posted on Oct, 5 2010 @ 09:24 AM
reply to post by Hatcookie
I agree. What happened in Haiti is inexcusable. GovCorp sent soldiers there to 'protect' them, and denied many relief deliveries. I read an article
back then about 10,000 UK soldiers arriving with 'relief deliveries'. But the relief delivery was just enough to sustain 10,000 soldiers for 90
days. It was a PR spin. There were hundreds of places that helicopters could have landed, yet airspace was controlled by us. Many elites were backing
the concept that Haiti would be the 'Taiwan' of the east. They wanted sweat shops, tourism, and every means to extract and exploit their natural
resources. It would create jobs, but only in the facet that all the money loaned to them to rebuild and grow as a nation, are all IMF scams to create
debt that cannot be repaid. And while they are depleting Haitian resources, the other entities are insuring that the economy slowly caves in. Once
Haiti declares insolvency, the elites can sieze the rest of their resources as 'repayment to old loans', while at the same time lending them MORE
money so they can pay their bills. At that point, Haiti will be 3rd world again, but this time they will have no resources, but there will be military
bases there to protect military strategies.
It's just another ugly face of Disaster Capitalism. I would suggest watching Zeitgeist Addendum in the section that covers "Confessions of an
Economic Hitman'. Collapsing economies has been a geopolitical tool used by the CIA for decades.