I think i may have stumbled upon Atlantis (new evidence)

reply to post by Vincitori


Perhaps it’s just me being pernickety, but I went down the road of Googling:

Pelenacio Basin

and

1967 Georgeo Oriss Expedition

To my surprise, neither are Googleable?

Pelenacio won’t come up on Google maps, either, or Wikipedia. Nor apparently is there any information about George Oriss.

Am I doing something wrong?

Is my Google broke?

Can you supply a source for these names, please?

reply to post by Skyfloating


Can you give us a link.

Much thanks.

reply to post by Skyfloating


I can understand what you are saying but the point is the member came here with a claim so if your just posting as a member you should be asking for more info on this not discouraging it.

If you don't want to give the info don't post in the first place that's all i am saying.

Thankyou

reply to post by Beamish


Well your google isn't broke because my isn't finding anything on those 2 subjects either.
This thread is awfully suspicious.

Cheers
Brady.

reply to post by mars1

I can understand what you are saying but the point is the member came here with a claim so if your just posting as a member you should be asking for more info on this not discouraging it.

Forgive me if I butt in here, but I agree with Skyfloatingin that if you have a theory of where Atlantis is, then post about it on ATS. That’s what this is all about.

If, however, you have actually found it – even if it is through the intellectual sifting of evidence and not physically – then that ground-breaking information should be available in the public domain as a scholarly achievement where other academics can study your findings and, eventually, assist in actually revealing the physical location of one of the greatest mysteries ever.

What it should not be is a thread on a conspiracy site where the author continues to evade any question about his finds.

One method speaks of a genuine find, the other of a deliberate hoax.

And as the OP continues to evade all questions – and supply “evidence” that is spurious to say the least – then I am placing my money on the second bet.

reply to post by Vincitori


Hey there Vincitori,

I've just sent you a private message go take a look when you get a minute.

Don't be too downcaste by the rough reception ... this is a subject very close to my heart ... reading your OP reminded me that I was just like you 10yrs ago when I first 'discovered' this subject and all that it involves (how time flies when you're having fun).

Put it down to over-enthusiasm ... we've all experienced it at some level or another ... even the ones who pretend to be far too cool and sensible for such things (and if they really have never been 'over-enthused' by anything that's very sad )

Anyhoo, check your messages.

Woody

reply to post by GetRadNZ


Well, “Pelenacio Basin” is now coming up on Google; in links to this thread.

And a Google search for:

“1967 expedition Georgeo Oriss Pelenacio Basin”

also links to this thread and nothing else.

Methinks this is a hoax.

Originally posted by Skyfloating
If people are not ready for truth they wont perceive it even if you wiggle it in front of their nose.

You aren't lying. I recently shared a very big secret (big secret that I had) in a thread about my experience with ufos that shut down nellis afb communications for an entire day, and the post only received 2 damn stars. I'm a credible witness, yet the post got little attention.

Skyfloating,
As for what you suggested about choosing a better medium to disperse such information I can see your point, though you could have worded it a little better. Initially I thought what you were saying is not to talk about it all together, but what it really was was a rhetorical question without a question mark, written as a statement.

I fully understand mods have the right to enjoy their ATS also, and as a human being (you are one, right?) you have the right to share your opinion, too. I understand your concern, and you were extending fair and free advice. The OP seems concerned about it being intellectual property, and even mentions money for what the OP says is priceless. The advice you offered Skyfloating was sane advice and in accordance with the expectations of the legality of intellectual property. What you said was consistent with what the laws are, it just seems the laws didn't ever take into account a mod on ATS having to state the obvious, the obvious being if you want to take credit for something as great as finding Atlantis, you better copyright the work, and present your findings in the right academic and professional circles.

No offense Skyfloating, but it just sounded weird that a mod would be stating the obviousness of what the laws actually mean, even if it seems detrimental to what ATS strives for. Your advice was sound, logical, truthful, and you demonstrated integrity.

10 cool points for Skyfloating for not lying and saying the truth

peace,
ET

reply to post by Vincitori

Originally posted by Vincitori
I found Atlantis.

Sounds interesting.

I really did.

Cool

That is, I didn't find it yet,

Bummer.

but I can find it,

Uh, okay.

because I found out, where it is. Where it has to be.

Umm...

So you really found Atlantis even though you didn't find it yet but you can find it because you found out where it is and where it has to be?

Right. Okay. I say it has to be on Earth. Do I win a prize?

So your research has covered the entire span of Atlantis from its creation to its fall, you've only written one paragraph and you start out with a riddle about how you found it but didn't find it yet can find it? Sounds a bit like a game to me. I would of preferred if you just finished your research and presented it at that time. It would make you more credible especially as a new member. I'm just sayin'...

I'm genuinely interested in Atlantis but your presentation so far is questionable to say the least. A little self control until you have your research together would have given your thread a lot more credence.

reply to post by Beamish


No problem but that's the way ATS is you start a thread you got to back it up there as been many threads on here that go on for pages and pages gets flagged and stared to death with nothing to back the original OP.

If you don't want to share don't bring it to the table my opinion.

Thankyou

reply to post by woodwytch


Hi woodwytch.

Don't be too downcaste by the rough reception…

You’re right; some of us are hard on threads like this.

That’s because the subject matter is also important to us.

Can I suggest that you take note of the couple of posts above that deal with Vincitori’s sole piece of evidence so far, and how specifically named people and places in it are – surprisingly – completely absent from the internet.

Now I know that we cannot have everything on the internet, and that the author of this thread might be dealing with obscure data, but surely something should show?

This Pelenacio Basin, for one. Even if it’s had its name changed and is now something completely different, is it feasible that its old name has disappeared from history completely?

Not one entry on all of the countless billions of pages available?

I'm glad I'm not the only SCHMUCK who googled, scroogled, binged and slapped the search engines for:

obsidian model vessel
Pelenacio Basin
1967 Georgeo Oriss Expedition
Georgeo Oriss
and a hundred other variations with boolean logic handlers!

The OP ignored my serious post that gave him exactly what he asked for.

And more things don't make sense, such as ... Alexander the Great's death being "close" but ALSO the point where the seas (oceans) meet!

And heck, I won't even get started on the rest that doesn't jive the turkey with nothing but a big smirky!

reply to post by Trexter Ziam


Yes, we are schmuckaroonies.

That was probably the intent, to point this out.

reply to post by Vincitori


I found Atlantis too, It was underneath my couch cushion siting next to Jesus, some old chewing gum and 1 dollar and 50 cents in loose change,.
My couch looks like it is 7,000 years old, which would make you research correct in tracing Atlantis back through 7,000 years of history.

P.S. Please don't tell people about my couch, they'll want to see Atlantis, I am trying to film a new "moon landing" video in my garage for NASA and don't want to be disturbed.

Thanks.

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!

Am i right in thinking that he hasnt actually posted anything that could enlighten anyone on where Atlantis is?

mhm

i did but no one's paid attantion...

reply to post by spolvil


Vincitori has supplied us with this, the first paragraph of his masterwork:

The earliest possible creation period of Atlantis is 23,000 BC. Before this, i suspect they were living in the Pelenacio Basin (1967 Georgeo Oriss Expedition). The ancient stone dwellings that where discovered here are arguably 14,000 years more advanced than the earliest found in Europe. We can also deduce, from the un-eroded and rather well kept obsidian model vessel, that the soon to be Atlanteans already had an understanding of magnetism and its uses, and also that by that stage they already had very advanced sea vessels

So far, several of us have tried to find something – anything - corroborative about the information contained in the above sentences.

So far, none have succeeded.

Originally posted by inner warfare
mhm

i did but no one's paid attantion...

I guess I'm "no one" and suspect there are many other "no ones" who actually did read your location post. I even mentioned it in my post above. We hear you!

reply to post by Beamish


Hey there Beamish good to 'read' you,

I completely agree ... the OP was nothing short of pure $h!te in both content and presentation ... reminded me of an excited puppy who'd just found an old bone buried in the backyard and was sure that no other pup had ever found a bone before him !

As for the place on the map that is mentioned I can't say I've ever heard of it and have no idea whether it exists or not ... I do know that I personally have place names / phrases etc that I still have not been able to trace yet (so things like this happen it's not a hanging offence).

I also agree that the OP could quite easily be nought more than a jerk who comes to hoax (this has been known to happen on ATS).

My post on this thread was merely to make him/her aware that I'd sent a u2u (I frequently miss the little box at the top of the page telling me I have a message or ten) ... and my comments about those who have never been 'over-enthused' being sad was aimed at anyone and everyone ... not specifically just on this thread (I'm tempted to say if the cap fits but I know a hardy Celt like yourself would never let your petticoat show by taking such a comment personally ... besides I'm pretty damn sure you've been 'over-enthused' on multiple occasions)

The reason I felt the need to reassure the OP was because a decade ago I was exactly the same ... I thought I had cracked the biggest secret(s) 'ever' ... until I discovered quite a few people had worked out the same things as me ... at first I felt it was an affront to my intelligence (how dare they ... this was my discovery ) ... then I calmed myself and realized that if other people were coming up with the same ideas as me them maybe ... just maybe ... I wasn't such a weirdo after all !

Nowadays, many of the things I theorized back then have been proven ... this makes me confident that there is absolutely no reason why my other hypotheses should not be proven to be correct at some future point.

With that in mind ... by the time this reaches the thread the OP may be a proven hoaxer ... or maybe he's just really bad at opening posts and letting his enthusiasm get the better of him (an excited puppy with a newly unearthed bone).

Woody

I should probably say that I personally do not subscribe to the usual theory that Atlantis was a lost continent / island that was submerged beneath the waves during the deluge. I personally believe that the word 'Atlantis' is wrongly assumed to describe a singular location ... personally I think it was originally the word that described a set of at least 3 locations that had original links (but that's another story entirely)