It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Death?

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 04:30 PM
link   
Are you a person who is pro-life or are you a person who is pro-death?

1. Do you support abortion
2. Do you support euthenasia
3. Do you support death penalty

If you said yes to all 3 you are pro-death, if you said no to all 3 you are pro-life.

Yes to 1 & 2 but No to 3 you are pro-choice
Yes to 1 & 3 but No to 2 you are pro-death
Yes to 2 & 3 but No to 1 you are pro-death

No to 1 & 2 but Yes to 3 you are pro-control
No to 1 & 3 but Yes to 2 you are pro-life
No to 2 & 3 but Yes to 1 you are pro-control



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 04:34 PM
link   
I am apparently "pro death" but, hey, I'm still fun at parties and make a hell of a guacamole salad.

I don't believe in euthanasia but said yes to numbers 1 and 3. I support abortion because as a man I don't feel comfortable telling a woman what she may or may not do with her body. I said yes to number 3 because, let's face it, some people just need to not be here any longer. I don't want Jeffrey Dahmer in my tribe, isolated or not.

~Heff



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 04:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Misoir
 





1. Do you support abortion


Yes.




2. Do you support euthenasia


Yes.





3. Do you support death penalty


No.

Seems like I am pro-choice.



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 04:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hefficide

I don't want Jeffrey Dahmer in my tribe, isolated or not.

~Heff


You don't have to worry about that. Jeffrey Dahmer was killed in prison in 1994.

I'm pro death and also pro Youth in Asia and pro youth just about anywhere actually.
edit on 8-10-2010 by whaaa because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 05:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by whaaa

You don't have to worry about that. Jeffrey Dahmer was killed in prison in 1994.



Whaaa,

I was aware of that, but he seemed like a better example than the plethora of lesser known names on death row these days!


Knowing the names of serial killers is sssooo 1987 !


~Heff



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Hefficide
 


I am vehemently against the death penalty on the grounds that neither the state nor another person has the right to make decision about whether another persons life is worthy of keeping or not, PERIOD.

And another reason is this:

Why do we kill people, who kill people, to show people, that killing people, is wrong?



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Against abortion for the most part
Youth in asia ... hmmmm, not sure
Totally against death penalty. i know that will piss most people off, but i just don't see the point in legalizing revenge.



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 07:57 PM
link   
...i'm pro choice on abortion and suicide...

...i'm pro death penalty for murderers, child molesters and kidnappers...


Originally posted by Misoir
Why do we kill people, who kill people, to show people, that killing people, is wrong?


...you used two too many commas...


...seriously, thats not the death penalty's function... the death penalty makes sure that particular murderer doesnt murder again... simple...

...since you're opposed to the death penalty - does that mean you approve of a big chunk of your tax dollars going to support convicted murderers for the rest of their lives?...



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   
Well that was an easy one,
guess I am pro-death.

Cool!



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Misoir
 


Are you a person who is pro-life or are you a person who is pro-death?





I'm Pro Active...


Which means I'm not limited in my choices and don't get suckered into circular arguments...case-by-case dude.





posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 08:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
 


That means I believe no one has the right to make a decision about another persons life. I don't care what the cost is, our natural rights are not something to be thrown out the door.



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 08:27 PM
link   
For me the first 2 depend on the circumstances..

Abortion, yes up to a point.. I'm not sure how far through the pregnancy it should be though...

Euthenasia, yes but strictly regulated, as sad as it is there are some greedy childred out there..

Death Penalty, No. Because there are too many false convictions and because I believe anyone truly beyond rehabilitation probably has severe mental problems, and so killing them would be in-human.



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 08:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by March of the Fire Ants
and because I believe anyone truly beyond rehabilitation probably has severe mental problems, and so killing them would be in-human.


this. i dont believe anyone is just "plain evil" - i think once you're to the point of being a serial killer, it's a totally different thing than just "being a jerk"



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 09:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Misoir
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
 


That means I believe no one has the right to make a decision about another persons life.


...lets say you saw someone about to be hit by a bus... would you try to intervene?... i think you would but i dont know how you would rationalize making THAT decision since you believe "no one has a right to make a decision about another person's life"...

...thats not what you meant, is it?... you meant strictly in the matter of taking someone's life, right?...

...okay, well, what if someone broke into your home with the intent of murdering you or a loved one?... would you let them because of your stance "no one has a right to make a decision about another person's life" - or - would that go right out the window when survival mode kicked in?...

...still not what you meant?... well, maybe you could explain it to me, if you want to...


Originally posted by Misoir
I don't care what the cost is, our natural rights are not something to be thrown out the door.


...are there ever any reasons why a person should lose their natural rights?...

...imo, a murderer chooses to void his natural rights when he commits murder... so, arent you giving murderers extra rights by allowing them to live rather than be executed?...

...btw, allowing them to live is also making a decision about their life...

...i'll go bother someone else now...



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 09:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Misoir
1. Do you support abortion


I support a woman's right to make the decision to get an abortion or keep the child.


Originally posted by Misoir
2. Do you support euthanasia


I support a person's right to voluntarily euthanize themselves for any reason they deem appropriate.


Originally posted by Misoir
3. Do you support death penalty


I support the justice system's right to execute someone who has taken the life of another human.

I guess I am pro-death. Nothing wrong with that, in my mind.



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 09:49 PM
link   
Weird that some people are OK with killing unborn babies, but are OK with letting the most extreme murderers live. Yet they are called Pro-Choice? What choice did that unborn baby have? Did the murderers victims have a choice?



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 09:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Misoir
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
 


That means I believe no one has the right to make a decision about another persons life. I don't care what the cost is, our natural rights are not something to be thrown out the door.


Hard to believe you are just 18 years old.
There is still time though....with age comes wisdom. Here's hoping you live till 110....because you need the extra time to catch up.

You have just thrown the entire justice system under the bus with this statement.



posted on Oct, 8 2010 @ 09:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Wyn Hawks
 


Yes, I meant strictly in the terms of deciding the fate of someones life(as in the possibility of death penalty).
edit on 10/8/2010 by Misoir because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2010 @ 02:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Carseller4
Weird that some people are OK with killing unborn babies, but are OK with letting the most extreme murderers live. Yet they are called Pro-Choice? What choice did that unborn baby have? Did the murderers victims have a choice?


I would never kill an unborn baby. I am pro-choice till 5th month of fetal development (better to draw the line earlier, just to be sure), till there is no functioning brain, no consciousness, just a mass of nonthinking cells. Its not human being. After the develoment of consciousness (5-6th month) I am strictly PROLIFE. Even in cases of rape and incest. You cannot justify killing a human being, for any reason, but there is nothing wrong with killing a mass of unconscious cells, for any reason, even economic ones.

I think that my position is logical, isnt it? I for one cosider the position of people who support abortion only in case of rape and incest, and do not support other reasons for it highly illogical - either it is a human being (human person), then you cannot kill it for ANY reason, or it is not, therefore it is a thing, and you can terminate it for any reason its owner deemes appropiate.



posted on Oct, 9 2010 @ 02:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Misoir
 


I'm Pro-death

Your's before mine, but whatever.
edit on 9-10-2010 by In nothing we trust because: (no reason given)







 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join