Spinning UFO with Close UP in Russia Aug 2010

This is quite a nice little video. The zoom in is quite clear as far as UFO's go.

Judge for yourself.

Welp, its a youtube video of a ufo.

personally, I found the ufo's on the movie, independence day, far cooler.


oh...we are supposed to take it seriously? ok, then, well lets see...who took the original footage? anyone credible? has the raw footage been looked at?

nevermind...oh well.

cool video anyhow...but until the source and footage is analysed, it is meaningless beyond cg trickery...also, since it was in a city and the size of a damned football field, it would be nice to have different camera angles from other people filming it on their cell phones and other things...I mean..its a city...surely more than one person filmed this.

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


L1U2C3I4F5E6R.....

CGI

Next.....!

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

I particularly liked how until it left it generally stayed in the gap between the two buildings almost as if it knew it was being filmed from where the camera guy was. Oh, I scoff, but they're probably alien spacemen, and I'm the fool after all.

reply to post by SaturnFX


Your points are all valid of course, however, when it comes to UFO's there are NO credible witnesses.

Most UFO pics are blurry as too are the videos that accompany them. But on the other hand, if someone gets a clear pics or video every says its too good to be true. No winners here.

Not everybody is lying.

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


You're correct, not everybody is lying, most of the time they just don't know what they saw.

Having said that, whoever made this video, is lying.

It doesn't look real to me. In the wide angle shot it looks much more blurry than the surrounding items and suspiciously clear in the enhancement. It's movement behind the tree seems odd to me. The enhanced pictures sky color is different which I may accept but the building being black is especially suspicious to me. Looks like a fail to me.

Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
reply to post by SaturnFX

 

Most UFO pics are blurry as too are the videos that accompany them. But on the other hand, if someone gets a clear pics or video every says its too good to be true. No winners here.

Not everybody is lying.

Couldn't agree with you more but I don't see this one as real.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

 

You're correct, not everybody is lying, most of the time they just don't know what they saw.

Having said that, whoever made this video, is lying.

Ouch!

But true.

The main thing that comes to mind for me is not the blatantly obvious CG "craft", It is the movement of the camera. When someone is zoomed right in close to an object, their slight hand movements are amplified to create a shaky picture. this was not a high zoom factor so why was the camera following an almost "figure of 8" path while tracking a (mainly) stationary object. Was this guy in a mosh pit or what?

Then in the zoom at 5x and 10x speed, bearing in mind the massive movement in the camera in the normal speed footage, they somehow managed to edit it in such a way that the "Craft stayed exactly dead centre in frame while the tree to the right and building to the left are almost perfectly vertical.

I'm a believer but its videos like this that cause people to ridicule us and label ufology a pseudo-science.

Nice find though, even if it does only highlight the obstacles we face here.

As cartoons go I would prefer to watch Roadrunner and Wile Coyote

They don't spin so this must be disinformation.
The crew would not feel gs or they would not survive 90 turns.
Spinning has been observed in an envelope of light around a craft.
Who knows what this dark rain cloud light comes from.
Looks like the anti Tesla agents have their job cut out debunking this one.

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


Well at least we don't have to worry about anyone saying this is too good to be true. Obvious CG

Well done OP for the video, it's always nice that someone brings them to the forum, sadly on this occasion it's a cut and dried case of cgi,

Reasons...

Something that big would have been seen.
For ease of animation it's being moved along a spline path so it goes easily left and right.
As said it appears to be playing hide and seek with the cameraman, I para quote Will Smiths character in Independence Day "I don't think they flew 90 billion miles to play hide and seek"

Btw, your avatar gives me the creeps, I keep waiting for a possessed face to jump out of the screen

Mind you, this LCD screen tends to be dark so it may be just me

Originally posted by L1U2C3I4F5E6R
Not everybody is lying.

True, but simply put, if the source is questionable, and the technology exists for any jokester in the world to toss something together, then you do have to simply conclude it is not evidence.
If something can be suspect of corruption, then it should be seen as corrupted. If there was many different people coming out viewing this at different angles, sure...then a discussion and breakdown can occur.


As someone also pointed out...these disks don't rotate. Well, not sure how someone would say how a unproven craft would work..but, I will say out of the people whom did try to discuss the logistics of flying saucers in a theoretical sense...the circular feature comes from a sort of centerfuge to spin charge metal fluids for purposes of gravity manipulation...etc etc etc...all hypothesis of course.

Anyhow, next time you see something of this nature on youtube...check the source before posting..check to see if there is at least any other videos of the same object at different angles, etc.

Is anyone still seriously debating this?

I enjoyed the video but this just screams hoax so loudly I cant hear anything else.

Everything from camera angle, movement of the "craft", the spinning, the oh so steady camera work, and of course the "enhancement"shot just reek of yet another CG animation.

Then again, maybe Im wrong and "they" just want us to think its a hoax. Right? Yeah thats it.

Still, it's a cool video.

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
They don't spin so this must be disinformation.
The crew would not feel gs or they would not survive 90 turns.
Spinning has been observed in an envelope of light around a craft.
Who knows what this dark rain cloud light comes from.
Looks like the anti Tesla agents have their job cut out debunking this one.

Can I get some of that stuff you are smoking?

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R

 

L1U2C3I4F5E6R.....

CGI

Next.....!

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

I think if I were to take a video camera, walk up to a UFO that had landed, knock on its door to the point where you'd acually hear the knocks,.. you would STLL claim it to be CGI, but with sound effects.

Videos like this, and the 1997 Mexico city UFO video are always ruled as fakes just because they are too good to be true. Fact is, if this were real, no one would know because we have no point of reference to compare it too. NOW, if the Mexico city UFO was a KNOWN real UFO video, and you compared it to this video, you might be more enclined to claim this one as real too, instead of CGI. Cause to me, they are VERY similar.

reply to post by L1U2C3I4F5E6R


This is an old video from 2007 known as UFO near Moscow I think already discussed here.
The original recorded by a guy named Angel generated several copies as usual but here is
the original from June 2007 with original audio.

Was gonna say "GET OF THE zoom" but changed my mind...LOL

Maybe less drink next time...Drunk crackpot...