It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
But on Thursday, the chair of the House science committee, Democrat U.S. Rep. Bart Gordon of Tennessee, introduced legislation that closely mirrors a compromise plan supported by the White House and passed by a key Senate committee in July. The Senate bill directs NASA to build a new spacecraft that one day could reach an asteroid while investing about $1.6 billion over three years in commercial rocket companies.
"This is a good, bipartisan, and fiscally responsible bill."
Originally posted by StarrGazer25
How is investing 1.6 billion in the next three years in commercial rocket companies a good and fiscally responible?? Im sorry they might say we our out of a recession but if im not mistaken our deficit is still in the trillions right?! But I do understand we can not stop our space exploration, believe me I almost cried when I heard they were shutting down the NASA program until 2021..or 2025.. but is it really a good idea to commercialize it? Who has the money to take a joy ride into space?! And where would you go? We dont have a moon base or anything... what would we be orbiting in space for a week as a vacation?
www.orlandosentinel.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Granite
Reading the article makes you lose hope of a logical long-term space plan. Perhaps by intention...but why?
Why Utah for preference in site?
Originally posted by Granite
It will take the ocean a few thousand years to recover from the rape of the past 200 years...hello back!