Hyper-Drive, Warp Drive, We don't know how gravity works?

reply to post by XPLodER


I think you have put together an excellent summation of what is basically Einsteins theory, with perhaps a few twists of your own. I like the way you described gravity as working, and the attention to scale, which I think is one of the biggest factors science and mathematics ignore.

In my theory our sun creates a very large magnetic field in which our solar system exists, which we perceive as gravity. Each planet also creates it's own magnetic field, but that field is linked to our sun, which is linked to the center of our galaxy. However, these forces as we know them are not one directional, but work like the lines of flux created by magnetic fields.

The rolling along on a sheet explanation you offered, I thought to be especially insightful. How about Rolling along, or spinning like a spool being unthreaded, except while some of the line is taken away, others are being added or pulled in.

reply to post by poet1b


I think i explained it perfectly when i say, "Gravity is observation and focus".

Where you take it from there is up to you. Example:

The observer is god through my eyes, or experience. I could say that i am creating reality through my own experience with the observation of god over me. Me being god on another scale of experience.

That is just an example.

We have not mastered gravity. We barely know what it is. And "we", as in the people who secretly fund shadow projects, haven't mastered it either although they are much further along than "we".

reply to post by prepared4truth


The reason it can't be mastered is because gravity is the observer.

I am,

What is telling everything to do its job so that i can experience it doing its job.

When you hold a picture together in your mind, is it you or the gravity of the picture holding it together?

here is a visual representation of the mass pricipale over orbital conditions (string from roof)


link to exterior utube vidoe canot imbed

link to bin.com ex skunkworks director vid

interesting about the extra forces to the ones we are using

xp

Originally posted by onequestion
reply to post by TeslaandLyne

 

Could your perception of what you choose to observe affect how it "looks"? Is there a difference between choosing what you observe, and your perception of what you observe?

Well in an experiment you only have to prove it to yourself.
If anyone works on what you have discovered and observed then you were
right as all the people seem to follow your observations correctly.

No matter what other may perceive, some understand correctly.

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Perhaps like the first time Tesla had a coil shoot off like a bullet we will see one
guy on youtube show us how he was so surprised.

John Searle had such a thing happen in his original garage. His original intent was to make a generator. Story goes when powered up it glowed and shot straight through the roof of his garage and kept going. Much of that early work was confiscated by 'them'

Originally posted by onequestion
We can't figure out what gravity is because we are creating the reality we choose to observe. It's all really that simple.

Seems you might be correct..

Albert Einstein
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."

Albert Einstein
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."

Matthew 17:20 Jesus says quite clearly:

"For truly, I say to you, if you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you. "

Yoda:
“Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you? Hmm? Hmm. And well you should not. For my ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. Life creates it, makes it grow. Its energy surrounds us and binds us. Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter. You must feel the Force around you; here, between you, me, the tree, the rock, everywhere, yes. Even between the land and the ship.”

Luke:
“I can’t believe it.”

Yoda:
“That is why you fail.”

But I doubt you will convince the masses at ATS

reply to post by zorgon


I think that if other dimensions exist, it wouldn't be a function of power, but of frequency.

We transmit electrical power capable of doing a great deal of work by capturing it at a frequency, which is critical to the transmission of the power. We also communicate by sending massive amounts of information through the airwaves and down wires into cyberspace but manipulating the frequency though which the information is carried.

I think the concept of space being warped, in a way we can't see, as you presented, as an interesting theory. I kind of wonder if maybe the universe is layered, kind of like an onion, except not contained in a ball, but forever spiraling outward, in what we experience as time. Stepping into another dimension or time travel could be a matter of shifting into the right frequency.

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
As far as the unknown and unverified ether theory goes that
might also effect the electrical universe there is a indication
that not force ( F = ma) but momentum ( M = mv ) is the
controlling factor.

Try this one on for size...

The book presents new concepts in the study of gravitation. A new equation for the gravitational force is introduced, which is the correct interpretation of Kepler's third law and which has been verified experimentally to very high precision. The equation is F = a.A, or force = acceleration Area. The book also presents equations for the sequential distances of the planets from the sun and of satellites from the centers of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus, with correlation coefficients upwards of 0.99, concluding that gravitation is quantized. A simple and useful equation for eccentricity is presented as the ratio of the sum of perturbations to the gravitational force of the sun. It is shown that Kepler's second law is not a general law; i.e., equal areas are swept in approximately equal intervals of time only near aphelion and perihelion. There is now confusion between the concepts of "force" and "energy." In the last chapter of the book, new units are introduced to clarify the two concepts. Any equation containing "mass" relates to the concept of "energy". Force is independent of mass.

Pari Spolter: Gravitational Force of the Sun

Originally posted by poet1b
Stepping into another dimension or time travel could be a matter of shifting into the right frequency.

That would certainly tie into the other work we looked at with resonance. And it certainly connects with the Schumann resonance and time anomalies. Google THAT and see what a can of worms you open

I have had that on my back burner for a few years, never find the time to track it all down and record it... but if you want weird, every time I start looking into that, things 'change'. Stuff I read and found on the net is suddenly gone, even files I had on my computer... no trace... Now of course that leads us to jumping time lines but that is a whole new thread

But google "Schumann resonance and time anomalies" I know you will find it fascinating

OH! And I expect a report in triplicate by next week

heys was skimming over the posts and after reading i'll give you the answer, its really very small, and everyone knows it already

E = Mc2

There ya go. The key to gravity. According to that, all we have to do is create enough energy to equal the mass of a star and poof we'll get dragged around attracted to other matter

So, to say make a energy orb with the attraction of the earth.. mmm.. anyone out there bright with math? like how much E would the mass of the Earth equal? Bet phage already knows haha

I also believe gravity if seen would be in waves, like ripples on a pond generating outward

and to see those ripples, you would have to be in say the 5th dimentional, a dimension of .. well gravity .. where you would see the ripples of planets moving but no planets.. thus the gravity dimension affects ours

yep.. kindof a few burst ideas there. been working on some for a while now but just thought i'd fire those out there. I suppose with my idea, gravity would exist in your hyperspace/subspace depending on if your a wookie or a trekkie

I dont see lightspeed as a prospec for space travel though, warp drive is fast, even by startrek standards but in a universe thats expanding outward with distances growing farther and farther with every word i type.. lightspeed suddenly comes to a standstill

Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by zorgon

 

We transmit electrical power capable of doing a great deal of work by capturing it at a frequency, which is critical to the transmission of the power

No it isn't.

Electrical power is quite practical and usable 0 frequency, i.e. DC. In the 19th century there were competing DC (Edison) and AC (Westinghouse/Tesla) systems. AC won---then---because of major economic and practical benefits.

Essential physical fact: For a given power, you lose less to resistive heating the higher voltage that you can transmit it.

Essential technological fact: In the 19th and most of 20th century it was difficult and expensive to convert DC to high voltages for transmission and down to lower voltages for practical household/factory use. However, the physics of AC (magnetic induction) meant that transformers could up and downconvert from low to high voltage with fairly small loss. This was difficult or impossible with DC.

Therefore AC system was more economically and technically practical.

Today, there are semiconductor power devices which can convert to AC and high voltage DC which didn't exist before, and certain modern transmission lines are DC---at highest voltages DC is even better than AC as there aren't inductive losses, and you can use two wires instead of 3 for 3-phase Westinghouse/Tesla AC.

But the rest of the and infrastructure is designed for AC so it will stay that way.

reply to post by mbkennel


What isn't?

Speaking on absolutes are we?

We don't transmit power using a frequency?

By your own post, clearly you recognize that we do.

Maybe DC could be a superior way to transmit electricity, but I don't think 0 hz actually exists. There are always frequency variations on any circuit, and getting good clean DC takes a lot of sophisticated electronics. How are they producing these high voltage DC voltages? Some sort of massive battery source? Or is AC produced and then converted back into DC? The reason high voltage is more effective is because the current cause the heating and energy loss. The higher the voltage, the lower the current. The problem is that the higher the voltage, the harder it is to contain. The greater the Voltage, the greater the Potential for disaster.

Interesting point, got any links or effective search words on this technology?

reply to post by zorgon


Very interesting.

The Sun, positive charged, the Earth, negative charged. I wonder what charge the black hole at he center of our galaxy carries.

Here is a nice link on Schulmann resonance.

www.earthbreathing.co.uk...

At the time when Schumann published his research results in the journal `Technische Physik', Dr Ankermueller, a physician, immediately made the connection between the Schumann resonance and the alpha rhythm of brainwaves. He found the thought of the earth having the same natural resonance as the brain very exciting and contacted Professor Schumann, who in turn asked a doctorate candidate to look into this phenomenon. This candidate was Herbert König who became Schumann's successor at Munich University. König demonstrated a correlation between Schumann Resonances and brain rhythms. He compared human EEG recordings with natural electromagnetic fields of the environment (1979) and found that the main frequency produced by Schumann oscillations is very close to the frequency of alpha rhythms.

I think 8 hz is the frequency of the typical rock and roll tune.

The implications are astounding.

If we were somehow capable of changing our natural frequency, what would we encounter?

If we could tune ourselves into the resonance of the God particles Gnostics speak of, maybe we could instantly communicate across the galaxy, or even transport ourselves instantly to where we choose to go.

reply to post by onequestion


I don't believe in perfection. Imperfection leads to improvisation and imagination.

One can always do better. Sometimes it is better to use less focus, and more exploration of the periphery.

Consider how we can hide from gravities observation.

Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by mbkennel

 

What isn't?

Speaking on absolutes are we?

We don't transmit power using a frequency?

By your own post, clearly you recognize that we do.

Maybe DC could be a superior way to transmit electricity, but I don't think 0 hz actually exists.

The non-zero frequency components can be filtered to a sufficiently low level for the devices to work.

There are always frequency variations on any circuit, and getting good clean DC takes a lot of sophisticated electronics. How are they producing these high voltage DC voltages? Some sort of massive battery source? Or is AC produced and then converted back into DC? The reason high voltage is more effective is because the current cause the heating and energy loss. The higher the voltage, the lower the current. The problem is that the higher the voltage, the harder it is to contain. The greater the Voltage, the greater the Potential for disaster.

Interesting point, got any links or effective search words on this technology?

en.wikipedia.org...