Court says men can beat wife if no marks left

reply to post by gps777


Hi GPS
long time no see
(NJE) here... your link is broken... I would like to read it

cheers

Originally posted by gps777
Sorry guys,I`m having trouble getting the link to the article up.

There`s not much more to the article but anyway.

testing....

www.perthnow.com.au...

edit on 18-10-2010 by gps777 because: (no reason given)

looks like at the end of the url there is a space between the l ] ?

oh read the new link and as soon as I saw it was in Saudi Arabia, I am not surprised. They still publicly execute people there so.... nothing has changed really

reply to post by badw0lf


Funny, you won't tell us what you would do

It is not about handling a drunk lady, it is about me and who I'm which supports my point in regards to the OP, hence there are men who won't strike a women even if the law allows them to do so, and there are men who will strike women even if the law disallows them to do so.

Are you by any chance trying troll

Can I just say this is not unique to the UAE. I had an abusive father, and he genuinely believed it was perfectly fine to beat the # out of me as long as no cuts or bruises were left, mainly due to there being no proof of what he was doing. It happens in the west too.

Originally posted by gps777

Originally posted by badw0lf

I'd be a man and leave it...

cowards however may have other preferences..

I believe men in the west have been programmed to think along the same lines,do anything else and your less of a man.

I`m totally disgusted by UAE's laws which allows this to be legal.

Badwolf you would not be any less of a man if you had to restrain her from striking you and report her.There are those who may see you as less of a man through the same BS programming.

Why is it here in the west,women are given this free riegn to behave this way to men and men allow them.Likewise men in the UAE should not be allowed the same.

I'm fully capable of handling myself, however. I see it as weak, blokes who need to resort to that level.

I can also assure you that a woman can hurt your in very different ways, which can really suck - but even then, a slap in the face is nothing by comparison.

I would not be able to sleep at night if i ever resorted to hitting a woman, in self defence or due to arrogance.

I've seen it too much to consider it, just wont happen..

" Cook me some eggs , or you get the bash"

Speaking of.... Anyone notice how many Kiwis there are on this site ?

I am a mortician in South Auckland, and I have seen the end results of family violence far too often. Patriarchal cultures should be outlawed. Because if the most respected person is the oldest male, then automatically the least respected is the youngest female.

reply to post by EnactedEgoTrip


yes it is a mentality. The only difference is in some countries it is frowned upon and in others socially acceptable.

x Nat

Originally posted by Thurisaz

looks like at the end of the url there is a space between the l ] ?

either way, I will check out the other link

G`day Thurisaz,good to see ya still around,I havn`t posted much over the past 1-2 years. I`m back to annoy some people once again


Cheers for heads up on the broken link,I just tried to fix it and in the edit its not allowing me to?

May need a Mod to clear it up.Give some work to do anyway,they could do with the practice now I`m back.

Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by badw0lf

 

Funny, you won't tell us what you would do

I cant tell you how to be a man, oozy... Wanna hold my hand?

It is not about handling a drunk lady, it is about me and who I'm which supports my point in regards to the OP, hence there are men who won't strike a women even if the law allows them to do so, and there are men who will strike women even if the law disallows them to do so.

Are you by any chance trying troll

Been here too long to play that game, silly. You just can't admit what you are..

But rather than drag this thread into further ill repute, I'll see you on the other side. You know I will...

Oh

Originally posted by littlecloud
reply to post by oozyism

 

And dont women have more rights in the west? (correct me if i am wrong)

In my very humble opinion, giving women too many rights is not necessarily a good thing. After millions of years of being physically dominated, cultures have grown to support their unique place... a place that, again in my very humble opinion, does not support the same rights that accord a man.

The cultural aspects of protecting women from physical violence are often enough (further evidenced that reporting of it to law men). Make no mistake though, if you go whooping on your wife, the little sister of Abu Bakur, for no good reason... you can be expecting a visit from the big brother.

In the West, in my humble opinion, double-think is predominant. Females are accorded all rights equal to men, and then given special protection as well as never asked to perform duties within the body politic that men are asked to perform. Duplicitous to its core.... and again, not necessarily a good thing.

reply to post by gps777


These men need to have a wife like mine. Queen of our home, if I were to beat her, in any way whatsoever, she would take my .44 from under the mattress and shoot me in the head, and I would deserve it. Any man who beats on a woman does not deserve to have a woman in his life, and that goes for you women who beat on your husbands too. We are not supposed to beat on each other, and kill each other, we are supposed to love each other. But, as long as religion rears it's ugly head in government, we are going to have laws that favour men. Step up, there women, and take your place. You outnumber men by a small, but real margin.

Man i have been waiting for this ruleing for months now. baby get over here so i can beat you now.

NOT COOL!

Ah! The UAE! Suppose to be the model of modernization in the Middle East. What do the supporters and sympathizers think about the Middle Eastern society now? Such backward and barbaric thinking.

I don't care what country a man is from or the size of the man (build wise ), any man that would beat on a woman, no matter what the circumstances, is a piss-poor excuse for a human being.

There is such a thing as removing yourself from a situation that can escalate to a physical confrontation.

A man that beats on a woman will beat a defenseless child and abuse defenseless animals. They're in the same catagory as pedophiles and murderers. Worthless.

Spit on them. A female is a precious gift. A man ain't nothing, and I do mean NOTHING, if he treats a female harshly. I know there are women out there that are naggers and hard to live with. Here's the remedy for them: Get away from them. They're poison.

A man that hits on a woman won't fight a man. There exists no words harsh or derogatory enough to describe this type of pathetic low-life scum.

If a woman punched me in the face, and it actually hurt, I would defend myself as I would against a man that hurt me. I have been punched a few times by drunk women, and I treated them just as I would a wussy guy, laughed at them until the bouncer came over and threw them out.

Up until 1975 (In 1975, South Dakota was the first State to remove this exception) all states precluded the prosecution for spousal rape. The last State to to remove the exception was North Carolina in 1993.

I don't see anything wrong with this.

It's akin to the "You can murder someone if you leave no evidence" law.

Originally posted by Intelearthling

There is such a thing as removing yourself from a situation that can escalate to a physical confrontation.

A man that beats on a woman will beat a defenseless child and abuse defenseless animals. They're in the same catagory as pedophiles and murderers. Worthless.

Spit on them.

A female is a precious gift. A man ain't nothing, and I do mean NOTHING, if he treats a female harshly.

Are you saying here that women who are violent will not beat a defenseless child or abuse defenseless animals and should not be in the same catagory as worthless pedophiles and murderers,which women also commit?

For you yourself to make a decission of only removing yourself from a violent women (running away),you are leaving this women to reoffend,what have you taught her?

These women often also shout for equality yet dont like it when they are treated equal,why then should they not be held accountable for their actions in your opinion.

The laws should be equal for both genders.

Give me an "S"
..give me an "H"
...give me an "A"
....give me an "R I A"

reply to post by gps777


sounds like the CIA's enhanced interrogations. As long as they don't leave a mark, it isn't torture. pathetic.

Originally posted by sakokrap

Originally posted by littlecloud
reply to post by oozyism

 

And dont women have more rights in the west? (correct me if i am wrong)

In my very humble opinion, giving women too many rights is not necessarily a good thing. After millions of years of being physically dominated, cultures have grown to support their unique place... a place that, again in my very humble opinion, does not support the same rights that accord a man.

The cultural aspects of protecting women from physical violence are often enough (further evidenced that reporting of it to law men). Make no mistake though, if you go whooping on your wife, the little sister of Abu Bakur, for no good reason... you can be expecting a visit from the big brother.

In the West, in my humble opinion, double-think is predominant. Females are accorded all rights equal to men, and then given special protection as well as never asked to perform duties within the body politic that men are asked to perform. Duplicitous to its core.... and again, not necessarily a good thing.

I expect that you will take a beating for this. But you are exactly correct. You cannot change things that just "are" without first going through all the pains of devloping the backbone of the new state, first.

The "duplicitous" status of our own gender equality system is just one set of problems.

Before anyone gets all upset, recognizing the phenomena is not giving a blessing to it.