posted on Oct, 2 2010 @ 01:45 AM
If the major media (the public relations department of the government) is supporting their testimony by airing it, rather than trying to smear it with
propaganda and limited access and editing, then there must be something awry here, in my opinion.
Like net neutrality. Everyone loves it. But so does Obama. And Bush. And congress. The government as an entity is wholely supporting and trying its
best to push forward net neutrality. If the state wants it done, there's a HUGE red flag there.
My guess is that the alien intervention proposition is an attempt at deception, whose goal is to eliminate the growing fear of nuclear annihilation in
order to make people into more productive tax livestock.
My guess is that people are seeing the reality of war and slavery, of destruction and of monolithic weaponry. People are realizing that, not only do
nukes carry the capability to destroy the world [cite the cold war attitude of 1950's], but nowadays people are also realizing that the ones who have
their hands on the buttons are the most immoral, unwise, greedy, and impulsive people on the planet. 2 + 2 = 4, weapons of mass destruction + a
toddler at the button = oh crap.
But here we have an idea which disarms the fear of annihilation. Alien intervention. Now people can believe that aliens are benevolently shielding the
button from the hand of the toddler. You should be honest, if not with everyone else, at least with yourself - would you rather believe that the
toddler has full control over the nuke button, or would you rather believe that aliens are preventing the toddler from having a temper tantrum? Be
honest - the more desireable thing to believe is the more comfortable thing.
But men of rationality don't believe only what is most comfortable for them to believe - they ask tough questions, because knowing the truth about
reality is more beneficial than holding onto a fantasy for comfort and the illusion of safety.
If the alien intervention proposition is true, and you act as if it is not true, then you would be actively participating in taking responsibility for
man's actions - actually trying to fix the problem yourself - and still nothing bad would happen even if you fail, because the aliens would prevent
it.
But... if the alien intervention proposition is false, and you act as if it is true, then where are you? You would be at a point where the toddler
indeed does have full control over the nuke button, but you wouldn't care because you would think that aliens are going to save you from the toddler.
This is the most dangerous position to be in, therefore you should carefully evaluate whether or not you believe the toddler can push the button.
Furthermore, if benevolent aliens are stopping us from annihilating ourselves, then why aren't they doing anything about slavery, murder, genocide?
There is not one case of aliens overthrowing a dictatorship, there is not one case of aliens flying down from the sky with relief food for starving
africans, there is not one case of aliens teleporting soldiers off the battle field to random points in the world to break up wars.
In fact, the action of saving the world despite all the wars and genocide occurring is simply an act of perpetuating the genocide. If the wars could
not continue due to nuclear annihilation, then preventing nuclear annihilation would guarantee that the wars will continue. Are the aliens really
benevolent if they force us to survive when we're clearly doomed to annihilate ourselves? Are the aliens really loving if they stop the nukes from
flying but still allow humans to murder each other in every single way other than nukes?
Take a moment and critically think about this.