Whether or not you believe there will be some type of world changing event in 2012, you government definately does, so they're taking action (on their
behalf, not yours) and you are writing the check.
Let me explain. In this post I won't debate the existence of underground bases and other facilities we know exist and are being employed on a large
scale. I'll give a very brief overview, then focus on how they're paying for it, how they cover the expenditures and a few other things that should
give you pause.
There are two leading theories about the events that may unfold around 2012. One concerns the fact that the earth will cross the galactic plane,
encountering gravitational disturbances and the other around Nibiru, or Planet X. Planet X, despite NASA's denials, was named by.......NASA. Without
beating a dead horse, it was detected in the late 70's (orbital perterbences of the outer planets) and NASA sent the IRAS satellites to investigate,
then announced to the world in '83 they had found a body perhaps several times the size of Jupiter. Shortly thereafter, came denials. Saucer? What
Saucer? It's a weather balloon. Actual Encounters with Planet X and it's orbit are mentioned by the Egyptians, Sumerians, Minoans, Hindu. Chinese, and
virtually every other culture that has texts going back 3600 years. Tree ring and Ice core data suggest flooding and dramatically increased volcanic
and geophysical activity in regular 3600 year intervals.
As for an encounter with the galactic plane, simple astronomical observations confirm this, and again, it's documented by every ancient culture. Why
would we ignore their word, when they've been proven accurate about the rest of the contents of their historical texts?
Your government is responding by building a number of not so secretive underground bases, where we can logically deduce they'll run and hide when the
conditions warrent.
Evidence? Let's focus now on how that's being paid for. You no doubt have fond memories of the tarp and stimulus bills, between which the governmnet
allotted about 1.2 trillion dollars. Thats one-thousand two-hunderd, thousand million dollars. Again, one-thousand two-hunderd thousand million
dollars. In other words, enough money to buy all American tax-payers a new car. By logic, if you took that amount of money and distributed it equally
among tax paying Americans, those behind on their mortgage would have caught up with plenty to spare, those with credit card debt would have become
debt free, and those with no debt could have bought a new car, or boat, or remodeled their house, obviously ending any hint of a recession in short
order. There's no question that would have worked quite well, though it would have created the same amount of foreign debt and devaluation of the
dollar.
Instead, the tarp was used to buy prefered stock in banks. That's right. They gave it to the banks (by force, as some didn't want it) so they could
loan us our own money. But it wasn't loaned out, because nobody wants to add debt right now (except our government). Let me translate what you should
be reading into this. Government prints money to give to banks, which they pay right back. The money then goes into a government account, with which
they put on deposit with the fed, and then becomes untraceable. In other words, they created a giant slush fund for themselves.
As for the stimulus (or "infrastructure spending"). Less than ten percent went into infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.), In fact, most of the money
hasn't been spent and now rests in a government account (say goodbye).
Obviously, the question you should be asking is "Why"?
But wait, there's more. The war costs us about $120 billion per year, at least that's what they "appropriate" for it. That's for about 140,000 troops
at any given time. Lets do some math. That's about $857,000 per troop.
How about this. I take a troop, fly him over not on a transport, but first class ($3000 or so), Then, instead of feeding him MRE's at a few bucks
apeice, lets give him a steak at say....Applebees 3 times a day ($75). And instead of a barracks or tent, lets put him up in a four star at $200 per
day. And just for added comfort, his own new Range Rover ($50K). He'll need weapons and gear. What about a new AR, vest, chrome-plate 45 and 2000
rounds (call it $3000). Uniforms. Nah, instead ten Brooks Brothers suits. ($12,000). In fact, lets add a 42-inch plasma, I-phone, gps, laptop and a
digital camera to film it all ($3500). While we're at it.....Let's pay him a six-figure salary and give him a gym membership. $103,000. Now let's
total up. That makes $274,875. I support our troops, and they really have nothing to do with this mess, but are you beginning to see a pattern?
I know, planes are expensive and so's the fuel. Bet we already had them, and if they weren't flying there, they'd be flying somewhere else, so it's a
non factor.
So what are they planning to do with all that money?
Now, lets look at a few more interesting things. Let's look at the B-52. I'm 50, and many of the B-52's that fly over my head everyday are older than
I am. They've been through more than a few wars and flown more days than not, and there are no plans to retire them. But the space shuttles, which we
spent billions of dollars to develop and maintain, are due to retire this year? Huh?
The main argument is safety. Again, I refer you to the B-52. It's a given that strapping to a rocket booster and blasting out of the atmosphere is a
bit more stressful on the hardware, but who believes we cant overhaul and refit as we do with 50-year old bombers that have been flown 180,000 times?
It just isn't plausible.
If it's the potential loss of life, remember, we're the same country that sent out B-17's knowing most of the crews would be lost over the course of a
tour. Our people are brave and not afraid of risk, and our government really isn't that concerned over the off chance of losing a few astronauts.
One thing retiring the flights does do is remove the "human" element from the equation. In other words, witnesses. Now consider the host of new "solar
telescopes" being launched in rapid succession from a span of nations. These take twenty years to plan and implement. This decision wasn't made last
week.
Space station? Does anyone really believe it's value goes beyond observation? The claim is that we conduct "experiments" aboard the space station. How
practical and viable is that? Let me explain. I'm sure it is just plain fun for a scientist to mix chemicals and prod rats in a gravity-free
environment, but what does it actually accomplish. There may be some mild benefits or new observations about things we can do in a gravity free
environment, but simply put, here on earth.....where we live.....we have gravity. Should we discover a new manufacturing application for a gravity
free environment, there remains the problem that we can't build a factory to implement it in space. In other words, it doesn't do us much good.
Is it also a coincidence that by executive order posse comatodus (excuse spelling, but don't have time to check) has been rendered moot, and plans
exist to train and post 400,000 troops in our communities to combat "civil unrest."
I would submit to you that the stimules, the tarp and much of the spending that vaulted us to this "stellar" level of debt ( which there seems to be
no concern about repaying) are and we're means to create funds for purposes being kept secret from the American people. I would suspect this garnering
of resources had a purpose, because the economics behind it wouldn't make sense to a six-year old. I'd appreciate your efforts in pointing out other
evidence of this. Is our government revealing anything via recent decisions and planning?
One last nagging question. Why did Kennedy insist we develop the capability of going to the moon in less than a decade?
www.youtube.com...
edit on 27-9-2010 by astrogolf because: Added an interesting video.
edit on 27-9-2010 by astrogolf because: Added an interesting video.