It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wang Sichao, a planetary astronomer from the Purple Hills Observatory under the Chinese Academy of Science (CAS), confirmed after one week of analysis that the UFO sightings were "ghost images" as a result of the reflection on camera lenses from the intense light emitted by outdoor circular lamps. The outdoor circular lamps are symmetrical to the video image center.
Originally posted by Radiobuzz
According to the article you've posted:
Wang Sichao, a planetary astronomer from the Purple Hills Observatory under the Chinese Academy of Science (CAS), confirmed after one week of analysis that the UFO sightings were "ghost images" as a result of the reflection on camera lenses from the intense light emitted by outdoor circular lamps. The outdoor circular lamps are symmetrical to the video image center.
So it appears to have been proved wrong on that very same page.
Originally posted by Radiobuzz
reply to post by MilzGatez
Well, if the study has reached empirical conclutions then I will believe the study, although it doesn't appear to be on the site. In fact the site doesn't appear to have much info either way around.
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
english.peopledaily.com.cn...
There is a new wave of sightings over Hong Kong in which new photographs have been taken. I have the feeling that the image is some sort of reflection of the lamps. ATS members this is a case for you to work on and see if it has any depth. If you go to the link above the article is available, and you can even listen to the article.
Originally posted by jephers0n
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
english.peopledaily.com.cn...
There is a new wave of sightings over Hong Kong in which new photographs have been taken. I have the feeling that the image is some sort of reflection of the lamps. ATS members this is a case for you to work on and see if it has any depth. If you go to the link above the article is available, and you can even listen to the article.
You do actually realize that your link debunks your own thread, right?
It plainly says in the article that they are actually calling these 'ufos' Ghost Images, or reflections in the window from the lamps.
There's no classier way to start a day, than debunking your own thread.
I'll throw you a s+f for that, at least hah!