only listened to a few selected parts but thanks for posting!!
Nice to hear it directly from one of the publishers. A lot of people (debunkers) don't understand what an "open journal" is; I'm really thankful this
sceintific research is available to the public!
Why the Harrit Nano-thermite paper has not yet been debunked
edit on 14-9-2010 by Thermo Klein because: Added link
Here's a debunking for you: Thermite has a maximum energy content of 4.0MJ/kg. One of the samples tested had energy content nearly twice that.
What do you think that means?
(In before nano/super/thermate and variants there-of).
ETA: I wonder, does Harrit mention the "many-many tonnes" of conventional explosives, which he told Russia Today must have been used in order to bring
down the towers?
edit on 14-9-2010 by roboe because: (no reason given)