Sealand skull photos released

I'm not so sure the search function is my friend. Certainly this skull has been discussed before. Alas, the search returned no results, so here it is...

An alien survivor from a prehistoric saucer crash? An unfortunate time traveler from the future? A tradesman from a parallel universe? A hitherto undiscovered species? Or a mere freak deformity of a human being? Nobody knows for sure, but no matter the explanation, the Sealand Skull has potential to change the view of the world we live in.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4be68a49f0ce.jpg[/atsimg]
Image credit: Anton Spangenberg

SOURCE: www.unexplained-mysteries.com...

I have no idea what this is and make no speculation on it at this time. I will reserve judgment until I see some actual scientific data. However, I figured I would share with you all and open the floor for debate, speculation and the likes.

Enjoy!

Is that pic you posted a cast of the skull or the actual skull itself? Because if its the actual skull itself I am dubious, due to the seams and stuff that are visible. However if its just a cast (I suspect it is, you never display the original itself) then thats fine and the seams make sense.

reply to post by Aggie Man



Looks exactly like the skull from the latest Indiana Jones movie:

www.iwatchstuff.com...

maybe this is going to be a part of the fake alien disclosure soon to hit MSM...?

S&F. Thanks for the OP.

I never saw this one before, interesting that it is 1 1/2 X the size of the normal homo sapiens cranium.

Originally posted by Yazman
Is that pic you posted a cast of the skull or the actual skull itself? Because if its the actual skull itself I am dubious, due to the seams and stuff that are visible. However if its just a cast (I suspect it is, you never display the original itself) then thats fine and the seams make sense.

The article makes no mention of it being a cast, and I agree with your assessment. I have added larger image of the skull to the OP. The only thing that strikes me is why "dirty up" the skull if it's a cast, unless the purpose of the image is to mislead.

The skull looks really fake. Someone most of cleaned and prepared this skull carefully if it is real.

sorry to say it is a hoax.




the biggest give away is the teeth. they meet the skull in a straight line, and most of them are joined together, not seperate.
compare to this guy:

pics from :

www.unexplained-mysteries.com...

I'm 50/50 on this being fake it does look rather well preserved and I can't see a single missing tooth which seems a bit odd to me
However even if it's not fake there are people alive right this minute that have very strange skull shapes through physical deformity caused by genetic disorders like progeria.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1cff2c67ba68.jpg[/atsimg]

Originally posted by davespanners
I'm 50/50 on this being fake it does look rather well preserved and I can't see a single missing tooth which seems a bit odd to me
However even if it's not fake there are people alive right this minute that have very strange skull shapes through physical deformity caused by genetic disorders like progeria.

I suspect that it is a fake. However, for the sake of argument, let's say it's not fake. If it's not fake, then we need to find a genetic disorder that causes enormous eye sockets. I am not aware of one, although that does not mean that such a disorder does not exist.

too perfect looking.

hate that we don't have the 1 page reference anymore.

i don't buy it, sorry.

I don't know either way at all, never heard of the skull nor done a shred of research on human cranial anatomy in order to give a comparison...

...but it seems a bit premature to debunk it by pointing out features that aren't "normal", cause if this were to be the real deal, how can we define what normal extraterrestrial skull anatomy is? Aside from some black ops scientists in the know, no one has the data required to fully debunk this or starchild.

reply to post by Aggie Man


I'm not aware of a recognized disorder like that either, but I don't think that genetic abnormalities have to be recognized as a specific syndrome, as far as I know you can get completely one off random mutations. like thisbaby born with three arms, it's just a random bit of bad luck

I'm more 90/10 on it being fake now since I saw the other images.

The closest recognized genetic problem I could find is Hyperteloryzm
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9da952f0407e.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by davespanners

the biggest give away is the teeth. they meet the skull in a straight line, and most of them are joined together, not seperate

Might this joining explain the no missing teeth? It seems to me the teeth are all connected than the loss of one would be less likely.

If it's real. it has more eye than brain. Also the teeth have prominent canines, best described as "fangs," yet the teeth seem more consistent with those of an omnivore. It is also remarkably well preserved, in which case one wonders what happened to the rest of the skeleton. In short, it looks exactly like what people brought up on Whitney Streiber, the "X-Files" and the "Alien Autopsy Film" expect an alien skull to look like. If it looks too good to be true....

I thought that the Greys didn't have teeth as such, and that the theory is that they have vestigial mouths not used for eating, but that they absorbed their food through some sort of nutrient bath.

Now if this skull is the genuine article, then maybe we all need to worry. Those teeth look more like something out of a vampire story. Could this be the skull of a Chupacabras? The large eyes suited for night vision, the large teeth suited for attacking animals, the size of the brain cavity looks small in relation to the rest of the skull, so perhaps not a higher functioning being?

Maybe they could take a cast (of a cast?) and give it to the facial reconstruction people and see what they can come up with for it! I bet it looks scary as hell when done.

reply to post by davespanners



looks like my pug.

interesting.

reply to post by Aggie Man


Sorry, this is a fake. The teeth gave it away. They were clearly detailed in from one piece and any creatures mandible is going to have a socket from which it can lock on the skull...

Hmmmm...
Interesting quote from the article..

The Sealand Skull is about one and a half times larger than a male Homo sapiens cranium. Especially the eye sockets contribute to its size. Its smooth surface reveals that the creature was adapted to cold climate, and its relative eye size that it was either a night creature, lived underground or on a planet orbiting a remote or dim star, probably an orange or red dwarf. It is noted that the star 51 Pegasi in the Pegasus constellation was the first Sun-like star known to have a planet. Planets orbiting the Pegasus star HR 8799 were the first to be directly imaged, and spectroscopic analysis of HD 209458 b, another planet in the constellation, has provided the first evidence of atmospheric water vapor beyond our solar system.

When I first saw that picture I swore it WAS infact ET.

But upon thinking, All ET sightings, abductions say that they have a Slit for a mouth and a small hole for a nose.
This skull clearly has some teeth including Molars.