The Mayan 9 Levels of Consciousness-Entering 9th and Final Cycle Feb 10, 2011

reply to post by Truther101

As much as you loathe admitting to your gramatical mistakes above that makes your statement useless

Again you are very, very wrong. I am a sloppy typist - true.

Here is what I meant to write. Thank you for pointing out my garbled post.

The chart shows life not appearing till well after that point in time. The 'capable' does not mean did.

If I wasted my time pointing out typing, grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes I'd be in violation of ATS rules.

Maybe if you were not so focused on trying to make me a liar, and instead trying to figure if i may have made a mistake, that would have been clear to you. But obviously, that was not the case here.

Misrepresenting the sequence of events here is no different than the efforts of Calleman to misrepresent events.
I gave you multiple chances to fix your mistake and instead you repeated your mistake and went so far as to try and justify your mistake.

The fact is that this is nothing more than shoehorning a misrepresentation by Calleman. The original posted material shows a cellular level and a galactic level, two concepts unknown to the Mayan.

reply to post by stereologist


Once again it will be he said she said non-sense until we have a REAL MAYAN DESCENDANT correct us both on the matter. As i found Calleman's response to those who believe hes a hoax.
Callemans Response

reply to post by Truther101


Your comment has racist written all over it. Why does someone's heritage have any meaning?

As far as Calleman's statement here is the first nitwit statement:

I may be the only one, who is a professional scientist.

He's not an archaeologist. There are no archaeologists that agree with his ridiculous misrepresentations. BTW, Calleman got his degree in biology.

That's about as far as we have to go. Most of what he writes is about other fringe ideas and their failings.

Response to Calleman's Statement

Carl speaks of other people’s fantasies, but he cannot find one single academic Mayanist to support his ideas.

I recommend reading the enter link where it is shown again that Calleman's interpretation of the Maya text is really, really off the mark.

If you read all of it you'll see at the very bottom the following:

Editor's Note: After reading Calleman's first two books twice, my interpretation is that Calleman is an advocate of Intelligent Design whose real agenda is to use the Maya calendar to prove the existence of God.

reply to post by stereologist


Thats not racist at all. its just your interpretation of it. What im saying is all of the scientists and "Mayanists" that study the culture will NEVER be able to have more concrete info than an actual MAYAN DESCENDANT in which would have more INSIDE information passed on from elder to elder, as well as no scientist or person who studies cultures can give you more concrete info on Cuban, Mexican, Chinese, or Hindu culture but the actual PERSON themselves who belong to that culture.

reply to post by Truther101


No. You are a racist. You think that the race of the person, a Mayan in this case, is germane to the issue. That makes you a racist. You're not the first in the 2012 forum to do that.

In the following post we read:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

5 billion years ago during Day 5 of the 1st Cycle Life emerged from the oceans to the shores. but during Day 6(about 4.2 Billion years ago), disasters wiped out 97 percent of life.

My response to these dates where I read the dates off of the time line you provided.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

The solar system is only 4.6 billion years old. The chart begins at 4.5Ba. There is no 5Ba on the chart.
Water condenses into oceans 4.4Ba.

The green stripe for life on Earth fades in around 4Ba.

Your response to the date issue:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

fake and fudge my dates????? So i guess my superb HTML skills allowed me to fake all the links to prove my claims? when you didn't even put one link on your post to claim yours?

Clearly you made no effort to correct your mistake.

I respond to your previous post and make it clear that I took the dates from the evidence you supplied
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Your own links disagree with you. You do realize that the dates I took came from your own links? Probably not, which is why you have composed this clumsy commentary.

Here I am asking why you are so wrong and so obstinate to fix your mistakes.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I've never discussed an issue with someone as frazzled as you are. You make these incredibly odd mistakes and then head off in some irrelevant tangent. That's tingling the wacko meter.

Again I try to get you to realize the mistakes you are making in attempting to support the ridiculous hoaxes of Calleman.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

This is what you wrote:

5 billion years ago during Day 5 of the 1st Cycle Life emerged from the oceans to the shores. but during Day 6(about 4.2 Billion years ago), disasters wiped out 97 percent of life.

You gave the following link to support that statement.

You insist on repeating your mistake instead of fixing your glaring failure.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Maybe if you read properly you'd see that the second part of that section of my post states the following:

but during Day 6(about 4.2 Billion years ago), disasters wiped out 97 percent of life.

You'd be able to read perfectly on the chart it states the following:

Earth heavily bombarded by enormous rocks capable of wiping out life

Finally, in this post I have seen you repeat the mistake so often that I feel that you are purposely telling a falsehood.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here is what you wrote:

5 billion years ago during Day 5 of the 1st Cycle Life emerged from the oceans to the shores. but during Day 6(about 4.2 Billion years ago), disasters wiped out 97 percent of life.

The chart is very, very clear to show that there is no life at 4.2 million years ago.

Your obstinate stance now makes you a liar. When you say that 97% of all life was wiped out you are telling a big fat lie. Your life shows life no appearing till well after that point in time. The 'capable' does not mean did.

So thanks for clarifying the situation. You did look closely at the chart and you chose to lie about the material presented in the chart.

Your response was just that you didn't care about the time line, but rather found some other place where you could copy information and report it to correct your misrepresentation of the timeline.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Which i was able to verify that it wasnt Day 5 and 6 of the 1st cycle, it was day 5 and 6 of the 2nd cycle.

Now to reiterate what i meant to say is the following:

During Day 5 of the SECOND cycle(Approx 300 Million years ago AKA Paleozoic Era) Life emerged from the seas and went ashore. Paleozoic Era

BUT during Day 6 of the SECOND cycle(Approx 251.4 Mya) 97% of all life on earth was wiped out AKA Permian–Triassic extinction event. Permian-Triassic Extinction Event

The posts are evident for everyone to read. They say what they say.

Reminder: November 2nd 2010 begins the 7th day of the 8th wave,

reply to post by this_is_who_we_are


Oh boy there is the chart from Calleman showing the 6 trillion years of time at the cellular level. A bit longer than the age of the universe. Plus the chart mentions 2 concepts unknown to the Maya: cells and galaxies.

Are we there yet?

Has the wave started? Anyone feel anything different?

reply to post by rajaten


I think lots of people will play into the emperor's new clothes and feel this nonexistent wave.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by rajaten

 

I think lots of people will play into the emperor's new clothes and feel this nonexistent wave.

I'm all for this non-existant wave. Just as long as the froth on my cafe latte is the right consistancy.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by rajaten

 

I think lots of people will play into the emperor's new clothes and feel this nonexistent wave.

Ride it stereo! You know you want to!

reply to post by rajaten


Cool video and I watched it because it was 1:28 in length and the slider let me watch the video in under 25 seconds.

That was a great video. Thanks.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by rajaten

 

I think lots of people will play into the emperor's new clothes and feel this nonexistent wave.

Your pets feel the wave. I don't think the emperor's new clothes fit them.
Also, the children probably feel it, too. Assuming they aren't doped up on medication or sugar.

Humanity: the blindest of all species, but it's only temporary.

reply to post by xiphias


And how do you know that pets feel the wave? There are all sorts of anecdotal claims of animals sensing all sorts of things, but no one seems to be able to use this in in a predictive manner. It appears to be all after the fact shoehorning and connecting dots that can't really be connected.

reply to post by Balkan


Well I have had Alien contact, and even here on ATS no one seems to care, so how many must have contact before it is true? Perhaps not 'all' people ever will have personal ET experience.

reply to post by stereologist


How do you know they aren't? Have you tried asking them?

Kidding. But seriously, follow Fido if he takes off running.
Couldn't hurt to trust an animal which isn't blinded by its own intelligence.

reply to post by rajaten


That was beautiful and exciting, I kept waiting for him to eat it. he hung in even though the speed seemed kind of slow from the way the video showed it.

reply to post by xiphias


My dog would be more likely to go off running to smell some other dogs butt or get a treat by ripping off some flesh from road kill than running for shelter in times of peril.