Looks terribly fake, maybe look again, my guess is its fake from stock footage, the Pentagon strike does have many legitimate areas for investigation
though - when I saw the flight plan and spiral 270 degree (?) twist dropping 'some' amount of height, hitting light poles but the plane was some how
alright and then hits the building, but the damage looks really small and then there's Rumsfelt not at his desk communicating but helping out a hand.
All adds up and 2 +2 equals 5.
To me it looks more like a TOW or Dragon fired from the street level.
Looks fake because the rocket trail starts from the street level and is not carried from ‘off frame’
It's reversed. ? why?
The shadows and weather look similar to the morning of 9/11.
This is the first thing that has actually looked anything like a plane hitting the Pentagon.
Who was filming this and why is the important question - if it's legitimate.
This is a .gif of what appears to be a youtube video. Can anyone get the actual youtube link here, instead of a gif that is way too short. This needs
some background info about the who what where when and why of the video. Not stating its fake or real, just backwards. Lets find the real vid before
making anymore conclusions.
the odd camera movement/angle makes it look like it was shot from a helicopter or something along those lines, definitely high up .. a google
satellite image might help give an idea where the camera was located approximately .. you can tell by the sun at that point about what time of day it
would be..
the other thing is the fact the bottom portion of the video is blacked out .. that is odd
It's been known for some time, as you can see from the 1.7 million hits on the youtube video.
The biggest reason it is fake is the ridiculous fireball upon impact doesn't match at all the real explosion that happened. I mean just look at the
way this stupid idiot leaves a straight line and obvious seam when the explosion happens in this video. It is horrible CGI. That's about it. It was
added to previous footage of the pentagon taken from a helicopter.
after only a few seconds of youtube searching, here is the link to the actual video. The "missile" is obviously a fake -- I could tell the first time
I saw it. Probably why the gif is shortened and reversed, in a hope to make it look more realistic:
edit on 13-10-2010 by youdidntseeme because: fix embed code
Excellent... yeah it wasn't making much sense to me.. I was looking at satellite maps and figured it had to be from a copter or some other aircraft
just given the angle .. couldn't imagine it being that convenient that someone was filming at the right time..
Case closed... that video is clearly CG, badly done CG ...
I just realized something: the Pentagon is only 77 feet tall. Must have been a pretty skilled pilot to get an airliner that low to the ground for a
direct hit without (A) landing on the ground, (B) crashing into the ground, or (C) striking the roof of the Pentagon instead of smashing into the side
of it. I'm assuming this theory has been debated to death already.
edit on 13-10-2010 by xiphias because: (no reason given)
But until I see a field with all the parts of the supposed plane that hit the pentagon trying to be reassembled like all the other accidents that
happen, it was a missile in my mind.
Oh wait that wont happen... all the wreckage was sent to china the next day to be "recycled"
Crash investigations atttempt to reassemble wreckage when they are not sure as to what caused the aircraft to crash. It is NOT done with every
investigation. And with the four jets on 9/11, there really wasn't a question as to why they crashed. And, btw, the wreckage of the aircraft that
was recovered, was not sent to China. After the FBI was done with it, it was returned to the respective airlines.
No way it was a 757 that hit the pentagon. Whatever hit was flying horizontal just above the ground and had a pointy nose, either a missle, a drone or
other small aircraft. A 757 could not maintain lift so close to the ground.