It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mystery NYC UFO Twitter pic seen around the world

page: 3
13
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 02:52 AM
link   
ok i see i dnt use twitter but i knew and somehow forgot that each tweet shows time and date,duh, so other than that we really cant be 100% sure that he produced that picture the same day he tweeted which leads us to another dead end,given his computer/editing skills theres many conclusions one can draw.. the photo could be a fake or genuine, why the hell is the truth so elusive!!??



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 02:58 AM
link   
Oh man its Roswell all over again !!!



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by youdidntseeme
reply to post by AutOmatIc
 


ok heres some more info.....

on the 12th he tweeted "@rodclarkdotcom @josh_diamond @teradek @jennifersarahm absolutely see all of you Wed night. Get ready!"
12th tweet

Wednesday night was the 13th when everything was going down. I checked the other twitter accts that he sent the message to. Josh_diamond's was the most intriguing. He made multiple tweets about this talking about the news coverage it received and telling people to watch out for blue discs in the sky. Seems like these artists might be enjoying their hoax a little too publicly. here is the link to joshdiamond:
josh diamonds twitter

The other two recipients of the 'Get ready' tweet havnt responded as such, but this is enough to seem like a hoax to me. Still doesnt answer the question of who told him to take it down and not talk about it.
A good start here so far.


Good work. Very interesting.

I wonder were a group of people given a project that would captivate the general public. All those ufo believers could jump up and shout 'we were right all along' and then few weeks later the elaborate hoax was revealed.(making a lolt of people look like idiots). And maybe the people given this project let the cat out of the bag a couple of days early not realising the importance of it.

I remember watching a documentary on some folk that were paid to make man-made crop circles to destroy any credibility for crop circles. This event reminds of me of that.

It has of course all been nicely tidied up with a nice teacher and classroom of kids.

hmmmmm?



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:07 AM
link   
To try and pin down the exact date that the image was 'tweeted' I did a little digging and came up with just 2 possible hits. Too bad no one took a screencap that day. I did find alot of hits with the url to the removed twitpic dated from the 9th but here are the two hits i found attributing his orig tweet to the 9th:

link 1

link 2



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:07 AM
link   
reply to post by JohnySeagull
 


revealing it doesn't exactly work out though does it! lol, the believers just start shouting that it the admission is just a cover up! lol.

thanks

rich



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:09 AM
link   
reply to post by youdidntseeme
 


just a suggestion but would the wayback machine be of help with that?.

unfortunately i have no p.c at mo, and can only use ps3 web browser so im a bit limited in capabilities!.

thanks

rich



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by R3KR
Oh man its Roswell all over again !!!


Heh...yea it seems like that, but you have to follow the clues..in this case the twits..er tweets



Originally posted by Mental Maze
ok i see i dnt use twitter but i knew and somehow forgot that each tweet shows time and date,duh, so other than that we really cant be 100% sure that he produced that picture the same day he tweeted which leads us to another dead end,given his computer/editing skills theres many conclusions one can draw.. the photo could be a fake or genuine, why the hell is the truth so elusive!!??


Well I'm not 100% sure however it seems his friends all knew that he had taken the picture and that it was the one that caused the frenzy according to one of his acquaintances here:

twitter.com...

...this @emerywells who is associated with this guy tweeted this "[BREAKING] @jasondiamond discovers UFO over manhattan skyline - creates frenzy j.mp... check the photo cred
"

Which is the exact same thing that @josh_diamond tweeted here:

twitter.com...

These guys are connected. Also they all are associated and well versed in CGI lingo and know all about filters, Red Giant and Foundry plugins which are After Effects plugins.

...more dots to connect...



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by youdidntseeme
To try and pin down the exact date that the image was 'tweeted' I did a little digging and came up with just 2 possible hits. Too bad no one took a screencap that day. I did find alot of hits with the url to the removed twitpic dated from the 9th but here are the two hits i found attributing his orig tweet to the 9th:

link 1

link 2



Fantastic! The first link indeed nails down the fact that the pic @jasondiamond attached to his original tweet was the very same pic he's credited with. Look at the link number : 2w1r98

His original tweet states : "# I totally caught a UFO hovering over the upper east side #NYC... #UFO #october13 #disclosure twitpic.com... 11:12 AM Oct 9th via SocialScope"

Pic link number is an exact match. And the thumbnail (which is still visible for some reason) for the original pic matches the pic he's attributed to.

So if he didn't take the picture that everyone attributed him to, he at least tweeted it a full 4 days before the sighting. Proof!


edit on 15-10-2010 by AutOmatIc because: link number

edit on 15-10-2010 by AutOmatIc because: thumbnail



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:21 AM
link   
reply to post by AutOmatIc
 


good stuff, hopefully we can find a 4chan link now.

thanks

rich



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:26 AM
link   
This story really made it big, even more media links than the much more credible china ufo..of course its due to the fact it happened in NY, although doesnt anyone think its odd that even with the world changing events that happened in NY that there was no military reported at any time during the day of the sighting(so far)not even a scout plane,i didnt see or hear any planes throughout the day on any footage or earthcams,not till after dark did the jets make an appearence.. what could this mean?theres a huge chance that they were balloons, but what if they werent?could this "sighting have been military controlled?or was the military just as perplexed as new yorkers but kept their distance to prevent panic?



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:31 AM
link   
reply to post by AutOmatIc
 


Great job.
Now this raises a more intrueging question..why did the woman claim that the picture was just a photo of her balloons



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mental Maze
reply to post by AutOmatIc
 


Great job.
Now this raises a more intriguing question..why did the woman claim that the picture was just a photo of her balloons


Thanks for the help! I'm thinking that they (the teacher and students) saw the pic in the nydailypost and assumed it was the balloons that they had launched on the 13th. But we've already shown that to be impossible. So...the question I come up with is, were their balloons the ones seen on the 13th? And, why did @jasondiamond take down his original pic? And how did they know 4 days in advance that the sighting would be explained away by most people as "balloons"? Which by a strange "coincidence" is exactly what @jasondiamond original pic looked like...
edit on 15-10-2010 by AutOmatIc because: balloons



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mental Maze
reply to post by AutOmatIc
 


Great job.
Now this raises a more intrueging question..why did the woman claim that the picture was just a photo of her balloons


maybe she didn't in reality, a lot of the time the clips on news are set up in the way of how they interview someone, example : when someones family member is killed and its on the news it almost always has a shot of the family holding a photo of the deceased.

so maybe she just originally claimed that the video of the balloon cluster was her balloons but for the interview they just gave her the paper as a plot device.

thanks

rich



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by AutOmatIc

Originally posted by Mental Maze
reply to post by AutOmatIc
 


Great job.
Now this raises a more intriguing question..why did the woman claim that the picture was just a photo of her balloons


Thanks for the help! I'm thinking that they (the teacher and students) saw the pic in the nydailypost and assumed it was the balloons that they had launched on the 13th. But we've already shown that to be impossible. So...the question I come up with is, were their balloons the ones seen on the 13th? And, why did @jasondiamond take down his original pic? And how did they know 4 days in advance that the sighting would be explained away by most people as "balloons"? Which by a strange "coincidence" is exactly what @jasondiamond original pic looked like...
edit on 15-10-2010 by AutOmatIc because: balloons


well the yellow balloons were not only a part of a celebration of gran via but were also apparently some kind of advertising campaign according to this : gothamist.com...

so maybe jason diamond had some knowledge of the yellow balloon release in advance, maybe hes done some work for either the company in question or the celebration.

thanks

rich



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:49 AM
link   
i wish i had a damn pc,this ps3 is so damn limited,i was surprised it was compatible with earthcam lol.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:50 AM
link   
reply to post by Mental Maze
 


snap! lol



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 03:58 AM
link   
Did anyone else watch the midtown earthcam that night?i know the feed was about 10 seconds per image but there was still a whole lot of unexplained lights,i know that most could have been air traffic but there was so many lights for hours..i didnt take the light flare ups too seriously because the poor image quality could have caused the large pixels to blur creating the effect but still its hard to beleive that all the lights were air traffic.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 04:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mental Maze
Did anyone else watch the midtown earthcam that night?i know the feed was about 10 seconds per image but there was still a whole lot of unexplained lights,i know that most could have been air traffic but there was so many lights for hours..i didnt take the light flare ups too seriously because the poor image quality could have caused the large pixels to blur creating the effect but still its hard to beleive that all the lights were air traffic.


i think thats been satisfactorily explained now :

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

thanks

rich



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 04:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by RICH-ENGLAND

well the yellow balloons were not only a part of a celebration of gran via but were also apparently some kind of advertising campaign according to this : gothamist.com...

so maybe jason diamond had some knowledge of the yellow balloon release in advance, maybe hes done some work for either the company in question or the celebration.

thanks

rich


Yea I noticed that but as both jason and josh work at another company called MBS Productions, after scanning what the company was up to in its blogs, didn't see anything about them being involved with this particular balloon release.

However they do seem to have an extremely coincidental knowledge of the NYC UFO "disclosure" on the 13th, and the original pic looked like balloons...so I'm still digging into the tweets to see if there are any more clues...
edit on 15-10-2010 by AutOmatIc because: clues



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 05:16 AM
link   
...no further leads, though I did send a tweet to @jasondiamond asking what happened to the pic...will post his response if I get one, seems better to get it from the proverbial horses mouth



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join