"Will Proof of an Adjacent Universe Be the Next Great Discovery?" (Weekend Feature)

"Will Proof of an Adjacent Universe Be the Next Great Discovery?" (Weekend Feature)

www.dailygalaxy.com

"The idea of multiple universes is more than a fantastic invention—it appears naturally within several scientific theories, and deserves to be taken seriously."

Aurelien Barrau, a French particle physicist at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN).

The Hollywood blockbuster, The Golden Compass, adapted from the first volume of Pullman's classic sci-fi trilogy, "His Dark Materials" portrays various universes as only one reality among many, but how realistic is this kind of classic sci-fi plot? While it hasn’t been proven yet, many highly respected and credible scie

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
endlessuniverse.net
www.damtp.cam.ac.uk
www.dailygalaxy.com
physorg.com

I find this article very exciting - I have always thought that we live in a multi-dimensional universe (multiverse?). The initial quote is quite true, people don t seem to realize how serious the idea of parrallel unvierses really is. Science fiction has nearly become science fact and no one notices. As J.G. Ballard said, science fiction won. The only thing is I personally believe there are probably n-dimensional universes - though the idea of a collision of universes is certianly mind blowing, but would universes have to all collide to create realities as ours?

www.dailygalaxy.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

lol at this coinciding with the week of the Season Premiere of Fringe
hahha

Why would they highlight this though?

reply to post by ModernAcademia


I think you hit it on the head, its the seasonal premere of Fringe. Daily Galaxy seems to be trying to highlight its more fantastical side lately, perhaps in an effort to get ATS type subcribers/viewers. It is interesting as a popular social phenomena. I once read that it was more likely that we would discover dimensional travel before discovering faster than light travel. Perhaps its an idea whose time (no pun intended) has come. Perhaps it is no longer one world, one life one god but multi-worlds, multi-lives and multi- gods now - perhaps the next Zeitgeist coming up the line for the 21st century.

reply to post by liquidself


thanks for this post OP!

I have always questioned this. I have read quite a bit about UFO's and that sightings had increased exponentially since the A-Bomb tests.

My point is that a nuclear explosion would not only impact our dimension (which by the way tesla says is at 8 hertz) but I would imagine it would impact others.

Furthermore, the coming press conference on UFO at nuclear weapon sites, it isn't to hard to connect the dots.

Yeah multiverse seems to m ethe best word for it!

Well, i havent seen Fringe since the first season (no tv anymore!), can you tell me shortly what you are talking about?
If this a movement of the next millenia? Dunno, but i see a glimpse of what is possible now and that leads to this conclusion...
I think many of the "alien" intruders are in fact dimensional travellers. But surely this is only my opinion and i have no proof...
Could you give us some insides on why you believe we will master this technic before the faster.than .light travelling?


Peace, love and light,
let u giuide by higher i

Jim

No, I do not think that the discovery of an adjacent universe will be the next great discovery as we've quite a few still more so readily available/attainable by us Earth side.

reply to post by ArcAngel


I think the next great step is the understanding that time as the future impacts some anomaly causing this pure kinetic current of time to convert into all the infinite 3D space for an infinitesimal duration (because time is removed), then infinite 3D space collapses back into the default state of absolute kinetic as the time current of all the past. The present is time converted to space in a thread of infinitesimal duration instances.

Time is kinetic space.
Space is static time.

Time current originates out from the infinite expanse, floods down and inward as a time construct toward the ONE infinitely kinetic, infinitesimal singularity.

The Whole is space (infinite expanse), time (the future), space (the infinitesimal duration present), time (the past), then space (the one infinitely kinetic infinitesimal singularity) All us animate and inanimate finites are encased by infinite inside and out.

Duh!

The universe is made of multiple universes which create the "Infinitentity." ©

Incredibly, just as atoms and our known universe contain 99% empty space so does the Infinitentity.

I propose it goes on like that forever.

Wow... very interesting to see that it went from theory to fact and actually published like that. I, through personal evaluation of philosophy and some 3rd party assistance, I came to this conclusion, seeing it as the ONLY way it could be. For I do believe in souls, next life, previous life, etc. In according with my spiritual beliefs, this would make the utmost sense. Look at it as a more efficient way of learning. You're higher self puts you here and every choice you make, creates an equal opposite separately, physically. I could be replying to this, wearing black pants and smoking a cig, but alternatively, I'm doing EVERYthing the same, except wearing beige shorts and not smoking a cigarette but alternatively, I am and I learn/experience any consequences/rewards for the choice whether it be right in this one or wrong in that one as it's still ME and the experiencing of lessons/catalyst contributes to the totality of the Higher Self and absorbs the lessons from both experiences that way, you need not live out EACH possibility route/method of learning the lesson as what isn't learned here, is learned there and same for vice versa, depending on your specific choices. Imagine a very complex web of which you exist merely at the points of where they connect and otherwise, create the direction. Realistically, you're the Spider itself, knowing each crack and cranny of the web, knowing what's here, what's there, and learning from all aspects as it goes and at once, versus on this small broken up level of consciousness, the timelines split off, and we are merely small aspects that make up the entire web; a Honeycomb, if you will. Each comb having it's unique perception, purpose, and piece of the pie, making it a PART that makes up the WHOLE....

Possibly why there are dreams? Odd sightings of lights/crafts in sky? A crashing/destroying of a timeline? Remembering a previous/alternative experience/memory?

Kinda jumbled and rambled but if you can pick out what I'm saying, the Truth seems valid to me in the theory. Choppy though a typed out explanation might be...

Very interesting none the less... hard to grasp and accept indeed. Don't blame the skeptics at all for disliking this one, it'd be a discovery that'd FORCE you to confront yourself, in the face of such a vast possibility. If one truly is to think about the possibilities and what it'd mean for us (or YOU, lol).

reply to post by JimIrie


I dont really have a very good reason for thinking we may discover multidimensional travel before FTL, it is something I believe came from the Seth books, which struck me as true, its more of an intiuition or hunch. If you look at Brane theory and such, and look at some ideas of how to possibly achieve FTL, they quickly get entangled. I have found this article however - which came from the New Scientist originally apparently.

Hiem-Droscher 8-dimensional hyperspace

Originally posted by tkwasny
reply to post by ArcAngel

 

I think the next great step is the understanding that time as the future impacts some anomaly causing this pure kinetic current of time to convert into all the infinite 3D space for an infinitesimal duration (because time is removed), then infinite 3D space collapses back into the default state of absolute kinetic as the time current of all the past. The present is time converted to space in a thread of infinitesimal duration instances.

Time is kinetic space.
Space is static time.

Time current originates out from the infinite expanse, floods down and inward as a time construct toward the ONE infinitely kinetic, infinitesimal singularity.

The Whole is space (infinite expanse), time (the future), space (the infinitesimal duration present), time (the past), then space (the one infinitely kinetic infinitesimal singularity) All us animate and inanimate finites are encased by infinite inside and out.

edit on 25-9-2010 by tkwasny because: (no reason given)

Yet before any such "understanding" can be achieved one must first preface such extrapolations of rationale by acknowledging the immutable fact that "Time" is but a construct of man, that is, little more than a means of imposing &/or exerting some degree of control &/or influence over an uncontrollable happenstance of existence itself, the empirical fallacy of which is readily evident by the simple observation of the largely varying revolutionary orbits (the primary artifice by which we mark the passing instances of our lives) of the other planets here within our own Solar System.

Ergo, is there such a thing, such an occurrence, as "Time"? Or is it merely a contrivance born out of some lingering aspect of our primordial insecurities when faced with the immenseness of our Universe that seem ever beyond our ability to grasp?

At long last, physicists are beginning to confirm esoteric teachings about other realities. Theosophists and occultists have long believed in the "etheric world". This turns out to be nothing other than the second of the two 10-d space-time sheets predicted by E8xE8' heterotic superstring theory to be separated by a narrow gap extending along the 10th dimension of space predicted by supergravity theories. The first space-time sheet is the familiar physical universe, occupied by superstrings of ordinary matter, whose forces have the symmetry of the first Lie.symmetry group E8; the second sheet is a predicted universe of "shadow matter", which is invisible to any detector that exploits electro-weak or strong forces and which interacts with ordinary matter only gravitationally, being governed by the second, similar Lie group E8'. The two universes pervade each other, occupying exactly the same 9-dimensional space required by superstring theory. However, they are ever separated by the last of the ten dimensions of space required by M-theory.

One universe contains ordinary matter known to nuclear and particle physics; the other contains invisible shadow matter, long called "etheric matter" and sometimes confused with the aether, which is entirely different. The Taoist's chi (or qi), or the yogi's prana. is the shadow matter counterpart of electromagnetic forces.