Ancient human skulls and bones

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Then this is probably a damn good clue to follow. Fool everyone about climate is down the drain, lets go genetic now that we know that the Neanderthal got older than us. Probably

Excuse my impudence but you are doing a better job of parroting what you've read than answering those who are questioning your conclusions.

You never did address the rebuttal of Gavin that I posted here...

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
We have however found modern human footprints in the same layer of clay as dinosaurs (if you disagree, proove it).

You're kidding, right?

Nothing like turning logic on its head

I missed this post from the OP. Obviously I should not have even bothered posting here in the first place.

... But seeing I am here ...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c79762b8d646.jpg[/atsimg]

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
In all life we know of, cells die withing a relatively short time from them being created from cell division. Every cell your own genome produce proteins to govern processes including reproducing every cell in your body within seven - 7 - years. Now what does that tell you about how old a bonehead would be when it died? Nothing. Ageing of bones and fossils is done by measuring the bones with bloody straightedges and the coroner's gut.

No, not the coroners gut. Many measurements are made as well as looking at the teeth, cranial suture lines, Pubic os size, femur length, ect. ect, ect, to determine skeletal age. This is forensic anthropology and is used even today in crime labs. There is no reason to believe that this method that has been highly successful in dating modern skeletons would not be so in dating fossilized remains. Once again you have not one iota of evidence to support your wild beliefs.

These "ancient humans' bones" does look old as in worn out or very solid. God gave us a disease about 5000 years ago, which helped us with the problem that all of us grew into becoming "neanderthals". These bones are old, in all extents of the word.

So God gave us a disease that made us Neandertals . Where is your source for that info???

and...

I just gave you sources to show that we are not descended form Neandertals. I can present numberous more if need be.

Just to chime in and say that the Paluxy tracks were a hoax. In fact, the human "footprints" are not even there anymore. I went dove hunting out there about 12 or 13 years ago and the landowner showed us where they used to be. The mortar that the guy used to make the "footprints" has been washed away by the river.

Oh, and the 120 years of Gen.6 has been grossly misinterpreted. Check out Gen. 25:7

"And these are the days of the years of Abraham's life that he lived: one hundred years and seventy years and five years."

J.

Hey look, I ducked out for a few days and found that my detailed reply hadn't even been addressed. It seems that I'm either making a very valid and hard to refute point or an entirely insane one that is incomprehensible to the opponents of my views.

Either way, it seems I did a good job, it's hard to be that incoherent.

reply to post by J-in-TX


Well, naturally they were. They were excavated beneath tons of rocks and gravel and mud, they were set in clay, and clay relese it's imprints when water comes in. Not vald argument. Dove hunting or not. Did you get any?

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Then this is probably a damn good clue to follow. Fool everyone about climate is down the drain, lets go genetic now that we know that the Neanderthal got older than us. Probably

Excuse my impudence but you are doing a better job of parroting what you've read than answering those who are questioning your conclusions.
You never did address the rebuttal of Gavin that I posted here...

So, Neo Christian Mystic, my apologies...not only does my comment on Gavin apply to a different thread that we are fencing on...it should have been directed to "theregonnakillme". It's ok to butt heads on a subject, but I suppose it's appropriate to to keep one's adversaries straight.

Gavin is still hooey, though.

reply to post by JohnnyCanuck


It's always easy to kick a dying horse. But all his work was valid, until some locals destroyed the find and suddenly got rich. Sad story to show how anyone can be a villain. Which we already knew.... Anyways.........

reply to post by snusfanatic


Read the book Dead Man's Secrets
www.world-mysteries.com...

Just one author of many to cover things that should not exist, such as ancient human footprints and jewelry embedded in coal.

reply to post by Neo Christian Mystic


Please see the Hall of Maat thread that Byrd and I suggested. It provides a pretty good take on Gavin.

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Compare a modern child's skull with that of a grown man and that of an elderly man, then add 900 years to the evolution of our bones, and you might have a neanderthal or similar.

What grows is the bone under the eyebrows, the frontal lobes are less important and memory cortex (back of the scull) becomes more important. These guys are old humans. And they were blonde (close to grey and white) and their eyes grew blueish (just like they are in newborns all over the world). These guys (neanderthals) are our original makeup, "we who grew old", and "you" are us, limited to 120 years lifespan, missing grandpah.

I am blonde, white and blue-eyed, and I have fur on my thighs, no hair on my chest, but great beard. What does that make me? Pie Ieso damnit. We're, well atleast me, we are surviving atill.

Meaning, the giants were furry. Oyr heartlovers were skinned

S=A
U=Y

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
Compare a modern child's skull with that of a grown man and that of an elderly man, then add 900 years to the evolution of our bones, and you might have a neanderthal or similar.

What grows is the bone under the eyebrows, the frontal lobes are less important and memory cortex (back of the scull) becomes more important. These guys are old humans. And they were blonde (close to grey and white) and their eyes grew blueish (just like they are in newborns all over the world). These guys (neanderthals) are our original makeup, "we who grew old", and "you" are us, limited to 120 years lifespan, missing grandpah.

Evidence???

I showed you mine, now show me yours

reply to post by kokoro


Neanderthals were blueeyed and blonde, that's a fact, Me give you proof? It is the proof. We have found them such. Homo Sapiens Sapiens is black skinned. We are the only species who is disrupted, and we have no subspecies. Get on. Apes are whiteskinned and the only places they have no furr is in their arses and in their face. Now, we have only furr where we are lost in test, in our arses and in our faces. Get over it. We are not evolved apes, the apes are degenerated homo sapiens sapiens. Time my friend. They laugh at us. And you? Welll they laugh of you too......

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by kokoro

 

Neanderthals were blueeyed and blonde, that's a fact, Me give you proof? It is the proof

Please...cite your sources.

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by kokoro

 

Neanderthals were blueeyed and blonde, that's a fact, Me give you proof? It is the proof

even if they were blue eyed what does that prove exactly?? We were talking about wether they lived to 1000 years old, eye color has nothing to do with it. And I gave you all kinds of evidence that you have not even bothered to touch on, and so did maddenssinmysoul. Im not sure you understand this so im gonna say it one more time:

YOU STATING SOMETHING DOES NOT EQUAL PROOF.

You, sir are grasping at straws.

reply to post by JohnnyCanuck


Google "neanderthal blonde" I am not here to make you wiser, you should have this knowledge....

It has been shown that the Neanderthals, unlike "us" who were black skinned and had brown eyes. Neanderthals were blueeyed and blonde, had white skin (like the Chimps) and we learned quickly, and we ran away. FGS Frekk this

reply to post by Neo Christian Mystic


No the print he is talking about is a human footprint that has a dino. print crossing it showing that the dino and man have been in the same spot in as little time (the dino may have had human for dinner lol)

I have seen the print and others i keep a log on my external drive if you really wish to see just u2u me ill dig it up (may take a little time).

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck

 

Google "neanderthal blonde" I am not here to make you wiser, you should have this knowledge....

Given that this is your thread, you have taken it upon yourself to 'make us wiser'. If you make such a statement, you should be prepared to support it. If I make a statement, I am prepared to produce citations from a peer-reviewed source. That way folks know that my data is not rectally sourced.

Edit to say...

"In Neanderthals, there was probably the whole range of hair colour we see today in modern European populations, from dark to blond right through to red," Dr Lalueza-Fox told the BBC News website. news.bbc.co.uk...

...which is different from stating that all neanderthal had blond hair and blue eyes!

Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic

Google "neanderthal blonde" I am not here to make you wiser, you should have this knowledge....

It has been shown that the Neanderthals, unlike "us" who were black skinned and had brown eyes. Neanderthals were blueeyed and blonde, had white skin (like the Chimps) and we learned quickly, and we ran away. FGS Frekk this

edit on 5/10/2010 by Neo Christian Mystic because: Dead horse

Again, who F-ing cares what color they were, or thier eyes. I gave you links showing they are not a significant contributor to our DNA. Meaning, they died out. You are making more points that you are showing no eveidence for. And dont tell me to google anything, you started the thread so the least you can do is back it up with some evidence or dont bother starting threads. Im niether lazy nor stupid and that is why i posted links to support my assertions. You have dont nothing but state opinion.