UFO-Nukes Press Conference: Sept 27, MSM Anticipating

And they keep coming and coming.

New vid.

www.youtube.com...

Its also now posted on Popsci.com

www.popsci.com...

The truth is out there, and yesterday a group of retired Air Force officers gathered the media and a handful of well-wishers at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., in an attempt to reveal what they say is a government cover-up of decades of alien contact. The officers claimed, through their own individual accounts, that during the Cold War UFOs visited various USAF installations, but that’s just the precursor to a more remarkable assertion: the aliens were tampering with our nukes.

Gathered by well-known UFO researcher Rober Hastings, the officers all individually gave similar accounts – that sometime between 1963 and 1980 each was present at nuclear missile sites when unexplained flashing lights appeared in the sky at the same time the missiles went form alert status to non-responsive.

In one account, retired targeting officer Robert Jamison said all 10 missiles in his charge – known as a “flight” – went off alert status just as rumors of unidentified lights in the sky overhead swept through the base. Jamison didn’t see the UFO himself, but several others on the base witnessed the incident. The cause of his missiles going offline is unknown.

Of course, as Danger Room points out it would be tempting to blame an entire flight of nuclear warheads malfunctioning on unexplained phenomena rather than a far more explicable kind of occurrence known as human (or perhaps computer) error. But the fact that all of the officers – whose accounts took place at different times and installations – told similar stories with similar outcomes was a compelling enough narrative for the journalists on hand for the event.

Hastings and the officers don’t think their aliens are hostile in nature, but rather that they aimed to show humankind the error of its ways and how close it was to destroying itself during that period in history. And Hastings, for his part, thinks these kinds of incidents could be ongoing but the public just doesn’t know about them. Present along with the Air Force officers were a bevy of declassified documents depicting odd aerial phenomena recorded by the U.S. government over the years.

But what Hastings and the officers really want, they said, is the truth, like the details of Project Blue Book, an Air Force investigation running from 1947 to 1969 in which some 12,618 sighting were recored, 701 of which remain “unidentified.” According to Hastings and company, the government knows what’s going on and has been keeping it under wraps for decades.

"The American people have a right to know the facts," Hastings told reporters. "This is a national security issues but it is (also) a need-to-know issue, a right-to-know issue. Citizens in every country on Earth should be let in on this secret."
Paging Fox Mulder.

New 2 videos added to the batch:

Fox News - Happening Now - UFO Sightings Kept Under Wraps

Robert Salas & Robert Hastings interviewed over phone
www.youtube.com...

Morning Live - Air Force Officers' Sworn Testimony About UFO Encounters + Leslie Kean Interview
www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by uforadio
And they keep coming and coming.

New vid.

www.youtube.com...

That bloke annoyed the hell out with me. He was completly clueless. When he said "why would they be interested in our nuculer stuff when their tech would be far superior"

It he for real or what! Did he ever stop to think that maybe they are interested because they are worried we are gonna blow the hell out of eachother?

The media is a complete joke when it comes to ufos!

The military is putting out propaganda. When Bush was in office he had a study done on the nukes. The study came back showing a lot of "Dull Swords". "Dull Sword" is code name for a failure that would prevent launch of a nuke. "Dull Sword" can be anything used for launching nukes. Trucks to haul them, Trailers for hauling them, Computers for testing or firing them, so on and so on. After Bush up graded the internet for the military with special projects such as "Aurora". Maybe you remember "Project Aurora" the black budget program for the Air Force that was worth billions. No it was not a plane or a space craft. It was a Stream Processing Engine and the projects were The Borealis Project, The Aurora Project, The Medusa Project all part of computer chips created for the SIPRnet "Secret Internet Protocol Router Network" the millitaries secret internet ran on the backbone of the regular internet you know NIPRnet "Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network". And this project of creating SIPRnet was a modern day "Manhattan Project" no amount of money was to high. The second project Bush wanted was the update of the nukes. He was prevented from doing this due to non-proliferation and nuclear arms reduction agreements with Russia. If he started playing with nukes the cold war would begin again and Congress, UN and other agencies would not let him start a new arms race. Then came the Russia is evil and starting wars with Georgia. That was Bush's way to end those treaties to start a new nuke program. Mc Cain was supposed to carry out that portion of Bush's plan after he left office but Obama won and the plan was foiled.

Now we have the military wanting there new nuke program. Gates has been on record as recent as 2009 saying he wants a new nuke program but Obama has said NO! the non-poliferation and nuclear arms reduction is more important. He said stay with the program in place of "repair and fix". The military is over looking and allowing "Dull Swords" to create a feeling of the weapons are failing and our security is at stake, but Obama called there bluff and fired the ones in charge of the nukes and replaced them. The military now has turned to propaganda to push this new nuke program forward. They want to create a public out cry and have Congress say check the nukes due to UFOs. Why do they use UFOs as part of there story? It is against the law to speak about anything to do with the nuclear program. Until 2003 it was against the law for the military to even admit a nuclear explosion occured on a military base by accident even if the public was in harms way. A law was changed under Bush allowing for the military to publicly warn people if a US nuclear device had created a threat to the public in 2003 because of fear of terrorist attacks or accidents. Before then they would not tell you. They would just let you die unknown what you were dying from. Scary thought! But the military has found a way around the "neither confirm nor deny" by releasing info with fiction. If your in the "Know" you Know what there talking about. I guess its a way of pushing agendas with public support while having the public wonder "What is really going on". If the people push to get to the truth Congress will act and the "Real truth will never be known to the public" as they put a "National Security" stamp on the subject.

So in conclusion you have military who spends billons on creating microchips and processors and use propaganda of space planes and secret aircrraft to hide it from the public. Paying for all research and development of those microchips and processors in 2004. Then allow those companies to release those to the public 5 years later and take the patents as belonging to those companies so they can make millons off of them for no cost of there own. You have a military who is willing to start a war with Russia just so they can canceal treaties with Russia so they can start a new nuclear program. And now the military is pushing propaganda of UFOs attacking our nuclear arms in order to start a new nuclear program. My question how far will they go and what are they capable of? How out of control are they? And when will people wke up and quit believing the liesnd propagada?

Im not saying theres no aliens or UFOs. I am just telling you what this story is all about. The military wants more and will do what ever the want to get it!!

I took the time to find some of the reports related to the military pushing for new nukes and how the Congress is telling them NO!

Congressional Research Service Report RS21619
Nuclear Weapons and U.S. National Security: A Need for
New Weapons Programs?
Updated September 15, 2003

file....__._/file/crs/RS21619.pdf

In the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, the Bush Administration outlined a new role
forU.S. nuclear weapons that goes beyond the concept of deterrence from the ColdWar.
It also identified a newtargeting strategy thatwould seek to threaten specific capabilities
in adversary nations. Furthermore, the Administration has pledged to restore and
enhance the U.S. nuclear weapons infrastructure, as part of the U.S. effort to deter the
emergence of new threats in the future. In implementing the NPR, the Administration
has requested funding for studies on new types of nuclear weapons. The Administration
claims these projects, if they eventually produce new weapons, would enhance
deterrence; critics claim they will make nuclear use more likely and undermine U.S.
nonproliferation goals. This report will be updated as needed.

The BushAdministration’s Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), completed at the end of
2001, sought to adjust the U.S. nuclear posture to reflect, on the one hand, the emergence
of a more cooperative relationship between the United States and Russia, and, on the
other hand, increasing threats from other states and non-state actors, particularly those
armed with nuclear, chemical and biological weapons (weapons of mass destruction or
WMD). The Administration has highlighted these changes in the international security
environment in several documents, including the U.S. National Security Strategy and the
Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction. The Administration has also
emphasized that the United States will use any means necessary to deter or defeat the use
of WMD by rogue nations or terrorist groups. One of the issues highlighted in the
Nuclear Posture Review is the role that nuclear weapons might play in addressing these
emerging threats.1

Congress told him No!

Congressional Research Service
Report RL33748
Nuclear Warheads: The Reliable Replacement Warhead
Program and the Life Extension Program
December 3, 2007

file....__._/file/crs/RL33748.pdf

Congressional Research Service
Report RL32929
The Reliable Replacement Warhead Program: Background
and Current Developments
September 12, 2008

file....__._/file/crs/RL32929.pdf

Most current U.S. nuclear warheads were built in the 1970s and 1980s and are
being retained longer than was planned. Yet they deteriorate and must be maintained.
To correct problems, a Life Extension Program (LEP), part of a larger Stockpile
Stewardship Program (SSP), replaces components. Modifying some components
would require a nuclear test, but the United States has observed a test moratorium
since 1992. Congress and the Administration prefer to avoid a return to testing, so
LEP rebuilds these components as closely as possible to original specifications. With
this approach, the Secretaries of Defense and Energy have certified stockpile safety
and reliability for the past 12 years without nuclear testing.

If you read through the report you will see where the DOD wants new nukes the request it in ever bill. Bush would support the DOD in wanting new nukes. But Congress has repeatedly said No! Now the DOD does not have Bush to help push for new nukes because Obama is with Congress on saying No! So what does the DOD do the turn to propaganda about UFOs making them useless. Now we just have to wait to see where they go next with this approach?

Just to show you how often Bush and the DOD pushed for new nukes.

12/01/08 — A study by the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture
of the United States, established by the conference version of H.R.
1585, FY2008 defense authorization bill, section 1062, is due.
08/08/08 — NNSA delivered to Congress a report on using existing pits for the
RRW program, required by P.L. 110-181, FY2008 National Defense
Authorization Act, section 3121.
05/22/08 — The House defeated, 145-271, H.Amdt. 1052 to H.R. 5658, the
FY2009 defense authorization bill, to add $10.0 million to NNSA’s
budget for RRW.
05/16/08 — The House Armed Services Committee reported H.R. 5658, the
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for FY2009.
05/05/08 — The Secretaries of Defense and Energy transmitted “Report on the
Feasibility and Implementation of the Reliable Replacement Warhead
Program” to Congress. Congress required the report in the FY2006
National Defense Authorization Act, P.L. 108-163, Section 3111.
12/26/07 — President Bush signed P.L. 110-161, FY2008 Consolidated
Appropriations Act, into law. The measure contains no NNSA funds
to develop RRW.
12/12/07 — The House agreed to the conference report on H.R. 1585, the defense
authorization bill, 370-49.
12/06/07 — The conference report on H.R. 1585, the national defense
authorization bill, was ordered to be printed. It contains several
provisions on RRW, as described above.
11/06/07 — Conferees on the Department of Defense appropriations bill filed
their report, which included $15.0 million for the Navy for RRW.
09/28/07 — NNSA delivered to Congress a JASON report on RRW that was
required by the House Appropriations Committee’s report on FY2007
energy and water appropriations.
09/14/07 — The Senate Appropriations Committee reported H.R. 3222, the
Department of Defense Appropriations Bill.
07/17/07 — The House passed the FY2008 Energy and Water Development
Appropriations Bill, 312-112, leaving RRW provisions unchanged.
07/09/07 — The Senate Appropriations Committee reported S. 1751, the Energy
and Water Development Bill.
http://__._/wiki/CRS-RL32929
CRS-53
06/06/07 — The House Appropriations Committee marked up the FY2008 Energy
and Water Development Appropriations Bill. The committee
recommended eliminating NNSA funds for RRW and directed the
Administration to prepare a comprehensive nuclear planning
assessment, which it views “as a necessary condition before
considering additional funding for Complex 2030 and RRW
activities.”
05/25/07 — The Senate Armed Services Committee’s mark of S. 567, FY2008
National Defense Authorization Bill, reduced the total RRW request
(NNSA and Navy) by $43 million and limited FY2008 activities for
the RRW program to Phase 2A activities.
05/23/07 — The House Energy and Water Development Appropriations
Subcommittee’s mark of the FY2008 Energy and Water Development
Appropriations Bill eliminated NNSA funds for RRW.
05/17/07 — The House passed H.R. 1585, the FY2008 defense authorization bill,
397-27. The bill reduced RRW funding for by $20.0 million and for
the Navy by $25.0 million, kept the program for the first RRW in
Phase 2A for FY2008, and required several studies related to RRW.
04/24/07 — The American Association for the Advancement of Science released
a report, “The United States Nuclear Weapons Program: The Role of
the Reliable Replacement Warhead.”
03/02/07 — NNSA announced that the Nuclear Weapons Council selected the
design by Livermore and Sandia-California as the winner of the RRW
design competition.
03/01/07 — The Secretary of Energy and Secretary of Defense are to submit a
final report to congressional defense committees on feasibility and
implementation of the RRW program, as required by P.L. 109-163,
FY2006 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 3111.
02/18/07 — A committee of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science delivered an interim progress report, “The United States
Nuclear Weapons Program: The Role of the Reliable Replacement
Warhead.”
01/31/07 — NNSA released its “Report on the Plan for Transformation of the
National Nuclear Security Administration Nuclear Weapons
Complex,” as required by P.L. 109-364, the FY2007 National
Defense Authorization Act, Section 3111. An objective of the plan
is “To prepare to produce replacement warheads under the Reliable
Replacement Warhead program....”

Great post and thanks

Inthink we are getting an unofficial disclosure to further the means of the ptb. Nothing gets this kind of exposure without approval. I think that they will use the alien card to deflect the financial meltdown, after all, what's left?

Can anyone answer WHY whenever the MSM is covering the story of UFO's and Intelligent Life, they have to (inevitably) say "Little Green Men"? Anyone else notice this trend?
It's mentioned by this news anchor at the end of the segment:
www.youtube.com...

reply to post by ghr54321


maybe it's their way of telling us not to really pay much attention.
they can't be completely serious, it just wouldn't be their style.

Funny how fox news always have a skeptic handy for all the "UFO" bits...

Heres a picture of the locations of ICBM launch sites around Minot Air Force Base. If you didn't notice the distance from the Air Force Base to the nearest ICBM launch areas it would be about 10 miles from the base its to the nearest one. In the 60's the thought behind these launch sites was to make them blend into the area to hide them. The launch control facility would be under ground with a hidden entrance. The launch facilities where the ICBM missles would be were under ground and hidden. Both would have no watch towers or gaurd stations around them to help hide them. So if a base gaurd did see a UFO around a launch site he would be seeing something atleast 10 miles away if not more. He would then have to travel high way 83 to highway 2 or high way 52 and travel atleast 50 miles to get to where the launch site would be to get vlose to the UFO. To me something smells about stories of seeing UFOs over lauch sites as they were gaurding Minot Air Force Base. They would only see a light in the sky miles away.




You can check it to www.bing.com... or maps.google.com... just search for Minot Air Force Base and look to the left for Highways 2 and 52 for the area where the launch sites are or were?

More iformation on the base here.
www.globalsecurity.org...

Originally posted by Snarf
*sigh*

If Aliens wanted us dead, we'd have been dead long before the bronze age.

Do you people understand that "think outside the box" still has limits of common sense and reality?

I think cattle actually said the same thing.....

Robert Hastings was interviewed on CNN on American Morning.

You can watch it here:
www.youtube.com...
(thanks to "rwa100" for initial lead)

Originally posted by mother1138

UFO-Nukes Press Conference: Sept 27, MSM Anticipating

www.datelinezero.com

From AOL News, to FOX News, to news outlets in Australia and elsewhere; the anticipation and curiosity is palpable. Monday, Sept 27, a handful of former U.S. Military will be meeting with the National Press Club with testimony of more than 120 former or retired military personnel in hand.

The topic will be Unidentified Flying Objects interfering with, and tampering with American nuclear weapons sites.

Note that this is not the same thing as saying that alien beings are tampering ...

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.news.com.au
www.foxnews.com
www.theufochronicles.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Never Before Published Audio Taped Interviews Affirms UFO Activity at Nuke Missile Sites!!

Bummer. But wait.... What if they land and tell us they will not talk to anyone who earns more than $25,000? OK and the reason would be because they would then know that they we conversing with some who was honest. Ha.

tt

CBC - UFO Alert With Robert Salas & Richard Saurett - Sep. 28th 2010
Canadian Broadcasting Corperation
UFO Alert With Robert Salas & Richard Saurett
(Thanks to UFO Updates mailing list for initial lead)
www.youtube.com...

Dear colleagues.

Those are two new audios that I am adding to the archive batch of media coverage about UFO & Nukes National Press Club Conference.

September 30, 2010
Fox News Radio - The Alan Colmes Show
Download link:
www.adrive.com...
(thanks to "rwa100" for initial alert)
Description: During the show, Robert Salas is interviewed, and after that Alan Colmes is taking calls from listeners - show is edited only with UFO references. References on other subjects were removed for your listening pleasure.

September 24, 2010
The Bill Handel Show-KFI AM 640
Download link:
www.adrive.com...
Description: Now this audio clip is really, really bad. Even from the comic perspective it is stereotypically uninventive. I was reluctant to post this, but at the end decided that it should go on the record after all, for future generations and possible future university thesis about media approach on UFOs (this is good sample of bad example). If you are considering this clip from the newsworthy perspective, in that case it would be better to skip this one.

Best Wishes

UFOs & Nukes - Media Coverage

New videos added to the batch with their official descriptions:



September 27-2010
NECN Comcast
Former Air Force officers go public on UFOs

www.youtube.com...



ABC7 - September 28, 2010
Ex-Air Force officials reveal UFO sightings
Several former Air Force officials spoke out about UFO sightings they experience while on U.S. military bases.

www.youtube.com...



ABC - Air Force Vets Talk of UFOs
September 28, 2010
Former officers say alleged UFOs shut down nuclear missiles on military bases.

www.youtube.com...



ABC - NOW@9 - Group says UFOs found nuclear weapons
September 28, 2010

www.youtube.com...



UFO Believers Say ET Could Come Calling on the Metro
Fox 4 - September 29th, 2010
A plant under construction in south Kansas City to produce parts for nuclear weapons could soon be getting some visits from outer space, according to local UFO activists who say that recent revelations by former U.S. Air Force officers about UFO sightings at nuclear weapons facilities give their movement new credibility.

www.youtube.com...



Best Wishes

Recent press conference on UFOs & Nukes gave also additional fire to Leslie Kean's media wave. Those are her recent interviews where UFO & Nukes Conference was also discussed. Here is one sample of latest shows:


Sep30-2010-Mike McConnell Show-WGN Chicago

Download link:

www.adrive.com...




Sep28-2010-The John Williams Show-WGN Radio 720

Download link:

www.adrive.com...




Sep30-2010-WTMY-Talk Sarasota

Download link:

www.adrive.com...




Sep30-2010-Be The Star You Are-World Talk Radio

Download link:

www.adrive.com...





Best Wishes

something I watched from another thread, from a documentary done in 1976 where a doctor explains a ufo sighting over an atomic site years earlier: (starts describing sighting of ufo around 0:50)

Hi Guys Robert Salas has uploaded videos of the 27th Spet 2010 UFO and Nukes Press Conference onto You tube. There are links to the videos at his site.

spiralgalaxy.org...

There is also a new torrent available which contains all the films stitched together.

Here

isohunt.com...

Please seed