It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did Bush Use Terrorists To Win Election? Evidence of Conspiracy

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:27 AM
link   
Please take a look at the following photo:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0b1aeb88df19.jpg[/atsimg]

Now thos photo has been discussed before here on ATS I have just found through the search function:

ATS Thread

This was 5 years ago however and focussed only on the photo, which members agreed was innocent and a unfortunate photo opportunity. However I have just come across the following material, without a source, on a financial website:

Enterprise Corruption

I have had to screen grab the information, the website owner won't mind, he actively encourages us to propogate his material and I am constantly plugging the site. Please take time to read all of the following information, and then base your reaction on your gut feeling before you read any of the links I post afterwards:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8b4548bf7885.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/2e494a68872c.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/05bcd25c5100.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e57f7e0d52d9.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/aebbbc318305.jpg[/atsimg]



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:36 AM
link   
It was a bit fishy that a Bin Laden video surfaced right before the 2004 elections. I remember a lot of idiots tell me we need to vote for Bush because the 'terrorists' want Kerry to get elected. With out a doubt I'd say Bush used the terrorism scare tactic to help him get re-elected.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:36 AM
link   
There is quite a lot of reading there, but hopefully it has sparked your attention. Here are some supplementary links I have found thus far:

Sami Al-Arian


Al-Arian met then-candidate George W. Bush at a campaign event at the Florida Strawberry Festival in March 2000, and Bush and his wife posed for a photo with Al-Arian and his family. Al-Arian later claimed to have spoken to Bush about the government use of "secret evidence" in deportation proceedings against accused terrorists. When Bush subsequently brought up the issue in a debate with Al Gore, Al-Arian was reportedly "thrilled—and began registering local Muslims to vote, and promoting Bush's candidacy at local mosques." He also lobbied Congress on civil liberties matters, contributed thousands of dollars to the campaigns of influential members of Congress, and renounced violence during television appearances.


Article Discussing Photo

Grover Norquist


Norquist and Americans for Tax Reform were mentioned in Senate testimony relating to the lobbying scandal for which Abramoff pled guilty in 2006. Norquist has denied claims that he did anything wrong. Records released by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee allege that ATR served as a "conduit" for funds that flowed from Abramoff's clients to surreptitiously finance grass-roots lobbying campaigns.


Norquist has allready been implicated in fraudulent activities.

Karl Rove


Though no allegations have been proven or sustained, Rove's name has come up in political scandals, including the Valerie Plame affair, the Bush White House e-mail controversy and the related dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy.


Again it would seem he is quite a shady character.

This raises serious questions about where these funds are coming from. Incidentaly I have been working on a thread which deals with this issue, and If you look at the facts and figures you will be truly shocked I would imagine to see that foreign nationals are literally buying up your nation.

Who Owns Congress?

Is this one big coincidence? It would seem that there is too much linking these people and their activities for it not be a conspiracy. Have you guys ever heard anything about this in the past?



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:40 AM
link   
reply to post by jrod
 


Though I agree, that is not what this is about. There seems to be some grade of evidence that implicates Bush and his advisors dealing directly with known, convicted terrorists and monetary transactions take place.

He used them and their money to win an election, and then did a u-turn and fought against muslims. The foundations and tax-relief groups still maintained making donations however.

Have you read all the information? You were pretty quick posting. Have you seen this photo before?



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:45 AM
link   
Hmm...

Well, my first reaction is, dur, of course he did...

and actually after reconsidering it...I am of the same conclusion..


and will he ever be called on it newp. Will anyone in the former administration stand up for war crimes? nope, I am over it...he is gone



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:48 AM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


He may be gone, but this still happened. Also donations by foreign nations of which 90% are untracable is sill happening, on a much larger scale than ever before. Therefore, the same could be happening now with the mid terms.

Is the title of the thread misleading?



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:49 AM
link   
I realize that I'm a bit off topic. Can you expect anything different from a politician?



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:51 AM
link   
reply to post by jrod
 


Star for your sarcasm. If you are in politics, are you concerend where all the donations are coming from?



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 11:53 AM
link   
reply to post by carlitomoore
 


Well, I can only hope that America will wake up and seriously question any call to war, or any big stunt going on ever...the one potential silver lining in the whole mess.

but, America won't...would be silly to think we have smartened up.

I don't care who is president or running congress...they need some serious bulletproof facts and solid logic before anything is done in -my- name.

But then again, I felt that way in 2001 as much as now. I did support smacking Afhganistan mind you, but not in the way it was carried out. spys and drones would have been far more effective.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 12:03 PM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


I seriously disagree with your opinions on Afghanistan.

I hope people take time to read the information and make an informative reply. These guys are still running your country through big business and through global capitalism. People need to understand what is happening here.

More and more information like this is becoming public all of the time. There will be sever backlash from actions like this, and we will more than likely be left picking up the pieces.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 12:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by carlitomoore
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


I seriously disagree with your opinions on Afghanistan.

I hope people take time to read the information and make an informative reply. These guys are still running your country through big business and through global capitalism. People need to understand what is happening here.

More and more information like this is becoming public all of the time. There will be sever backlash from actions like this, and we will more than likely be left picking up the pieces.


I wasn't clear
I was for smacking Afhganistan back in the clinton administration..they were rabid anti-western, destroying the culture of the land, invaders of the people, brutalist regime that seen the native afhgani's as defeated slaves.
the 9/11 incident frankly just accomplished what I personally seen was inevitable anyhow based on their high desires to go jihad.
My information did not come from America either, actually, when I was in America, I barely even heard of the country, it was when I was travelling the world and read up stuff America didn't report about for whatever reason is when I frowned at the warlords of that nation. The people there made north korea seem reasonable and pro-west.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 12:30 PM
link   
To answer the OP's question: Umm, yeah! Duh.

Of course Bush used terrorists to win elections. He also used them to conduct 9/11 and he escorted the Bin Laden out of the country on 9/11 by AIR when no other civilians were allowed to use aircraft.

Bush + Terrorists go together like Coaches + Players.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 12:38 PM
link   
Videos surrounding those involved:











I completely forgot about the plance crash which killed Mike Donnell, Karl Roves' It guru. Was that a result of the potential truth about the donations and the shadowy relationships coming out? I never read much about the incident.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by harrytuttle
 


Though it may seem obvious tha the has 'ties' in the past, as far as I am aware there has never been any evidence. I am simply trying post some information and try to piece it all together.

So far, has anyone read what has been posted? No one has commented on the photo, the alleged meets or the relationships forged.



posted on Oct, 16 2010 @ 05:16 PM
link   
I see someone starred my last post but no-one has contributed since. Please share your view on the material posted, no-one has yet done that on this thread!!!



posted on Oct, 23 2010 @ 02:35 PM
link   
This is Illuminati incredible.
Or credible.
Be friends with the community and groups to win election all the
while knowing, well Bush would not know only told to mingle,
that the chiefs would be taken down and arrested.




top topics



 
3

log in

join