a reply to:
monkeySEEmonkeyDO
I don't know the rules on these news stories that were first reported and then (probably) censored but I heard some pretty astonishing comments from
the US military during that time when Trump and North Korea were going round and round with the threats: it was reported by a general that North Korea
had the capacity to nuke the US mainland killing up to 200 million people. This was on MSNBC.
I thought this was astonishing and I waited for a rebuttal; obviously the North Koreans did not have enough nuclear weapons to kill 10% of the number
reported, I don't believe they had the range, and above all - WHAT?
There was no rebuttal; it was just one of those insane comment interjected during a blizzard of fear being projected about N. Korea. I have seen this
tactic before ...
During one of those blitzes a while back in a ratcheted up concern about Russia interfering in our elections a guest speaker on MSNBC quickly reported
a blatant lie, " several states are reporting that voting machines have been hacked; cyber-forensic evidence concludes it is Russian interference."
It is my opinion that MSNBC has been on a long campaign to create a false fear that Russia has compromised our voting process; I believe all of it,
Russia hacking the DNC, targeting people on social media with fake news, more bs in the Mueller report, etc.,etc.,etc., - it is day in, day out with
first the news and then repeated on Trevor Noah and Stephen Colbert. " Trump is Russia's bitch, Russia is not only interfering with US elections but
elections in the UK and other western countries...
One quick point; Clinton's emails to Podesta (supposedly used against Hillary in support of Trump by the Russians) are the REAL news story.
I have read some of the transcripts of Clinton's supposed "speech" to Goldman-Sachs businessmen. There was NO reporting on corporate news what this
supposed speech really was - I mean is this not what was supposed to hurt Clinton?
It would have if it had been reported on; this is some nasty # - there is no speech by Clinton to an auditorium full of Goldman-Sachs businessmen on
her exploits as Secretary of State...
When you begin to read these transcripts you will quickly realize Goldman-Sachs, part of the world banking monopoly, paid her 400,000 for a
debriefing. From the transcripts you quickly realize it is not an auditorium full of men it is a room with three men and Clinton.
She is clearly subservient to these men; they ask her question after question about the countries she visited as Secretary of State and in particular
the personalities of the leaders of these countries: "does he seem intelligent", "does he have a sense of humor", "how do you think they would react
to a nuclear threat?"
Clinton tries at times to change the topic of the conversation; she tries to talk about the upcoming election and if she should run .. she is
interrupted as they get back on topic.
The discussion is on Iran; Clinton speaks up, "if we bomb several civilian targets it would probably turn the Iranian people against their
government." She is interrupted, " yeah, that worked real well with the Germans bombing London."
I only read a small amount but I downloaded every single transcript, not just the links. If these had been reported on it would have damaged her
character and campaign.
Why is MSNBC and other corporate new agencies trying to push democrats into an anti-Russian pro-war mentality? Do you think, they think, since it is
anti-Trump and discredits his election the democrats watching will be more likely to develop an anti-Russian mentality?
Maybe if it is repeated ten times a show for two years it might sink in ...
What is going on here is simple; this is the Corporatocracy wanting to start a new cold war with a new generation of weapons - there is huge, huge,
money in this.
Will the Russians start this arms race? Obviously not - the Corporatocracy is setting the stage, building public opinion, to start this highly
profitable arms race.
I promise you the republicans will be on board when they make their move on a new arms race.
MSNBC is always working some bull# newscycle in order to fulfill some corporate agenda.
There are two other possible factors this anti-Russian propaganda is working towards; tying Assange to Russia and setting the stage for a questionable
Trump victory in 2020.
One last thing; I don't know what the name is for it but stations like MSNBC (and the democrats), in collusion with the other party and the
Corporatocracy, give the impression to viewers that they are catching and exposing government corruption - the viewer sees that corruption is being
exposed and is relieved that MSNBC (and the democrats) are vigilant and righteous keeping up with and exposing corruption.
There; "feel better" - only all the laws being broken, all the corruption, is only being exposed - nothing is being done about it. What is being done
is only the bar is being lowered and lowered - MSNBC does nothing, has no commentary, editorial or opinion on the root causes of the corruption. There
is nothing (obviously) on the Corporatocracy, the evils of capitalism (as the root cause, or the psychopathy being rewarded at the heights of
power.
These exposes are meaningless; they are worse than meaningless - the corruption has been spoken about, it has been exposed, and guess what - it just
comes out of thin air. We have spoken about it; "FEEL BETTER"
Am I off topic or what?
>>. At the first of this year or first of last; a ticker kept running (15 minutes) at he bottom of the screen on MSNBC - it stated, "Terrorism will no
longer be the top priority of the US military, Russia and China, as America's enemies, are the new priority"
I thought this was a pretty big deal; I waited for there to be a story about the ticker but there was none - the message went away and no one spoke
about it and i never heard another word on what would seem to be a pretty important topic.