It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Same UFO Filmed, Same Day, Different Place - 10-10-10

page: 5
37
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:39 PM
link   
reply to post by adigregorio
 


Well if you would have actually read my post you would see I commented on the "new topic". Since you would rather dismiss information I can see why you didn't even read my post. It must have contained to many words for you to handle.

Now go ahead an tell me I'm wrong, and you read it all. It's the internet after all, you can lie all you want.
edit on 12-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Άδης
 


Well according to the videographer of the car chase, that semi was going to deal with "something"

Someone assumed it was this light, and well, here we are!

Has anyone watched the video again to see the semi? If so, any ideas on what it is carrying? Is it indeed an "air lift"?



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by 0ne10
 


"By the way...There is lots of construction going on in Garden Grove."

Not where they were driving, and I can get the proof to back that up.

GG Blvd is tore up right now, but they are not working around the area they were.

EDIT-
Furthermore, it does not take "six cops" to move construction equipment.
edit on 10/12/2010 by adigregorio because: Further



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:42 PM
link   
reply to post by 0ne10
 



The Garden Grove UFO was a genuine case, AT FIRST, then a curious person with his cell phone figured he would do his own investigation and drive towards the UFO to figure out what it was. It turned out to be an RC toy, and the police were detaining the pilot, and he got it on camera. But that first hand evidence is not good enough for you die hard UFO fanatics because it could be a stupid "cover up". Now you are falling hopelessly into the bottomless pit of speculation because you don't want to accept a certain outcome.



It's gotten VERY VERY VERY confusing. As far as I saw there WAS no conclusion to the Garden Grove UFO sighting/video. They were to upload more videos later on. The video ony came out last night!!!!!!!!!!!

Way to go Mods! This is a mess now and people really put their effort and hearts into these cases trying to study them! Now we have a whole bunch of unrelated UFO videos complied into this thread.

I give up too.




posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:43 PM
link   
Sorry guys, once again the sad, sad reality to your alien visits....




He was a teenager who put some led lights on a remote control plane. The reason police, and the so-called men in black was there was because it was actually FAA agents. This kids in some big trouble, so remember that next time you decide to hoax a ufo visit kids.

Note: The reason the lights are green is because power is off. When power is turned on they become blue.
edit on 12-10-2010 by Mr_skepticc because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


I have chosen to stick it out, this will make for one heck of a discussion!

Since this is the first time I have been in a thread with two different topics!

(Do I have to have both topics in a response for it to be on topic?)

topic

Seriously though, can we please have that other thread back? I think I have done a great job showing these are un-related without going off-topic or questioning actions (until now).

(I do respect decisions, doesn't mean I agree with them. I am sorry.)



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Mr_skepticc
 


Watch for the MIB at :34


Second lines are AWESOME!

Oh, and I am just sayin' MIB they may just be a guy in a suit...



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by 0ne10
 


Not where they were driving, and I can get the proof to back that up.

GG Blvd is tore up right now, but they are not working around the area they were.

EDIT-
Furthermore, it does not take "six cops" to move construction equipment.
edit on 10/12/2010 by adigregorio because: Further


This is a good example of you creating every excuse you can think of to dismiss information...

They were DRIVING to a location. That means the construction was not in that area, they were driving to the area.


Yes it DOES take "six cops" to move construction equipment, especially when it is over sized. When you have to shut down entire roads so those over sized trucks could make turns which otherwise would be illegal, you need the police there to help block the roads safely.

I had the privileged to watch a company haul a 100ft yacht from the location it was built, to the water. They loaded it on an over sized truck, they got the power companies on call so they can disconnect and reconnect all the power lines that the yacht had to pass under, and there was TEN cops with their lights flashing, blocking roads ahead of the convoy.

So you are spreading lies and misinformation just because you need to create excuses to further your confusion and speculation. It's retarded.
edit on 12-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by 0ne10

Then a news report comes forward confirming the first hand witness account that it was an RC toy, and the police caught the pilot, but you again dismiss that because you believe it to be some cover up. While falling in your bottomless pit you were thrown another safety rope of truth, and you failed to grab it because of your sickness you call "seeking truth". You think you are seeking truth, but when you constantly dismiss information, what you really are doing is seeking false information and speculation.

out of your useless rant I caught something that makes me think you're misinformed...

"Then a news report comes forward confirming the first hand witness account that it was an RC toy, and the police caught the pilot, but you again dismiss that because you believe it to be some cover up" Care to give the source for that statement? There is speculation for a reason, EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS believe IT WAS NOT an RC, they even said so on the news report. As I stated earlier, Hector Cortez, an EYEWITNESS, described the unidentified flying object seen on October 10, as two times the size of a helicopter (@ 45 seconds)... care to give any source for your statement quoted on this post? Thanks
edit on 12-10-2010 by Enter Ruin because: typo



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
Sorry guys, once again the sad, sad reality to your alien visits....




He was a teenager who put some led lights on a remote control plane. The reason police, and the so-called men in black was there was because it was actually FAA agents. This kids in some big trouble, so remember that next time you decide to hoax a ufo visit kids.

Note: The reason the lights are green is because power is off. When power is turned on they become blue.
edit on 12-10-2010 by Mr_skepticc because: (no reason given)



Finding a guy holding a remote control box is like 'finding' the passport in the rumble on 9-11!!!

I am not saying this (these....all of them) aren't toys but just 'because' we see convenient proof (posed next to an authority figure) doesn't make a case true! If anything, red flags should be waving a little bit.
Sheesh, haven't you learned anything by now?



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by 0ne10
This is a good example of you creating every excuse you can think of to dismiss information...

And this is a GREAT example of you using correlation equals causation:
(It doesn't by the way)


Originally posted by 0ne10
They were DRIVING to a location. That means the construction was not in that area, they were driving to the area.



Originally posted by 0ne10
Yes it DOES take "six cops" to move construction equipment, especially when it is over sized.

Source?

Originally posted by 0ne10
When you have to shut down entire roads so those over sized trucks could make turns which otherwise would be illegal, you need the police there to help block the roads safely.

Well all of these vehicles were driving recklessly, and the cops weren't doing what you described. Did you watch the video?


Originally posted by 0ne10
I had the privileged to watch a company haul a 100ft yacht from the location it was built, to the water.

Ahh proof by authority is it?


Originally posted by 0ne10
So you are spreading lies and misinformation just because you need to create excuses to further you confusion and speculation. It's retarded.

And more insults! FTW!

Only one speculating is you, I never said any constants like "That means the construction was not in that area, they were driving to the area."



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Yea I have learned that some people can't seem to face the truth even when it slaps them right across the face. They story and video I posted was the ending of all this. Call the police dept there if you dont believe me.



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by DaWhiz
 


I may have been confusing these two similar posts. I thought they were both footage of the campus UFO. That would mean a lighted kite. Helicopter was sent and then the arrest of the owner.

Is there really a curfew on R/C Kites?



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Mr_skepticc
 


Just for the record, I agree that 1/2 of this threads topic is about an LED kite.

The other 1/2 is what I want to discuss, the 1/2 with the HUGE semi and cops.

I guess it is easier to call me a retard than discuss the topic, I wouldn't know given my mental status.

EDIT-
Mr Skeptic has been awesome, it was ANOTHER poster who insulted me.

SORRY Mr. Skeptic!!!!
edit on 10/12/2010 by adigregorio because: Oops!



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Mr_skepticc
 


Sorry. How did you post the ending when the beginning just came out yesterday?

But putting that aside for a moment (assuming it's the same UFO incident but not necessarily the same people involved) who cares that a remote was found? To me it looks like complete staging!

And putting THAT aside, since when is it illegal to hold a remote control apparatus? Why were the cops called out there? To arrest the remote-control operator? Damn, what do they do with fishermen over there?

I think we're discussing two (or possibly four) different separate events in south California over the weekend.

But no worries......the Mods thought it this was fair to put all these videos together so fair........... it is



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


I thought Mr. Skeptic was saying that video was the end of the 1/2 of the thread about the "kite"?

Is it about the ending of the car chase that happened last night?

I do NOT agree with that, unless a time machine was involved.



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 12:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tribble
reply to post by DaWhiz
 


I may have been confusing these two similar posts. I thought they were both footage of the campus UFO. That would mean a lighted kite. Helicopter was sent and then the arrest of the owner.

Is there really a curfew on R/C Kites?



Well join the club!!!! The post that got CLOSED had NOTHING to do with the college sighting. But once again, let's use up a bunch of bandwidth explaining this over and over and over again.



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 01:02 PM
link   
Ok...I'd like to ask a question about this kite/RC thing. One or the other seems like a reasonable explanation, but what about the turbulence from the rotors from the helicopter? I would venture to guess that none would be able to hover or maneuver around a helicopter flying around them without being blown away...

Also, I would like to ask the OP, KilIuminati, to rejoin this thread because I find his input critical to the thread that was moved from "Breaking News day after 10-10-10 SO CAL Garden Grove"

I live in So Cal (IE) and find all this very interesting to say the least!!

And thanks, adigregorio, for offering to lend your help in gaining more info...



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 01:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Enter Ruin
out of your useless rant I caught something that makes me think you're misinformed...

"Then a news report comes forward confirming the first hand witness account that it was an RC toy, and the police caught the pilot, but you again dismiss that because you believe it to be some cover up" Care to give the source for that statement?


YOU are the only one with the USELESS RANT! Here is me doing your own research for you......

ABC LOCAL NEWS



GARDEN GROVE, Calif. (KABC) -- An unusual blue light darting back and forth in the sky was seen over the city of Garden Grove on Sunday night. Several calls were made to Eyewitness News and to Garden Grove police regarding the blue light. Police said the light was from a long-haul trucker who was in a hotel parking lot flying his remote control plane. It's not illegal, but it did cause a stir in the area.


EXAMINER



On Sunday night, residents of Garden Grove, California became concerned after seeing a mysterious blue light dart back and forth in the sky. Local news media, along with law enforcement received calls about the strange light that those living in the area couldn’t explain. According to ABC News, the light actually turned out to be caused by a long-haul trucker flying a remote control plane in a hotel parking lot, according to police. ABC reports that the trucker’s actions weren’t illegal, but “did cause a stir in the area.”


Useless rant.......




Originally posted by Enter Ruin
There is speculation for a reason, EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS believe IT WAS NOT an RC, they even said so on the news report.


There is speculation because you people create every excuse you can think of to dismiss any and all information that will kill your want and need for UFO sightings. It's like a sickness.

Here is an EYEWITNESS ACCOUNT who is NOT a confused lost soul:

www.youtube.com...



I was parking my car at my house when i noticed these lights hovering over the Crown Plaza on Chapman and Harbor. We drove over there and we were right under it and vanished. 20 minutes later it came back and drove overthere ang cought it on video. IT TURNED OUT TO BE AND RC PLANE WITH CUSTOM LEDS! GUY got arrested BOOOOO! see the Arrest on my other vid


The only people who thought it wasn't an RC were the confused idiots.



Originally posted by Enter Ruin
As I stated earlier, Hector Cortez, an EYEWITNESS, described the unidentified flying object seen on October 10, as two times the size of a helicopter (@ 45 seconds)... care to give any source for your statement quoted on this post? Thanks


Yeah, and my thumb is the size of the Sun when I hold it up in the air.... :@@ Hector Cortez is a confused fool with no measuring skills.

This is so retarded.
edit on 12-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2010 @ 01:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


I can help if you are confused!

I will make my posts like this from now on:

Kite 1/2 of topic:
I still say that the original topic of this thread is MOST LIKELY (those are key words, I am not YELLING!!!!) one of those LED kites. Just because that is what the evidence leans to.

I am not "set in stone" but let's just say the clay is hardening.

California UFO Car Chase 1/2 of topic:
Since this took place on a different day than the first 1/2 of this threads' topic. I am finding it hard accepting that someone would be posting the video of the "Kite's capture" as proof of the California Car Chase...

Unless they are confused, though I think I am doing remarkably well. Considering my circumstances, take that ADHD!



new topics

top topics



 
37
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join