Why are independent investigations into 9/11 shunned? But we're expected to take in everything the

"Why are independent investigations into 9/11 shunned? But we're expected to take in everything the 9/11 commission report claims?"

The thread title may not have been the best, because I am also going to give a quick glance into the 9/11 event as a former debunker and how I was slowly transformed into a 'truther' so to speak.

It has taken me about eight years to come around and acknowledge that not all the dots are connecting in the 9/11 commission report....
The first thing that I took note of was that...Henry Kissinger was originally in charge of the 9/11 commission report....For some people that may NOT raise any red flags, but for me it did...esp considering how Henry Kissinger has been involved and literally orchestrated more than a few coup d'etats in South America and in Eastern Asia.

Link

One in particular was the coup d'etat in Chile, pay attention to the date in which the democratically elected Chilean Socialist Party presidential candidate Salvador Allende's term abruptly ended (reported due to suicide, although many Chileans dispute this...) Coincidence? I'm not going to say it isn't...but it sure looks familiar.

en.wikipedia.org...

That, and the fact that the Bush administration and administrations prior to it had sought his consulting throughout their term.

But that is beside the point.....

I understand that it may take some people even longer than myself given that the MSM has become another tool for the interests of a select few, be it corporate interests, political interests, etc...

I will break it down starting with how the general public became informed about the 9/11 attacks:
The Mainstream Media




Prior to the 9/11 commission report there was a lot of confusion in the media...some of the stories from first hand witnesses didn't seem to corroborate with what was later officially reported, but let's assume that they were mistaken due to all the chaos and commotion at the time...So let's move on to the report itself.



And here's the report for your viewing: The official 9/11 Commission report

I must admit that before I decided to look further into the conspiracy theories regarding 9/11 I was skeptical. I was sure that it was a combination of negligence and incompetence of our intelligence agencies and political leaders at the time. I would often mention how ridiculous some of them were, but I decided to narrow it down and look into the ones that appeared most 'plausible'....

In me doing so...I happened (by luck) to stumble upon this independent investigation done -NOT BY OUR GOVERNMENT- or other known federally funded organizations.
It primarily focuses on the Pentagon attack....there's hardly any known footage of it available, unlike the WTC attacks. There's no doubt in my mind that the WTC was hit by two large planes. But, I am not going to go into the WTC because this investigation looks into the Pentagon attack only.

I'm not sure if this has been posted here before, but I'll post it hoping that it gets more views. It doesn't seem to have nearly enough views given all the contradicting information and evidence that they managed to gather throughout their report.



So my question is, whose version do you deem more credible in the end? Despite all the funding and resources available to those behind the 9/11 Commission report...they didn't seem to get it all quite right...in fact they got it damn wrong.

My conclusion is that if it had not been for the technology at the time of 9/11 and the technology of today, we wouldn't even be having this debate. The internet has allowed us as citizens to look carefully at what our government is presenting us with as evidence.

In the end I am left with the words of David Ray Griffin...a credible and recognizable spokesperson in the 9/11 truth movement - and author of "Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory"....

"We refuse to let our knowledge, however limited, be informed by your ignorance, however vast."

It is shunned because it is apparently "offensive" to even consider the possibility of our Government doing harm to it's own people.

Two thumbs up on the Pentagon investigation supported by Pilots for Truth - direct proof that there are inaccuracies in the official story.

BUMP