Paranormal activity caught on security camera.

reply to post by Human_Alien


well dont you think thats at least a bit creepy... btw the camera isnt high..

Bug on Camera lens

Originally posted by MrAtomicspace
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

well dont you think thats at least a bit creepy... btw the camera isnt high..

How come the time stamp on the video is set on 00/00/0000 00:00:00 AM??
Now THAT'S even creepier (not to mention, highly suspicious too)

reply to post by SLAYER69


I didnt tell you that Im an aerospace engineering undergrad. Im sorry to say that the video you linked is not related, I can personally tell that that was something on the surface of the lens. In my case it is clear that the object is in the distance because you can tell that is on the shaded part of the road, plus many other details, like movement characteristics etc.

edit.

it also changes shade strength... how can that be explained?

reply to post by Human_Alien


because it was an replay of the actuall recording, please read comments above. the real time and date are on the program itself.

reply to post by badw0lf
hey, everybody can't be Phage, but then again everyone can't be the sausage king either.

this video just doesn't seem that gripping to me, there's nothing here to even analyze really it's a disappearing shadow, that's all.

reply to post by MrAtomicspace


I read every single comment and nowhere did I read anything about the time-stamp being set at zero. We did you call-out one of my posts? I didn't insult you at all.

reply to post by SLAYER69
for some reason the way the shadow disappears just screams cgi to me, but then again we are watching a copy of a copy of a copy, maybe a 1st gen film would show something else.

reply to post by Human_Alien


Im sorry I didn't try to insult you. I meant that in the above comments i meantioned it was a replay, therefore the time stap was 00/00/0000

reply to post by abe froman


Btw those people are not capable of video editing on such high levels, i dont know how to prove it other than analyzing details and behaviour of the shadow...

reply to post by MrAtomicspace
you can achieve that effect with any number of software programs, grade school students do amazing things with adobe after effects all the time, it's hardly more complicated than fingerpaints or water colors.

A little lazy in doing this but I thought I would add something to the mix here

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f577e0b8cfe4.jpg[/atsimg]
18seconds

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/848622f39356.jpg[/atsimg]
22seconds

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a399ff6c1302.jpg[/atsimg]
26seconds

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/2b25daed8ccf.jpg[/atsimg]
29seconds

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f6559b43b8ce.jpg[/atsimg]
36seconds

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5b2db8cbcf0a.jpg[/atsimg]
43seconds

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/af64510d6591.jpg[/atsimg]
72seconds

reply to post by abe froman


I understand your point, but its not an strong argument. You can tell from the video that that is not the case. I can send you the actual video which was given to me as a mp4 format, and you can analyze it if you like. But I am 110% sure that that isnt the case, also taking into consideration where it came from.

reply to post by ATSmediaPRO


Im not sure whether you are supporting it or showing something else?

edit.

Also theres a part when it just lands after jumping from the corner, and you can tell the shadow at the street, where before that it was lighted.

reply to post by MrAtomicspace


Meh, I just took stills of when the shadow moves at certain times. It's really hard to tell anything it's a video of a video that's compressed twice....

reply to post by ATSmediaPRO


Would you also like to analyze the the version given to me, its very clear.

I've seen videos like this before, caused by an insect either on the lens or, more likely, on the inside of the camera housing. Since this is an outdoor camera I'm sure there is a dome or box housing protecting the camera. An insect inside the housing and flying from the housing lens to the camera lens will create an impressive growth/morph effect...conversely, when it flies back to the inside of the housing the shadow would become much smaller and change shape.

The "Bug on lens" video shown above looks different because they're using an IR illuminator, common for night cameras; the IR is highly reflected off the bug, overexposing it in the camera's CCD sensor.

reply to post by avocadoshag


Again... That is not the case. 1 strong reason among others is that the shadow is 3D and it follows a perticular path, and it also changes shade strength while it is stationary at the centre.

Please before posting analyze details.
This is a very serious case and I learned that it is being investigated.

Originally posted by MrAtomicspace
reply to post by avocadoshag

 

Again... That is not the case. 1 strong reason among others is that the shadow is 3D and it follows a perticular path, and it also changes shade strength while it is stationary at the centre.

Please before posting analyze details.
This is a very serious case and I learned that it is being investigated.

edit on 5-10-2010 by MrAtomicspace because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-10-2010 by MrAtomicspace because: (no reason given)

Please before posting read my post: I've seen this sort of thing many times before. In my line of work I'm exposed to images like this on a regular basis...the first time I saw one I was quite rattled, until I opened the camera dome and found a bug inside. Many species of insects like to climb inside electronic housings; the warmth seems to attract them.

You say "that is not the case"...yet I didn't read anything saying that you'd checked inside the camera housing. So how can you be so sure?