UN Declares Possible Extinction

Originally posted by ghostsoldier
Its going to come back and bite us though, when the greater-eco system fails, alot of humanities food sources go with it, along with all the little things that make our existence possible that we rarely even think about.

The humble Bee is an obvious example.

Yes, I agree.

Homo sapiens may well die out in the future, and that'll just be the natural evolutionary course, when perhaps some other new species will develop similar traits to us, and take our place at the top of the evolutionary tree.

I've argued before that our supposed intelligence will be our downfall, and I stand by that assertion.

reply to post by Sherlock Holmes


Could also be our savior.

Its not natural to have a self-destroying organism - I haven't seen that replicated in the wider ecosystem, or nothing comes to mind atleast, therefor it would stand to reason that we could overcome this, as that would be the natural thing to do.

The problem being neoliberalist capitalism - growth is needed for it to work, and to admit that the system is wonky requires a lot of hard work to fix, so we've been passing the buck to the next generation.

And if Selfish-Gene-Theory stands correct then its only a matter of time before this fact clicks.

bah, I is waffling off topic.

Originally posted by CHA0S

Originally posted by SeventhSeal

That is just ~!@#$!@# disturbing...

2nd

Sad part is that they do it all the time. I saw this a couple of years ago and wow, just wow.
Save Japan Dolphins

Originally posted by chiponbothshoulders ..........................


But then,one must consider who some may be trying to save it for.

edit on 18-10-2010 by chiponbothshoulders because: other

Yes indeed ! I have no respect for the opinions of the U.N. For whom are they championing their ever so noble cause ???

Well this is the kind of topic that The United Nations should be addressing on a daily basis.
Wouldn't you say.

My point is, that these annual or periodic rabble is ineffective.

This is a TRULY GLOBAL MATTER of EXTREME IMPORTANCE!!!!!!

For ALL forms of life on this planet,,,,,catch my drift?

www.theplasticocean.org...
www.infiniteunknown.net...
www.sciencedaily.com...
www.npr.org...
news.nationalgeographic.com...
www.treehugger.com...
www.earthsendangered.com... Check out the link tabs on their main page

We could go on and on. So many raise their fists and say this places restraints on business.
But we know that is myopically profit driven. Because when a species or resource is gone, its GONE
FOR GOOD. So Where is The Business in That? The Short Termed Greed Heads should be at the TOP
of The Endangered Species List.....Period. In fact, the smart businessman knows this to be true,
and therefore implements this new process insuring The most profitable business model of the future.

Ah yes,
The UN is now pushing even more for Agenda 21.

I am concerned as many are about the rampant pollution, big corporation payouts to avoid culpability, et.al...
However, do we have to abandon our own Declaration of Independence to "correct" our populance?

Sustainable America, the report from our former President Clinton's President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD). Former President Clinton's PCSD is merely one of about 150 similar councils established worldwide governments, following the guidelines from United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development.

Keep in mind that those who define the policy terms will write the rules. These great "sages" will show the "science" to educate the "ignorant masses".

However, nowhere is the usurption of our Rights more evident than in its policies regarding governing private property rights and the use of land and its resources:
Recommendation A.1

(b) All countries should establish as a matter of urgency a national policy on human settlements, embodying the distribution of population...over the national territory.

(c)(v) Such a policy should be devised to facilitate population redistribution to accord with the availability of resources.

Recommendation D.1

(a) Public ownership or effective control of land in the public interest is the single most important means of...achieving a more equitable distribution of the benefits of development whilst assuring that environmental impacts are considered.

(b) Land is a scarce resource whose management should be subject to public surveillance or control in the interest of the nation.

(d) Governments must maintain full jurisdiction and exercise complete sovereignty over such land with a view to freely planning development of human settlements.

The Wildlands project referenced here has an even more vivid description:

"...that at least half of the land area of the 48 conterminous states should be encompassed in core reserves and inner corridor zones (essentially extensions of core reserves) within the next few decades....
Nonetheless, half of a region in wilderness is a reasonable guess of what it will take to restore viable populations of large carnivores and natural disturbance regimes, assuming that most of the other 50 percent is managed intelligently as buffer zones.
Eventually, a wilderness network would dominate a region.... with human habitations being the islands. The native ecosystem and the collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans."


www.un.org...

www.youtube.com...

I'm sorry, but I do not believe that the needs of animals should take dominion over people.

I am not a rabid animal hater for stating this, just a regular American landowner who DOES NOT WANT my rights of owning land taken away.
Period.

This is being sinisterly implemented without people even realizing it...
How hard is it for most people to build even a deck on their own property, without jumping through huge bureaucratic hoops to get the darn permits and permissions??

How many people have had land of theirs already taken away due to "rezoning" laws or conservations easements??

Google Agenda 21. Look at the map they have made up.

This is real.

The UN does not want to conserve. They want to contain people. Contain us drones, sheeple, what have you. Not the elite.
And the human settlements? Will people be happy to live there? Will they be crying out, "Oh, thank you, UN, for saving the whales, the dolphins, and the eagle!! All for this!!"

All of you America haters need to start cleaning up China, Japan and the rest of the third world before you come bashing on the U.S.A.

It is profit and technology that enables environmental friendliness.

Maybe the UN will address the issue of whaling while they are in Japan

Uh, yeah.

Ironic. The biggest destroyer of cetaceans on the planet hosts a biodiversity summit for the UN.

I'm sorry, but I do not believe that the needs of animals should take dominion over people.

I am sorry.. but it is THIS VERY MINDSET of ME FIRST.... that has put mankind in this situation to begin with... pull your head out of your arse and realize about the bigger picture for once. The wanton selfishness of man has done the earth ZERO good. Maybe man could afford this mindset at some point... but we are long past due
You or your land is not more important than an entire ecosystem.

edit on 19-10-2010 by Zeres because: *spelling