It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
so it's a bit unfair to imply he's somehow introducing a false dichotomy when all he's doing is responding to the charge.
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Why, why, WHY would an alien go to the trouble of returning an "abductee" to earth?
When Calvin Klein tests perfume on mices' eyes, I doubt he takes them back to the field afterward. Think about it.
edit on 22-9-2010 by FOXMULDER147 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Turiddu
Until I see real evidence of these claims I will still to my original assertion.
Edit-
I'd add to my list hallucinations caused by various things.
We are here debating semantics and primate evolution but the bottom line is that we have not a single piece of evidence to back any of the claims. Where are the photos? Where are the videos from security cameras? Where are the scientifically analyzed "implants"? Where are the stolen alien tools or logbooks? Where are the exotic materials being presented by abductees? The only thing we have to go on with these tales are testimonies and drawings, both of which are many times influenced by "investigators" who already know what they are looking for...
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
Yes, you are quite likely right. What do you think though? Do you agree with Turridu that all 'alien' abductions can be explained by those three things?
Originally posted by wasco2
New research suggests repressed memories don't exist. Since most "abductees" discover their ordeals under hypnosis this represents a major blow to those who claim alien abductions are real and widespread. I've met dozens of claimed "abductees" and always suspected most of them are mentally ill, this just strengthens that belief.
www.abc.net.au...