It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mike dangerously
reply to post by In nothing we trust
The boogey man is whereever they need him to be especially during an election year.This is how stupid the PTB think we all are we go to "we don't care where he is." to "we know where he is." every election cycle.
Originally posted by Segador
Americans being afraid of Al qaeda is just as absurd as an Elephant being afraid of the mouse.
It's a scare tatic,just like all these vage terror warnings it's funny how all this talk about terrorism comes about at certian times..
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by mike dangerously
reply to post by In nothing we trust
The boogey man is whereever they need him to be especially during an election year.This is how stupid the PTB think we all are we go to "we don't care where he is." to "we know where he is." every election cycle.
So it's all just a marketing gimmick.
edit on 18-10-2010 by In nothing we trust because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mike dangerously
It's a scare tatic,just like all these vage terror warnings it's funny how all this talk about terrorism comes about at certian times..
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by mike dangerously
reply to post by In nothing we trust
The boogey man is whereever they need him to be especially during an election year.This is how stupid the PTB think we all are we go to "we don't care where he is." to "we know where he is." every election cycle.
So it's all just a marketing gimmick.
edit on 18-10-2010 by In nothing we trust because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mike dangerously
Hmm,it must be election time the only time we see any stories on Tim Ossman and Alciada is when one of the so-called parties are worried about remaining in power.edit on 073131p://5126 by mike dangerously because: needed to reedit.
Originally posted by aliengenes
bin ladens dead! been dead for years
Originally posted by Hongkongphooey
Originally posted by aliengenes
bin ladens dead! been dead for years
Whilst I agree with others that TPTB do roll out fake tapes of Osama whenever they want to introduce more fear into their 'brainwashed' societies in the west!
I have one question though, if Osama bin Laden was/is dead where is the proof?
Not much to ask for is it? I mean, when ex-military men, scientists, politicians, radar operators, etc., come out to tell us about UFO's and Aliens, this is the same standard used, isn't it?
So show us the proof!
The Saudi-born militant wanted for the September 11 attacks on the United States nine years ago
Originally posted by Hefficide
This could be a bombshell if true!
Or is it a pretense for a Pakistan invasion?
The Pakistani government are vehemently denying this but it's something that many have suspected for a long time... If not in Pakistan then elsewhere at least... That Osama Bin Laden is alive and well.
Throw into the mix that the article also says that Mullah Omar, the leader of the Taliban is residing in the same region and the implications - whether real or propaganda - are staggering!
So... ATS... Do we think that Pakistan is harboring the most wanted fugitive in the world - or is the American war machine looking for an excuse to expand operations?
~Heff
news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)edit on 10/18/10 by Hefficide because: added content
Originally posted by MrInsideTrack
reply to post by Vicky32
It's quite possible he is dead. Regardless, it is now almost common knowledge that he is not being officially accused of the 9-11 attacks, so how will they be able to convince the American Public to get behind this? Another "nuclear weapons" scare? As the PNAC document written in 2000 suggests, it was always part of the military agenda to conduct multiple theater wars. You can read the document here, if you haven't already:
www.newamericancentury.org... Pakistan is implicated as a nuclear threat in the document. They could use this as a reason. However, the document states there is a case for increasing military spending, since at that point, we were in a fiscal surplus (partly because Clinton cut military spending, and before I start getting attacked for being a Clinton supporter, I am merely stating a fact and not advocating for him.) We are now, more than ten years later, severely in debt. How will they be able to convince the American Public there is enough of a need for this war when we are tapped out financially?