Proof Positive? [OOƒO [UFO and Rainbow, same place. same day. Same 30 Seconds] ]

[align=center] I think those Advanced, Hyperdemensional ßΣrothers of ours love playing little jokes with us. Maybe just to intrigue us, or merely make us smile perhaps? Took these earlier today. [10/07/10] Taken within 20-30 seconds of eachother. You can ask me for the actual photo Timestamps if you guys are somewhat doubtful. Understandably so.


*****Here's the -SECOND PHOTO- first. (full cameraPhone zoom - ◄ Taken on an HTC Hero ►) [¿Now you see it!?]*****






******Here's the -FIRST PHOTO-*******





And here's just a link, that might be of some significance. Eh, call it a hunch. It's all good. Enjoy!

Understand Rainbow Bridge (and Getting ready for 2012)[/align]





********************* ps. If ANYBODY is knowledgeable and caring enough, please Embed these. Haven't quite learned how to on this site yet, and don't really have the patience to do so at this time. Thank you
*********************

Hmm, interesting theory. Rainbows definitely are attractable visuals that may intrigue other lifeforms. I looked at the photo and it looks like the the object could be a helicopter though. Have heard of rainbow meditation before but it needs a cloud meditation first as rain is required plus the sun must be at a certain angle.

Hi,

Sorry but I dont see a UFO. I see a smudge. I do not think you have
a UFO there.

I see maybe an error in the picture or camera.

Oh my god, what does it mean? What does it mean? *breaks down crying*

(hehehe, double rainbow...)

lol All interpretations are welcome. If it were a smudge, maybe it would've shown up in the one that was taken but not 30 seconds before that. At the same set of lights. Always speculating.


*edit* Also, to clarify. Those text boxes were only added so this proper photo copyrights and Accreditation won't get yanked out from under me. [Truth be told, all good things will probably get stolen eventually.. no?]

i vote for dust / debris / water droplet on the windscreen of the car

thats why its not there in first pic [ chronologicaly ] but is in the second

the greenlight is irrelevant - you are fabricating links

reply to post by tauschen


If UFOs wanted to associate with rainbows they would pick serious rainbows such as the one that appeared for my birthday back in March 1980 in The Great San Fernando Valley, north of L.A. I turned at an intersection, saw this, stopped my car right in the middle of the street and took some photos of the most awesome natural sight I've ever seen. This, folks, is about as serious as it gets. And if there were any UFOs in the vicinity, they would have posed for my camera! Enjoy.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1da30235142d.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by The Shrike


Quite Enjoyable! That's really cool, that is something. Also, I do think that every tiny detail should ( or must be) taken into consideration when inferring if what the camera picks up (somehow) is the optimum spectrum that the UFO [or as I call them OOƒOs] would be visible in. Consisting of, but not limited to; weather conditions, cloud coverage, planetary (such as the Sun, Earth) positioning, angles from which the pictures taken, etc. etc.. All that good stuff.

For whatever reason, if that makes any sense. Just saying.


Not really trying to relate rainbows with UFO's though, please don't misinterpret that fact at least.

- - - - - - Rainbows are already correlated and slogans for enough groups. Let's leave our cosmico famiglia out of being one of those groups. per favore, si capisce? - - - - - -

reply to post by tauschen


Please post the originals so we can look at them more closely. No one can make a judgement either way otherwise. I doubt anyone is going to 'steal' your photos and make money off them.

IRM

reply to post by tauschen


Tauschen.....

¿Now you see it!?*****

No.....

All I can see is a smudge.....probably a drop of water, or something like that.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

A water droplet would seem likely, it looks like there was a bit of moisture around that day. Also the reason you see it on the one picture and not the other is that it was zoomed in and probably could pick up on the droplet which otherwise could not be seen when zoomed out.
Just a theory.

Ermmmm

A smudge on the windscreen and a rainbow.......

I think you are pushing the boat out a little to far on this one....

Touche. All good replies, and thoughts for sure. The originals aren't too much larger, hence why I didn't post them [not because I'm worried about theft, merely, they hold personal significance]. I believe the camera was set to 1mp instead of 5mp when the photos were taken. Might have, or if it was, most definitely affected the quality of them. Besides, the smudge and droplet can be completely ruled out by the previous data/photos taken moments ago, also with zoom) I believe, there is some serious business underway; But hey, that's what personal interpretations are for.

Believe me(?). I don't want people to care to believe the photos. It honestly, makes no difference to you/us/them whatsoever lol. Merely sharing plausible, empirical evidence.

I was lucky enough to watch it floating there and hovering still for the picture. Which at the same time the object was visible to the camera's eye, it was also apparent to the [my] naked eye (No, I don't have serious eye problems, or any record history of my imagination creating fabricated congnition) . I'm sure the people behind me at the light saw it, [and probably were intrigued stiff lol]
:::
::
:::
"Allow the truth to deluge you, not elude you like so many times before." -KB

Ok.
It looks like a drop of water or smudge to me, but whatever.
What is supposed to be "proof positive of"?
First you post a pic, then you tell a story. How is that different from the eighty billion other accounts of UFO's?
Again, proof of what?

Originally posted by OldDragger
Ok.
It looks like a drop of water or smudge to me, but whatever.
What is supposed to be "proof positive of"?
First you post a pic, then you tell a story. How is that different from the eighty billion other accounts of UFO's?
Again, proof of what?

Well agreed. I completely understand your side of the idea. It's amazing.. (yet, not really so amazing at the same time..) I see exactly where all skeptical perspectives are coming from. And believe me, (100% from the Heart, I was previously a serious skeptic) I wish the windshield wasn't so much a 'factor' to be in decisively drawing a clear definition.. Whatever. I understand. There's jokers, there's dreamers, there's hallucinations, there's people with overly-excited imaginations. However, I do not fall any under of those categories. The only descriptions I could stipulate. [What I saw was too real, for me to comment on.]


: : :: : : : : Believe what you want. Correct me if I'm wrong, "The man that knows he's right, that can prove himself beyond the shadow of a doubt, to be correct.. Needs NO ONE else, to believe him. Because, his Awareness, is expanded, and whole; unlike, those who disbelieve : ::: : : :: :::

Hope I get banned. I'm better off reconnecting, and meditating, merely opening my crown chakra for a millisecond to understand the source. Rather than talking with with [mostly, as I come across on here at least..] border line mongoloids.


.

Hmm, ok, very interesting.

So far it looks like the consensus is in on this one.

Smudge, drop, debris, or a pot o' gold?

Lets move on before someone steals the credit for this one.

Originally posted by noisemedia
Hmm, ok, very interesting.

So far it looks like the consensus is in on this one.

Smudge, drop, debris, or a pot o' gold?

Lets move on before someone steals the credit for this one.

You live in fear, therefore you are damned.

reply to post by tauschen


Tauschen.....

We have no [or VERY....LITTLE] faith in you. I hope you [we? hahahahaha, unliklely] are destroyed. Because... Your lack. of faith. Deserves.. Destruction. with no Remorse.

Who is "we"?

In what do we lack "faith"?

Why do you hope we are "destroyed"?

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by tauschen


I pray for you for thinking a smudge is an alien space craft.

I also pray for you for thinking you could fool the members of ATS with this rubbish.