Royal Society and Disclosure

I just wanted to start this thread to share my views on the Royal Society presentation on the 4th October 2010 titled 'Towards a scientific and societal agenda on extra-terrestrial life' and the endless talk about this being part of 'disclosure'.

By the 5th October 2010 I don't think we will be any closer to 'disclosure' on flying saucers than we have been since Kenneth Arnold sighting in 1947! Frankly I am sick of seeing the word 'disclosure' on ATS. I don't think some people actually know what this word means.

If you read the Royal Society website details about the event you will find the following statement which can be found in its original form here..

Should extra-terrestrial life exist, upcoming efforts will provide living generations with a realistic chance of its detection.

The key word here is SHOULD but you should read and take in the full meaning of the rest of that sentence! They are not disclosing extraterrestrial life they are merely saying that should it exist they are working on ways of making the detection of it possible. There is no hidden meaning!

Or is everyone just reading into this what they want to read????

The Royal Society are not in the business of making speculation and hearsay with no scientific proof or basis into fact! Here's a quote from the about us section of their website:

The Royal Society is a Fellowship of the world's most eminent scientists and is the oldest scientific academy in continuous existence. We aim to expand the frontiers of knowledge by championing the development and use of science, mathematics, engineering and medicine for the benefit of humanity and the good of the planet.

Rant over

My friend, disclosure on extraterrestrials is one thing that I have to give TPTB very much credit on. Telling the global population that intelligent extraterrestrials exist isn't an easy thing to do. While so many people parade and protest on how governments "cover up" information, on the same token it'd be a hysteria like never seen before if the government simply came out and said "yes, they're here". The route to telling the global population that intelligent extraterrestrials exist must be taken slowly and gradually. That is why in the past two years small events concerning the topic have been popping up in mainstream news networks and religious organizations. Of course they say they're only concerned with microbes and other simple lifeforms, this is only progress on the road to eventually unearthing to the world that intelligent life forms exist.

Just my two cents.

I think this should get more attention.
I'm doing my part...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I, for one, never supposed that the Royal Society was poised to provide disclosure about UFOs on October 4th and 5th. This conference, their second on the topic of extraterrestrial life this year, simply seems interesting as a part of a larger pattern. All the parts of this pattern have to do with different implications of the existence of extraterrestrial life. Some of these have been discussed in these forums, others, it appears, have not. Taken together, they raise some interesting questions. Why has the topic of extraterrestrial life become so prominent at this particular time? A flurry of interest around some one particular event, such as a major UFO sighting is understandable. What does seem different recently, is the number, variety, frequency, and seeming significance of 'extraterrestrial events'. I don't think it extravagant to consider the possibility that 'something is up', that some change is due in the status quo. What form such a change might take, no on can say with certainty. Let us consider what is known about the UFO phenomenon and how information about it has been 'conserved' in certain quarters, and what we can reasonably surmise about life in the universe. A very gradual process of familiarization with the the existence of such life, in the vicinity of Earth, followed by an explicit exposition of this as fact, is not an unreasonable possibility, based on both observation and reason. World governments may wish to cooperate in this process, assuming they are aware that it is occurring, and realizing that they are powerless to prevent it. They might well disclose what they have learned of Earth's true situation in the larger universe, and have thus far kept largely to themselves. In so doing they could 'soften the impact' and reduce negative reactions and chaos. And that would be very much in their interests, as well as that of their citizens. Ross