, I believe they could probably reach Earth if they have advanced technology, and I know the government works on secret projects before revealing them to the public, so UFO's have always been an interesting topic to me. My favorite childhood movie is "Flight of the Navigator".

I have seen 3 UFOs I couldn't explain, and I have been searching for more.

I have been a UFO investigator for 20 years or so, and my knowledge of this subject is vast. I get excited every time I see or hear of a new UFO sighting... but then get highly disappointed when I find it's a hoax or mundane. So I have dedicated a lot of my time to destroying hoaxes and hoaxers because over the years I have grown to hate them with a passion.

My UFO detection skills have been refined over these many years.... If I say a particular sighting is explainable, 99.8% of the time it is.

I have identified many confirmed hoaxes over the years, and my record is nearly perfect when it comes to identifying objects.

Originally posted by XPLodER
the lights will continue and they will become more and more visable untill even you wont have anything to say but omg a UFO

Yes, while more and more people are looking into the sky, and more and more people have access to cameras, I agree that there will be more and more "UFOs" showing up on the internet. There will be more and more misidentifications, and more and more hoaxes too.

Ive already seen an "UFO" before.. 3 of them. I can't explain them... I am looking for more and I haven't found them.

Originally posted by XPLodER
these lights are part of a bigger picture
similar behaviour in 3 seperate locations
its obvious that these lights are happening to draw public attension
over airports (ny) cant imagine a better place to get attension for a ufo

there is always an airport or airplanes and people are waking up to the fact that disinfo cant change someones mind when they have seen for them selves something that is not an airplane

I think you are in error when you say all these lights have similar behavior. Just because they all happen to line up as a triangle for a split second of time... doesn't make them similar.

Originally posted by XPLodER
seing as you love my gif and its fitting to this thread here it is to compaire to the ops video

i beleve the lights behave in a similar way

Those lights were already proven to be aircraft. Unless you think "UFOs" are flying over NY almost every single night....

Originally posted by XPLodER
more sightings in the next few weeks will show these lights to be more than planes

You speak as if you know... but you don't.

Originally posted by XPLodER
reply to post by 0ne10

 

when there is an obvious lack of explanation of what these lights are
they are ufos
UNIDENTIFYED flying objects
its almost comical they way you think every thing that happens is explainable
i wounder if the thought of the unexplainable scares you and drives you search for ufo stories to debunk as a form of saftey blanket



the lights will continue and they will become more and more visable untill even you wont have anything to say but omg a UFO

these lights are part of a bigger picture
similar behaviour in 3 seperate locations
its obvious that these lights are happening to draw public attension
over airports (ny) cant imagine a better place to get attension for a ufo

there is always an airport or airplanes and people are waking up to the fact that disinfo cant change someones mind when they have seen for them selves something that is not an airplane

seing as you love my gif and its fitting to this thread here it is to compaire to the ops video

i beleve the lights behave in a similar way




more sightings in the next few weeks will show these lights to be more than planes

thank you for the thread good job

xp

Man, i still trip on how fast that one merging is going for being delayed

all i can say is the oct 19 vid (origanal) that light at top lust sat in the same spot for 12 mins dont you think if it was a plain moveing away or what ever the light would of faided out after 12 mins not get biger and smaller. an the vid on oct 5 was moveing slowly not the same as standing still in the same spot for 12 mins

reply to post by 0ne10

Those lights were already proven to be aircraft. Unless you think "UFOs" are flying over NY almost every single night....

proven by who to whom ?
i have not seen any thing other than conjecture
and as i made it, surely if its proven its proven to the creator as well
please explain how four light sources can combine and all change vector at exactly the same time?
you claim to be interested so answer me this

if three objects of light have exactly the same vector how can all objects of light change directions or vectors and still have exactly the same vector ?

if four objects were perfectly on the same vector and they all moved at EXACTLY the same time they would stay in the same object of light but how is it possable that four objects can have the same EXACT vector for 2 mins then all change flight paths EXACTLY at the same time so that only one light is seen?

Coincident
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Coincident is a geometric term that pertains to the relationship between two vectors. Vectors consist of a "magnitude" and a "direction". Vectors can be said to be coincident when their direction is the same though the magnitude may be different; that is to say, they lie one on top of the other. If two coincident vectors were to be normalized (shortened or lengthened to be one unit long), the resulting vectors would be identical. The dot product of two coincident vectors is the product of their magnitudes. The cross product of two coincident vectors is a vector of all zeros.

Source en.wikipedia.org...

if you understand that four planes have an incredably small percentage chance of a coincident that is as they change directions to the flight path from middle to top right AT EXACTLY the same vector to the camera AND EXACTLY the same height and EXACTLY the same speed you will (if reasonable) understand that two planes would struggle to do it
three would be increadable unlikely and four would be 0.01% chance (coincedence can happen but not very often)

so are you able to explain how four aircraft vetors altered as if they were one?

i have tryed to be logical because i beleive each person is worth at lest one go at a explination

hope this makes sence

xp

reply to post by 0ne10


Do jets hover or stay in place?

second line to say " chuck norris doesn't tea bag, he potato sacks"

reply to post by TasteTheTruth

Hey thats a great observation, nice work!

It's oviously a radio tower that has decided to levitate above the city. Perfectly normal this time of year as the ummm swamp gas from the Leonids meteors have an ummm awkward gravitational pull due to the increased solar ring activity. Everybody knows that.

Nice find, and other cliches.
S&F